We are removing more people per year today than Ike did.
So why is that held up as exemplary, and Bush as a failure?
Could it be because people are abysmally ignorant?
Ike didn't let several million illegals accumulate in this country during his tenure.
Are we even removing five percent of those who are flooding in? If we are dealing in hard numbers, we must include how many we are not deporting. I would be willing to wager that Ike was removing a lot higher percentage than we are presently.