Skip to comments.
Side Effects at the Pharmacy [Nine states order Wal Mart to raise the price of prescriptions]
New York Times ^
| November 30, 2006
| MILT FREUDENHEIM
Posted on 12/02/2006 10:47:22 AM PST by grundle
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
1
posted on
12/02/2006 10:47:25 AM PST
by
grundle
To: grundle
"Wal-Mart said earlier this week that in nine other states including California, Minnesota and Pennsylvania it had taken 55 drugs off the $4 list and was charging $9 for them in deference to state regulations that prohibit pricing below cost if doing so could drive competing stores out of business."
I thought government was here to help us? LOL
2
posted on
12/02/2006 10:49:38 AM PST
by
headstamp
(Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
To: grundle
I ran down to Wally this morning, and there were 15 or so people in line at 9, which is the time the pharmacy opens....This is unusual, since I pick up my parents' stuff there, and there's usually no backlog.
Interesting if indeed they have to back off so quickly in California.
3
posted on
12/02/2006 10:49:55 AM PST
by
ErnBatavia
(recent nightmare: Googled up "Helen Thomas nude"....)
To: grundle
State regulation at its best. That is if you believe in socialism.
4
posted on
12/02/2006 10:50:44 AM PST
by
pacpam
(action=consequence applies in all cases)
To: grundle
Unbelievable!
5
posted on
12/02/2006 10:50:58 AM PST
by
alice_in_bubbaland
(New Jersey gets the corrupt government it deserves!)
To: pacpam
Is it safe to assume that the States mentioned are Democrat run? What about Minnesota?
6
posted on
12/02/2006 10:52:31 AM PST
by
alice_in_bubbaland
(New Jersey gets the corrupt government it deserves!)
To: grundle
7
posted on
12/02/2006 10:56:59 AM PST
by
deport
To: headstamp
I thought government was here to help us? LOL
Price-fixing is illegal...unless the guvmint is doing it!
8
posted on
12/02/2006 10:58:50 AM PST
by
VOA
To: deport
Thanks for the link and complete list of states.
9
posted on
12/02/2006 11:00:19 AM PST
by
grundle
To: grundle
The big cos., Merck etc. make their $$ selling pills for 1¢ ea. or less, to the distributors. Catch? Ya gotta buy a boatload. The big mark-up comes at the Pharmacy. You won't hear the pols. utter a word about this.
10
posted on
12/02/2006 11:03:09 AM PST
by
Waco
To: deport
The communists in those states better change that law soon or the "gray panthers" will get them voted out of office!
11
posted on
12/02/2006 11:03:17 AM PST
by
Beagle8U
(Charlie Rangel is teaching the "True Conservatives" a lesson......( there really is a difference))
To: headstamp
I thought government was here to help us? LOL Too funny. The government wants lower prescription drug prices so they're mandating higher prices. Eeeeeegsellent.
12
posted on
12/02/2006 11:03:53 AM PST
by
Aquinasfan
(When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
To: grundle
It'd be nice if the Wal-Mart stores in these states posted big signs at their pharmacies explaining why these states are forcing people to be ripped off.
13
posted on
12/02/2006 11:04:52 AM PST
by
pnh102
To: grundle
I dont have a problem with laws preventing businesses from pricing below cost. The reason it is done is not to make money, its to eliminate competition, which in the long run will allow higher prices.
Competition is a good thing.
14
posted on
12/02/2006 11:07:48 AM PST
by
jdub
To: grundle
but I thought we HAVE to socialize health care because of the unbearably high prices of prescription drugs!
To: cake_crumb
Prescription drugs aren't all that expensive. Walmart proved that by ratcheting down the prices to $4. If only 55 of the 300+ drugs they had at $4 were below cost that means that Walmart is still turning a profit on the other 245+ drugs.
The problem isn't that Walmart is pricing them so low. The problem isn't supply and demand where people are willing to pay a markup like that (people will pay any $$ amount for things they truly need). The problem isn't the costs that the drug companies are charging (if they were charging high prices then Walmart couldn't turn a profit on 245+ drugs at $4.00 for 30 days).
No the problem is the stores themselves charging that extra profit on items people need, because people are willing to pay them.
Enter Walmart. Instead of playing the cut the price a dollar, wait till catch up, cut another dollar, rinse and repeat Walmart just went for the throat and said lets get it over with and dropped the price to $4.00 across the board. Easier to do it across the board then it is to take each drug and say "How much for this one? How about this one?"
So the other stores have a choice, call or fold. Target and someone else have called. That means they are turning a profit on at least some of the drugs as well in hopes of at least coming out a wash in the end.
The other stores have the same choice. Call or fold. That's competition. That's capitalism. Not dictating what stores can and cannot charge.
To: Gabz
17
posted on
12/02/2006 11:42:20 AM PST
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: headstamp
do you have gas pumps at any of your Wal Marts? - We do.
Kind of makes you wonder what the guvmint would do if they stated selling gas for a buck.
18
posted on
12/02/2006 11:56:51 AM PST
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: pnh102
I agree. In fact, when I first read the article, I was hoping Wal Mart would place a full page ad in The New York Times explaining it.
19
posted on
12/02/2006 11:58:18 AM PST
by
grundle
To: jdub
There will always be competition. Wal Mart can't make Target disappear.
20
posted on
12/02/2006 11:59:17 AM PST
by
grundle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson