Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Activist Claims 'Deception' Behind Gov. Romney's 'Conversion' to Conservatism
Agape Press ^ | 12/6/6 | Jim Brown

Posted on 12/07/2006 7:51:55 AM PST by ZGuy

A pro-family activist group in Massachusetts is warning that Governor Mitt Romney is not the conservative politician he's portraying himself to be. The group has unveiled a lengthy document titled "The Mitt Romney Deception."

Mass Resistance founder Brian Camenker says the Republican presidential candidate has been "posturing" himself in other states as a conservative, pro-life, anti-homosexual "marriage" candidate -- but his record, says the activist, tells a much different story. Camenker has followed Romney since his first political campaign against Ted Kennedy in 1994.

"I watched him on television talk about how he was for abortion and how he would be more for homosexual rights than Ted Kennedy himself," he shares. "I mean, we watched him say this on television. And when he ran for governor, we all watched as he claimed to be just as pro-choice as his Democrat opponent."

In "The Mitt Romney Deception," Camenker states that Romney's "new found conversion" to conservatism "very likely coincides with his candidacy for the presidency." The document, says the activist, is necessary because of a "calculated effort" by the Romney campaign to "revise his history and portray [him] as far more conservative than the record shows." And that record, writes Camenker, "indicates that [Romney] has spend his entire career speaking and governing as a liberal."

Camenker says he does not see how a conservative group or publication could take Romney seriously.

"It really shocked me how gullible a lot of these conservatives around the country have been," he says, "and part of it has been because of Romney's very impressive PR campaign into which I guess he's pumped quite a lot of money -- probably millions of dollars -- and the fact that a lot of people just didn't see what we saw here in Massachusetts."

According to the Mass Resistance spokesman, homosexual newspapers have praised Romney quite a bit over the years. In addition he notes that the Log Cabin Republicans, a pro-homosexual group within the GOP, endorsed the governor in both elections while he ran as a liberal.

Romney's office did not return calls requesting an interview with the governor.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 12/07/2006 7:51:58 AM PST by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

This is a bs attack, by a bunch of unknowns.

Romney is by far the most conservative running for 08


2 posted on 12/07/2006 7:54:28 AM PST by johnqueuepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

The Agape Press is probably owned by SOROS !


3 posted on 12/07/2006 7:55:12 AM PST by Zenith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnqueuepublic

Brain Camenker is not an unknown. You may not know this but Catholic Charities had to stop its adoption program because the Romney Administration would not grant it a waiver that would allow them not to have to place children with Same-Sex couples. Not real good for women who want their children to have a family that looks like Jesus, Mary and Joseph. Not real good for the kids either.


4 posted on 12/07/2006 8:05:52 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Camenker


5 posted on 12/07/2006 8:05:56 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

Agape Press has a reputation in the pro-life movement. It appears to be a subsidiary of the American Family Association.

Occasionally, Donald Wildmon can be too much of a purist for his own good, but he's reliably conservative.

I have heard these same arguments from other sources. Regretably, there is considerable reason to think that Romney supports abortion from personal conviction as well as opportunism as a campaigner in Massachusetts.


6 posted on 12/07/2006 8:07:22 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zenith

Somehow I don't see the word Agape associated with Soros at all!


7 posted on 12/07/2006 8:07:55 AM PST by longhorn too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zenith
The Agape Press is probably owned by SOROS !

Nope--they're "Christian conservatives"--the same folks who sat out he 2006 election out of sheer spite, giving the Democrats control of the House and Senate. It's only been a month since the election and they've already set up the circular firing squad.

They only care about their power in the GOP.

They've abandoned Reagan's 11th Commandment.

The GOP needs a way to win without these fair weather "friends".

8 posted on 12/07/2006 8:11:54 AM PST by Tinian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

Donner Party, call your office!!!!


9 posted on 12/07/2006 8:14:35 AM PST by zook (America going insane - "Do you read Sutter Caine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

Not good enough, off with his head!


10 posted on 12/07/2006 8:33:26 AM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tinian

I am a Christian Conservative and I voted straight Republican in the 2006 election.

James Dobson and James Kennedy are Christian Conservatives, too, not even as conservative as I am, and they called this election too important to sit-out.

