Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Riverman94610
Its like discussing the Constitutionality of Civil Rights Laws with a black person.To me as a white person,I can make some theoretical argument about how the Federal Government may have exceeded its jurisdiction in 1964.To a black person its like,"F Constitutionality.Do you want me and my family to have to go to the back of the bus again?" Things get ugly and objective discussion is silenced.

BTW .. if you approach a discussion like that .. I'm not surprised that you get into an ugly discussion

490 posted on 12/04/2006 4:15:08 PM PST by Mo1 (Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies ]


To: Mo1

The difference is two white guys COULD discuss the Constitutional merits of the law more or less objectively.That is,WE have never had to experience going to a restaurant and being told "we only serve white folks from the back door"
For a black person,its very personal as well as very painful.


505 posted on 12/04/2006 5:23:32 PM PST by Riverman94610
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson