Posted on 12/01/2006 10:35:12 PM PST by FLOutdoorsman
The growing power to change human nature
Science can be a little scary. Its potential to transform life itself has led to predictions that we might re-write our own genetic make-up or merge our minds with machines. But 2007 will show that it is not these sci-fi possibilities that are of immediate concern. Real possibilities of changing our human nature are creeping up from a less obvious direction. More and more drugs developed to treat disease are turning out also to offer the potential to “enhance” the cognitive powers of healthy people, and to push human life expectancy much further, perhaps to 115 years and beyond.
The potential to alter our nature and lifespans elicits strong reactions. The transhumanists—a loose coalition of scientists, technologists and thinkers who seek opportunities to enhance the human condition—see change as desirable. Human nature, says Nick Bostrom, an Oxford University philosopher and advocate of transhumanism, is “a work in progress, a half-baked beginning that we can learn to remould in desirable ways…we shall eventually manage to become posthuman, beings with vastly greater capacities than present human beings have.” Others argue that we will never have sufficient wisdom to make ourselves more than we are. Francis Fukuyama of Johns Hopkins University describes transhumanism as one of “the world’s most dangerous ideas”. But whatever you may think, the possibilities for changing your nature by direct biochemical intervention are arriving now.
There is no greater goal for transhumanism than the conquest of death. Some of the most controversial advocates of technological improvements to humans, including Ray Kurzweil, an American inventor and author, and Aubrey de Grey, a gerontologist and chairman of the Methuselah Foundation, argue optimistically that immortality may become achievable for people who are alive today. But even without the yet-to-be-invented technologies that they say will make this possible, there are good reasons why we can hope to live a lot longer.
Transhumanists question the conventional wisdom that the human lifespan is coming to a natural limit. History shows that every limit announced by experts is quickly overturned. Back in 1928, an American demographer, Louis Dublin, calculated that the upper limit on average life expectancy would be 64.8 years, a daring figure at the time, with American life expectancy then just 57 years. But now his figure looks timid, given that life expectancy for women in Okinawa, Japan, has passed 85.3 years, 20 years more than Dublin claimed possible. Also looking timid are the scientists who later predicted that life expectancy would nowhere pass 78 years (in 1952), 79 years (1980) and 82.5 years (1984).
Can this steady rise in life expectancy be replaced with a giant leap? Many transhumanists think so. We already know that cutting back severely on calories in the diet can give life expectancy a remarkable boost—between 30% and 50%—in a range of animals. Now evidence is emerging not only that this approach may work in humans but also that drugs may provide the benefits of calorie restriction without the pains of the diet.
Life-extension enthusiasts who have been eating just 1,800 calories a day for an average of six years (a healthy Western diet averages 2,700 calories a day) do indeed show signs that their bodily ageing is slowing. Eating far fewer calories does not simply slow metabolism, nor do the advantages come just from being thin, as aggressive calorie-burning exercise does not confer the same benefits. Rather, calorie restriction appears to trigger natural defences designed to boost the chances of survival during periods of food scarcity. As many of those defensive responses are co-ordinated by a set of genes called sirtuins, there is a chance that drugs can be used to trigger their action directly, without the diet. Chemicals that affect sirtuin activity have been found in plants and one, resveratrol, extends lifespan in test animals. In one species of fish, maximum lifespan increased by almost 60%. Humans will be pleased to know that resveratrol occurs naturally in red wine
Efforts to develop sirtuin-targeting drugs and test them for clinical safety are under way, but the companies working on them stress a goal of activating “health-promoting genes”, rather than life-extension itself. That is just too controversial.
The same is true of other drugs that may enhance human capabilities. Modafinil provides an interesting example. The drug was developed to treat narcolepsy and sleep problems but is a hit with healthy people who want to improve their concentration and skip sleep. Modafinil users dramatically improve their ability to solve classic tests of planning ability, like the Tower of London task where sets of coloured discs on pegs have to be moved from one pattern to another in the fewest moves. More than 40 other cognitive enhancement drugs are under study around the world.
Numerous drugs are also in development that may enhance or alter memory. In the brain, memories are coded in patterns of links between nerve cells and are laid down in two stages: the first when the strength of signals between cells is temporarily enhanced and the second when memory is consolidated through the synthesis of new proteins. Ampakine drugs target the first stage, boosting excitatory communication between nerve cells, as well as stimulating brain growth. Results are encouraging, at least for middle-aged rats. Recently scientists found that the drug turned back the clock for a key measure of decline in memory function.