All the Christian Conservatives I know, and all the Christian Conservative leaders I heard from by radio, by email, and by US post, were telling us to go out and vote.

I don't know ANY Christian Conservatives who sat-out the election. Not ANY.

And just to clarify, we do not consider voting for less-than-perfect candidates as the "lesser of two evils", but rather as voting for the "greater good".

Please don't blame us.

WE VOTED!!!

.

11 posted on 12/07/2006 8:36:40 AM PST by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Zenith
No, as has been stated here. Romney is also very pro gun control, ie: anti second amendment. And pro socialized medicine. Among other liberal stances.
12 posted on 12/07/2006 8:45:16 AM PST by gidget7 (Political Correctness is Marxism with a nose job)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gidget7

Careful... there are lots of folks who sign on here who love this RINO. :-)


13 posted on 12/07/2006 8:59:11 AM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Zenith
Zentith says, "The Agape Press is probably owned by SOROS !"

That sounds like something a Mobyite would say.

14 posted on 12/07/2006 8:59:37 AM PST by Waryone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: johnqueuepublic
Yea, if you consider the NON-RINO Conservatives have yet to announce.
15 posted on 12/07/2006 9:08:50 AM PST by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tinian
The GOP needs a way to win without these fair weather "friends".

It's easy, just elect Democrats petending to be Republicans, worked out really well he last time we had control of both houses and the White House.

In other word tell the party to quit digging up these RINO's and funding them, over real Republicans.

16 posted on 12/07/2006 9:19:53 AM PST by itsahoot (If the GOP does not do something about immigration, immigration will do something about the GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

"...a lot of people just didn't see what we saw here in Massachusetts."

Prove it.


17 posted on 12/07/2006 10:16:51 AM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zenith

Agape Press is a Christian news bureau whose work I like very much but their largely evangelical staff and audience are unlikely to say anything positive about a Mormon candidate. I think there coverage of Romney as been fair but they will certainly not be a cheerleader even if his record were better. I think the attacks on Romney's conservative credentials are legitimate (his record and past statements can't be hidden) but misguided. Like Governor Reagan before him his move to the right is real and his coddling of the left in the past has more to do with circumstance than principle. One does not govern Massachusetts as a conservative, that is a non-starter. I would take Romney's pro-life and anti-gay marriage stands as a Presidential candidate to be as real as Reagan's pro-life presidency despite his pro-choice governorship.


18 posted on 12/07/2006 10:19:01 AM PST by azcap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

let's see...

Reagan was a hollywood Democrat and turned Republican
David Horowitz was a 60s liberal and turned conservative
Michael Medved was a 60s liberal and turned conservative
George W. Bush was an secular alcoholic drug user and turned conservative, and Christian

some people (like GWB) weren't Christians their whole life, does make them 'damaged goods' and unacceptable? and does the same follow for conservatism?


19 posted on 12/07/2006 10:41:21 AM PST by Swordfished
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tinian; Westbrook
Westbrook is right on this.

Conservative Christians are not the fair weather friends here. And Agape Press certainly urged their subscribers to vote. I get news letters from Don Wildmon and I voted. (Would have even if he had advocated sitting out.)

I think what happened is "Christian moderates" and "Christian progressives" voted Democrat. I think it was more of fiscal conservatives who stayed home for spite. As an across the board conservative I have been disenchanted with tax and spend policies which current Republicans seem to share with their Democrat counterparts. But that will not keep me from voting for the best candidate.

Some of the outcome of this election is good though. Democrats are being pressured to move right, even if they only do so kicking and screaming (or only pretend to do so as is likely the case). And Republicans are being purged of some of their more "moderate" members.

I am not happy that this was necessary, but it obviously was. I don't think the Democrats can fool the public for two years into thinking they are conservative, and consequently there should be a swing back to our party.

As for the non-Christian fiscal conservative, who are not moral and social conservatives, I think that is where the biggest part of the blame should go. I have seen so many around this conservative forum advocating drug legalization, sexual immorality, and even saying parents who home educate and teach their children creationism should be thrown in jail and have the children taken away.

These are the fair weather friends who we do not need.
20 posted on 12/07/2006 10:55:20 AM PST by unlearner (You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson