Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Worries grow with expansion of Al-Sadr's army
AP ^ | December 7 2006

Posted on 12/07/2006 6:37:54 PM PST by jmc1969

The Iraq Study Group says the private army of anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr could be 60-thousand fighters strong.

Al-Sadr's Mahdi army is one of the concerns highlighted in the Iraq Study Group's report, released yesterday. It's one of many factions undermining U-S efforts to help Iraq's democracy gain control.

The study group says many of al-Sadr's followers are planted throughout the security forces that protect Iraqi government institutions.

And more worrisome than their numbers, which stood at ten-thousand in 2005, is al-Sadr's organizational ability. One terrorism expert says cell phones, Internet communications and other technology gives the Mahdi army an "enormous" ability to mobilize their forces.

And the panel worries that al-Sadr himself may not be able to manage his growing network.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alsadr; iraq; iraqstudygroup; isg; muqtada; opiraqifreedom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

We had a chance in August 2004 as well.


21 posted on 12/07/2006 6:59:09 PM PST by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JustDoItAlways

The Badr militia has been targeting insurgent leaders since 2004.

The Madhi Army doesn't target insurgents. The Madhi Army is a bunch of cowards that find dozens of Sunni women and children and butcher them to show their manhood.

The Madhi Army are cowardly monsters like al-Qaeda.


22 posted on 12/07/2006 7:03:25 PM PST by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Parrot_was_devastating

Allegra bump


23 posted on 12/07/2006 7:05:34 PM PST by CPT Clay (Drill ANWR, Personal Accounts NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dr_who_2
Correction--What did the Saudis do when Hussein invaded Kuwait?
24 posted on 12/07/2006 7:07:07 PM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I'm sure you're right. Unfortunately, I asked the wrong question.


25 posted on 12/07/2006 7:08:03 PM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JustDoItAlways

Yup: The maggots should be just about done on Al Sadr now, instead of him having 60,000 men .

One of the problems is that all the while we were training an Iraqui police force we have been training Al Sadr's men.

Until the shooting actually starts they cant tell who the guy standing next to them wil be shooting.

I say protect the Kurds and let these people fight to the death of both sides. I cant see where either side is worth protecting.


26 posted on 12/07/2006 7:11:27 PM PST by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Kill al-Sadr. Wait 3 days for the funeral. Let 100,000 of those @ssholes show up for the protest funeral and kill each and everyone of them with no mercy to any one of them! Show their steam corpses on TV and tell the Ny Times they are next!


27 posted on 12/07/2006 7:21:33 PM PST by Bommer (If people evolved from apes, why are there still apes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

You are correct. We should have taken the guy out from the beginning. Although they threatened a riot - bit deal. Better to deal with it all at once and be rid of this vermin.


28 posted on 12/07/2006 7:25:23 PM PST by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bommer

Well that would be nice but as we learned from the photos shot in Afghanistan, we don't kill terrorists when they are burying one of their own at a funeral. Got to show 'em some respect.


29 posted on 12/07/2006 7:25:43 PM PST by mrmargaritaville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mrmargaritaville

30 posted on 12/07/2006 7:40:04 PM PST by Gritty (The sad reality is that never before has an enemy hidden in such plain sight - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
All I have is 'my gut' on this one and my gut says that the tide may be turning on Sadr. Time will tell. A year from now I will have egg on my face or not.

For if and when the Iraqi's get serious about their national sovereignty/security, it will be the Iraqis themselves that undo him.

With the US now publicly on track to reduce forces, Sadr and his army should loose the tacit support of a civilian population that naturally would resist an occupying force.

Of course that raises another question of will forces actually be reduced on the proposed time table? Already we are seeing hesitation and balking from several spokesmen who up till now were all for it.

Agree?
31 posted on 12/07/2006 7:42:42 PM PST by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parrot_was_devastating

BTTT


32 posted on 12/07/2006 7:49:20 PM PST by Chgogal (If not Iraq, why then Darfur?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

you have two bullies there both courting their common girlfriend that they want to share

poke each one in the eye... the epicenters of Tehran and Damascus.... and then hit them in the jaw.

do that and the ho's problems go away


33 posted on 12/07/2006 7:58:48 PM PST by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf

The Madhi Army didn't grow five fold this past year on the back of Shia hated of America. No, the Madhi Army and al-Qaeda are both being fed today by mutual violence against each other community. If al-Qaeda kills your family in a suicide bomb attack and you are a Shia, more often then not you want revenge and all to many of these young men are taking up arms with the group that causes the most violence to Sunni civilians. And, we know which group that is.

