Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: processing please hold
It's easy to say when you have nothing to risk by typing the words on your little comfy keyboard, but this is NOT WWII.

The question is, are you willing to sacrifice 400,000 men to defeat this enemy, or is your nostalgia for WWII selective?

281 posted on 12/07/2006 10:52:34 AM PST by ohioWfan (President Bush - courageously and honorably protecting us in dangerous times, . Praise the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]


To: ohioWfan

all respects but you bet this ain't wwII
,It is bigger.


289 posted on 12/07/2006 10:58:42 AM PST by advertising guy (If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]

To: ohioWfan
It's not WWII you're right-it's worst-with higher stakes.

Something you seem not to be able to fathom.

The question is, are you willing to sacrifice 400,000 men to defeat this enemy, or is your nostalgia for WWII selective?

Jeez, what a stupid statement.(go ahead, hit the abuse button)That was a world war, this is a regional war. But, since you asked, if it takes ten times that many to defeat the islamofacist, it would be lives well spent. Do you not see that this is a war between good and evil? The only option we have is to win it. Not too, will lead to subjugation and dhimmitude.

301 posted on 12/07/2006 11:09:27 AM PST by processing please hold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson