Ok, tinfoil hat time. With hat firmly affixed, it occurs to me that they have to manufacture some war crimes in order to charge (and prosecute with a kangaroo court) the President with war crimes. I'm sure that instead of sugar plums, visions of a televised execution is dancing through more than a few of these liberal heads (note--I did not say "minds"--they are obviously OUT of those) this Christmas. Yes, I do think they hate him THAT bad...whether they actually try something this grotesque, I can't say.
Liberals believe in "international law". On examination, this doesn't mean law created by a legislative, representive body. It means declarations by fruitbats who represent global elite opinion.
On top of that, since the days of the Nuremberg Trials, the concept of a "war crime" has been so watered down that now any act of war can be defined as a "crime".
Lastly, if Iraq is Vietnam, there needed to be a Mai Lie. This is why Chris Matthews practically jumped out of his chair with excitement when askng Murtha if Haditha was another Mai Lie (of course Murtha said it was).
So now we have a sizeable chunk of the population who believes in fake laws for crimes that weren't committed during an atrocity that never took place.
On places such as Daily Kos, DU, etc., the liberals are salivating over President Bush being dragged off to the Hague at any moment. And you can be sure that he (and Donald Rumsfeld and Condi Rice) will be harrassed with "international" subpeonas for the rest of their lives. If, as Yogi Berra might say, they live that long.
By themselves, the liberal moonbats have little power. But when the mass media represents their viewpoints, the moonbats should not be underestimated.