Another drug, propranolol, has the quite different aim of weakening troubling memories. Memories are etched with particular strength in stressful situations, including wars, car accidents and rapes. Later these memories can return as a painful part of post-traumatic stress disorder. Propranolol blocks the impact of stress hormones on memory formation and, if taken very soon after the trauma, turns down the intensity of recall. More surprising is a new drug called ZIP (Zeta Inhibitor Peptide) that makes rats forget everything they learnt recently, without affecting their learning ability. ZIP has not been tested in humans but has the potential to wipe out all new memories.
Transhumanists have been quick to debate where such drugs might lead: not only might they lessen stress disorders, but they could also remove the feeling of guilt by lessening memories of wrongdoing, or dull the pains of love lost. Such possibilities highlight the problems of playing with human nature. We may be more efficient, but without the feelings of others around us.
That leaves us with the great unresolved debate in transhumanism: whether, if we choose to “enhance” ourselves, we can say we are the same person afterwards, and whether that matters. But one thing is certain: whatever ailment drugs may be developed to treat, if they can also be used to provide someone with a competitive advantage, or prolong life, people will take them.
That leaves us with the great unresolved debate in transhumanism: whether, if we choose to “enhance” ourselves, we can say we are the same person afterwards, and whether that matters. But one thing is certain: whatever ailment drugs may be developed to treat, if they can also be used to provide someone with a competitive advantage, or prolong life, people will take them.
I consider myself to be a transhumanist.
Do you have any problem with combing Human DNA with Animal or with Plant DNA to improve your health?
Would you still be 'Human' if you used those products?
Do you have any problem with GM plants that might use Human/Animal DNA with their products?
If you read Kurzweils latest book "The Singularity Is Near" he lays out a convincing argument that we are only a few decades from dramatic life extending breakthroughs.
The trick is to "Live long enough to live forever"
By artificially triggering senses (e.g., why do we enjoy the taste of good food, the sound of music, the sight of a beautiful day?), one could enjoy all the joys of being alive without really being alive.
Quality of life is important as well, IMO. I work in long-term care, and we have people who are in awful shape but keep clinging to life. Also Alzheimer's patients who died by inches. Long life in itself doesn't appeal to me at all.
Carolyn
I'd prefer to be a cyborg. Man-made replacement parts have a longer useful lifespan than organic sources .There is speculation that brain functions from a human will be able to be transferred to a memory bank within the next 25 years . That could entail transferring the "soul" of a human into a zip drive of sort .
And they've found that it takes massive quantities of resveratrol to have the effect. Far too much to be practical for human consumption.
By artificially triggering senses (e.g., why do we enjoy the taste of good food, the sound of music, the sight of a beautiful day?), one could enjoy all the joys of being alive without really being alive.
I wondered if possibly technology will develop to the point of transfering (copying) a persons id to a digital body or a self aware sentience will be formed that in theory could last forever as long as there is a machine to host the "program." Perhaps human legacy will be to create a new digital life that will travel the stars.
Maybe it'll name a street after us.
Tek Wars.... William Shatner was onto something big.
(I can't believe that statement on its face, but one must give credit where it is due.)
Because that intelligence can then evolve its own technology at an exponential pace, well beyond the capability of human understanding.
How do we maintain control of an intelligence far superior to our own ?
BUMP
"So far, significant progress in such things is just science fiction."
Google "Ganesh particle"..... as well as "Project lotus"
use quotation marks.
DR B works for major Pharmi now and you can follow some interesting work being done in the waters of the west coast if you look hard enough.
http://www.eaglesdisobey.net/Q94_pg2.htm
Yes that is the short term holy grail.
After you die your 'soul' could be stored until a cyborg body replacement is available in some distant future.
And travel at the speed of light to a distant star system where it can be re-incorporated.
We need to make time irrelevant.
BUMP
...an up to date day to day account is here:
http://www.neweaglesforum.proboards107.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1159784667&page=9
Been there, done that. Look around. It is ongoing.
http://www.eaglesdisobey.net/wm_corner.htm
Hate to be a killjoy here but I have to wonder what sort of exercise they get. For example if you're working out you need a certain amount of carbs for muscle growth, as well as a healthy amount of protein, etc. If the caloric intake is too low, or imbalanced, you don't increase muscle mass and you weaken while working out or doing cardio. 1800 calories you'd be a stick with no strength I would think
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.