Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justshutupandtakeit
Are you going to answer my question someday? It is premature to call anyone stupid before you yourself have a coherent theory of how Terri was injured. It may be the "Terrinauts" who are wise and you who are stupidly defending a murderer. It depends on what really happened to Terri on February 25, 1990. So tell us what really happened. Let me repeat the question for you:

"... explain to me, please, how a healthy young woman, almost certainly asleep, ended up on the hallway floor, face down, in cardiac arrest and nearly dead, shortly after Michael came home late that Saturday night?

"Your answer has to fit all medical findings including Terri's ER blood testing and the bone scan. Give yourself a bonus if you can explain where and why Michael lied to the police who responded to 911."

You also were going to tell me, quote, "who actually investigated" Terri's injury, and give me their report?

189 posted on 12/05/2006 9:48:05 AM PST by T'wit (Using the right word instead of the almost-right word is like getting laid instead of laid off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: T'wit

The police treated Terri's case as they do other cases. There was no evidence of foul play hence no intensive investigation. People are felled for unknown reasons quite frequently. And they are almost never murdered.

I doubt that Michael "lied" to the police at all. His story may have changed as he considered things or he could have not been accurate initially given the stress of the event. But neither of those involve "lying".


191 posted on 12/05/2006 10:14:24 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson