Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LadyNavyVet
I am not a Six-Day-Earther, but I object to the classical Theory of Evolution being taught as if it wasproven Law. If no one was there to see it, and we have no video tape or first hand evidence, it is just a collection of ideas that partially support a conclusion. There may be a more complex theory that incorporates Biblical scholarship and hard science, but it won't be found by a lazy scientific community that has decided that there is no God, and won't even consider alternatives to what "Survival of the Fittest" has become to be viewed as. When did Science stop being about considering all possibilities?
24 posted on 12/04/2006 9:04:23 AM PST by 50sDad (I respect other religions by allowing them the right to worship. But they still are wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: 50sDad

I have the same objection. Darwinism used to be considered a theory. They even called it the Theory of Evolution. Now, to some, it is at least as much Holy Writ as the Bible is to me.

I'm teaching my kids that there are competing theories, but when they get to college they're only going to hear one side of the story. I tell them to keep an open mind and consider all the evidence, that understanding God, Creation and our place in the universe is the work of a lifetime, and we won't find all the answers here.


27 posted on 12/04/2006 9:12:49 AM PST by LadyNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson