hhhmmmm, i've never gotten that sence from garrett. i must not watch him enough
You're way off. Major Garrett is one of the best their is, and noting that 'victory' is missing from the report was actually a brilliant way to quickly illustrate what appears to be one of the fatal flaw in this report, which is its too low assumptions and ceiling of expectations/options. This report appears to be a manual for withdrawal, not winning. Garrett's question puts the whole report in context.