When the Madhi Army kills a Sunni families we are seeing the same gravitiation of Sunni men towards al-Qaeda in Iraq which is the number one group today for young Sunni men to join to get revenge against Shia.

Zarqawi started a really annoying cycle of violence. There may just be one way to break the cycle of violence and that is with the Iraqi Army. The US doesn't have the political will to do what needs to be done and the Iraqi government is too weak and divided to do much of anything right now.

A smart secular young Iraqi Army officer is going to have to step up and end this crap and the US is going to have to let him do it.


34 posted on 12/07/2006 8:01:49 PM PST by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dr_who_2
Correction--What did the Saudis do when Hussein invaded Kuwait?

Grinned...allong with U.S. Oil Giants who favored B.P. oil gets its butt kicked in Kuwait.
Anyhoo....the side of world oil play that seldom is tabled openly,
Even though B.P. is technically an ally via Britian,,,,their holdings and potential [lost] oil signatory's in the mid east see them gamed on with no mercy as they say.
B.P. was front sponsor of Badami on North Slope of Alaska [Which I worked on for 2 years plus]...and flopped totally [Insufficient pressure in cache layers....injection format failure....lines froze,....project failure....Geologists got this one wrong....Badami cost 300 Million -turning out only 4 Million BBL's]
B.P. also got clobbered by Russia....Putin suckered B.P. into voluminous front money for field signatory which flopped aswell...with B.P. getting nothing but glares from their finance division.
Part of B.P. morphed into U.S. Amoco [Amoco B.P.]
B.P. has some of its Iraqi oil signatory back....but that is in Shia south....so how secure is that : )

35 posted on 12/07/2006 8:03:48 PM PST by Parrot_was_devastating
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: KingArthur305

"The Mahdi Army, led by Moqtada al-Sadr, may number
as many as 60,000 fighters. It has directly challenged U.S. and
Iraqi government forces, and it is widely believed to engage in
regular violence against Sunni Arab civilians. Mahdi fighters
patrol certain Shia enclaves, notably northeast Baghdad’s teeming
neighborhood of 2.5 million known as “Sadr City.” As the
Mahdi Army has grown in size and influence, some elements
have moved beyond Sadr’s control.
The Badr Brigade is affiliated with the Supreme Council
for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI), which is led by
Abdul Aziz al-Hakim. The Badr Brigade has long-standing ties
with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps. Many Badr members
have become integrated into the Iraqi police, and others
play policing roles in southern Iraqi cities. While wearing the
uniform of the security services, Badr fighters have targeted
Sunni Arab civilians. Badr fighters have also clashed with the
Mahdi Army, particularly in southern Iraq."

From page 5 of the report


36 posted on 12/07/2006 8:13:26 PM PST by ARealMothersSonForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
Parrot posts above...


So then.....with Russia sitting in the wings and hoping for Iranian Victory in Iraq,
Will She who sends the black spot ,allong with Emperor Husband and Democrat flying monkeys,
Become Vienna Summer and jilt CFR Dem globalists like Zbiegniew Brzenzski by letting Russia near the prize of mid east oil?

37 posted on 12/07/2006 8:17:22 PM PST by Parrot_was_devastating
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Parrot_was_devastating

Back in 91 when we had the manpower to do the job I said we ought to seize the ME Oil Fields

Arabs can't protect them and that was the 2nd time we had to go over to protect the flow of oil


38 posted on 12/07/2006 8:22:04 PM PST by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
"RECOMMENDATION 34: The question of the future U.S. force presence must be on the table for discussion as the national reconciliation dialogue takes place. Its inclusion will increase the likelihood of participation by insurgents and militia leaders, and thereby increase the possibilities for success."

It seems that the concept is to require Maliki to have militias outlawed-

"NATIONAL RECONCILIATION
By the end of 2006–early 2007: ➤Approval of the Provincial Election Law and setting an election date ➤Approval of the Petroleum Law ➤Approval of the De-Baathification Law ➤Approval of the Militia Law
By March 2007:
➤A referendum on constitutional amendments (if it is necessary)
By May 2007:
➤Completion of Militia Law implementation ➤Approval of amnesty agreement ➤Completion of reconciliation efforts

39 posted on 12/07/2006 8:22:54 PM PST by ARealMothersSonForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

It may well be that the end game is the installation of a new authoritarian figure, who rules by fear. Saddam redux, hopefully less dangerous. The alternative is partition, de facto or de jure. I really don't see an elected government surviving to run an Iraq as presently constituted. On that one, I don't agree with Bush's optimism.


40 posted on 12/07/2006 8:24:37 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson