Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Draft Incompatible With Free Society
HumanEventsOnline ^ | Nov 28, 2006 | Rep. Ron Paul

Posted on 12/03/2006 2:06:26 PM PST by NapkinUser

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 12/03/2006 2:06:30 PM PST by NapkinUser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser; Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; ...
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
2 posted on 12/03/2006 2:12:53 PM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/optimism_nov8th.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

That's true, but that certainly wouldn't stop most politicians from voting for a draft. The reason why a draft won't happen is because it's incompatible with reelection..


3 posted on 12/03/2006 2:12:53 PM PST by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
It is time to abolish the Selective Service System and resign military conscription to the dustbin of American history.

Critter Paul, put a bill before the House to do just that. I'd like to see how many back-peddlers come out of the woodwork.

4 posted on 12/03/2006 2:16:10 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
Ron Paul has been introducing bills to end the draft system for years now (example) but the House leadership never lets it go anywhere.
5 posted on 12/03/2006 2:19:08 PM PST by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Half true. There are a very limited number of people that are true warriors. But a true warrior can kill a hundred non-warriors in battle. And it is based in genetics and talent far more than it is in training.

One of the great myths of the modern era is that you can train a non-warrior to be a warrior. This is false. A trained non-warrior will almost always lose to a real warrior in battle. Technology really doesn't change things much.

Fortunately, the way our modern military is composed, non-warriors outnumber warriors 15 to 1. Non-warriors are just fine supporting warriors. And this is where a draft comes in.

You can draft as many non-warriors as you like to support your warriors, just as long as you don't try and make them fight. If you do, they are cannon fodder.

But your warriors you have to entice into service. And while they cannot be trained to be warriors, they can be trained to be *better* warriors. If you go to war with enough warriors in combat roles, you will do okay in battle.

The trick is to distinguish the two. If you know someone is a non-warrior, then don't waste their time training them with things they could never do as well as a warrior. Train them instead to be better at supporting the warriors you do have.

Vietnam lasted long enough for a natural segregation between the two to happen. Real warriors ended up at the front and often stayed there, reenlisting to stay with their unit. The non-warriors gravitated to the rear, or if they were sent forward, didn't last.

So a draft is fine, if it is non-warriors. Just don't expect it to get too many good warriors, because they are few and far between.


6 posted on 12/03/2006 2:29:00 PM PST by Popocatapetl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

"Compulsory national service, whether in the form of military conscription or make-work programs like AmeriCorps, still sells on Capitol Hill. Conscription is wrongly associated with patriotism, when really it represents collectivism and involuntary servitude."

There are plenty of FR (cough - big government bots - cough) who would love nothing better than to turn many of their fellow citizens into their own slave labor force as "it'll do'em some good."


7 posted on 12/03/2006 2:29:04 PM PST by KantianBurke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

While I agree with Paul's principle this doesn't seem like a good time to make a draft illegal when we have Iran and North Korea breathing down our necks.

I truly believe that over half this country would have to be dragged out from under the bed to fight if we were attacked on a large scale.

We have become a nation of metrosexual whining girlie boys.


8 posted on 12/03/2006 2:29:51 PM PST by Columbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
We need more mercenaries.

Since the US invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, about 20,000 mercenaries have been hired to work as private security contractors. This figure represents one mercenary for every seven uniformed American soldiers in these regions. With $30 billion spent by the US Government on private security contractors in 2004—its largest expenditure in Iraq after oil and construction—the contractors have found a gold mine in the Latin American market.

9 posted on 12/03/2006 2:30:04 PM PST by mjp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Columbine

"While I agree with Paul's principle this doesn't seem like a good time to make a draft illegal when we have Iran and North Korea breathing down our necks."

I heard somebody on Neal Boortz's radio program ask this question:

"Is America worth defending if it can't even get enough volunteers in it's military to fight for it?"

It's a sobering question.


10 posted on 12/03/2006 2:35:28 PM PST by NapkinUser (Tom Tancredo for president of the United States of America in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

A draft has it's place but only in a national emergency....not for the reasons that Rangle Dangle wants it. Clinton ruined our military and it's just now starting to build back up. He hated the military because he couldn't control them and they hated him because he didn't respect them. Hillary even hates them more. One thing for sure, if she becomes President, our military will never go to war. They wouldn't trust her.


11 posted on 12/03/2006 2:38:05 PM PST by Ron2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
I wonder if Paul authored the headline...only because of the exceptions that come to mind...Switzerland being one
12 posted on 12/03/2006 2:41:32 PM PST by stylin19a ("Klaatu Barada Nikto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

"...we simply don't have enough soldiers to invade and occupy every country labeled a threat or deemed ripe for regime change."

The USA does not do this.
Sounds like a communist to me. He lost me with that ridiculous comment.
I am against conscription because this is supposed to be a free country.


13 posted on 12/03/2006 2:49:27 PM PST by gate2wire (Honor Their Sacrifice-Complete The Mission.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popocatapetl

"But your warriors you have to entice into service."

I know a warrior that was "enticed" by the threat of the draft. He actually enlisted for 2 years initially, which was possible--people called it "volunteering" for the draft.

With a draft in effect, many will go ahead and "volunteer."

Anyway, this warrior spent 37 years, reaching Lt. General. Combat Arms.

A true life instance of the draft "enticing" somebody to enter the service. During wartime, of course.

I favor the draft. If you need the draft, it means you are at war, and need a bigger military.

I believe both are now true.

There are a lot of warriors among the draftees.


14 posted on 12/03/2006 2:56:33 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

I think it would send the wrong message to those who would do us harm, but I'd like to see every member of congress go on record, aye or nay.

Of course I'm one of the few who believes we never should have gotten rid of it in the first place.


15 posted on 12/03/2006 2:57:06 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
Is America worth defending if it can't even get enough volunteers in it's military to fight for it?"

Since the hate America first crowd controls K-12 schools, universities, MSM and the popular culture I find it amazing that our armed services regularly meet their recruitment goals.

But, just as Europe is no longer willing to defend itself I suspect we are no more than a generation or two behind. The current uncontested invasion across our southern border is only a prelude, an indication that we are close to abdicating our responsibility to protect this once great nation.

16 posted on 12/03/2006 2:57:43 PM PST by Jacquerie (Great nations are born stoic and die epicurean. Will Durant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker

General Shalikashvili and Elvis were drafted around the same time.


17 posted on 12/03/2006 2:58:41 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
>>So why is the idea of a draft even considered?<<

At the current time its being considered so the Rangel faction can score (he thinks) political points.

But
>>Draft Incompatible With Free Society<<

is only true if you define "free" as not requiring the people to band together for common defense, which frankly is the major underpinning of civilization.

We may not need a draft now and right now it may be political but there may come a time....
18 posted on 12/03/2006 3:01:57 PM PST by gondramB (It wasn't raining when Noah built the ark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
Instead of a trying to eliminate the Selective Service, why doesn't Ron Paul (and the majority of the Congress), reemphasize and through strong support to the Civilian Marksmanship Program (CMP) established in 1903 (http://www.odcmp.com/services/programs/AnnualReportHistory&Mission.pdf)

It would be nice to see a million or more Americans take up the time honored tradition of rifle marksmanship and camaraderie with fellow Americans. The gov't should bring back the hundreds of thousand of M14, M1'S (even old M16's)that are still overseas, convert the M14 and 16s to semi-auto, and offer them for sale to the public, using the proceeds from the sale to establish CMP clubs around the country and building new ranges.

That way Americans are doing something for their country by having fun and gaining skills, and the you people who would be involved might consider joining the military.

Oh well, what was I thinking, America is inhabited primeval by dolts who wouldn't know what end of the barrel the bullet comes out of ... and a congress that wants disarmed sheep to control.
19 posted on 12/03/2006 3:12:59 PM PST by MaDeuce (Do it to them, before they do it to you! (MaDeuce = M2HB .50 BMG))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

I lurk on DU. About half of them support a draft for the America corps-working with the poor, the elderly, etc.
And they want EVERYONE up to the age of 51 to put in 2 years of such crap.

I think the libs would LOVE a draft, but they know it a poison pill until they have a president of their own.


20 posted on 12/03/2006 3:14:28 PM PST by Cyclops08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson