Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraqi forces can take over by June 2007, says PM
Yahoo from Reuters ^ | 30 November 2006 | Tabassum Zakaria and Suleiman al-Khalidi

Posted on 11/30/2006 1:28:19 PM PST by shrinkermd

Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki said on Thursday his government's forces would be able to take over security command from U.S. troops by June 2007 -- a move which could allow the United States to start withdrawing.

"I cannot answer on behalf of the U.S. administration but I can tell you that from our side our forces will be ready by June 2007," Maliki told ABC television after meeting President Bush in Jordan.

Bush offered him strong backing in their talks and said Iraqi forces would be trained more quickly to take over but rejected suggestions he was seeking a "graceful exit" for U.S. troops.

According to a transcript released by ABC, the Iraqi leader said: "At the beginning of next year we will increase the training of our forces ... when they reach an acceptable level, we can talk about transferring power from multinational forces to Iraqi forces.

"I can say that Iraqi forces will be ready, fully ready to receive this command and to command its own forces, and I can tell you that by next June our forces will be ready."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 2007; iraq; takeover
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: jaydubya2

A civil war is a bad thing. Look what happened to Lebanon, once the best places in the Middle East.


61 posted on 12/03/2006 9:41:43 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

Depending on what you consider warriors to be, that 150,000 probably has only about a 10th being actual warriors.


62 posted on 12/03/2006 9:44:41 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker

I agree with you. Best case, of course. IMHO, the failure of the IDF last summer led the Iranians to put stuff into Iraq. The Bush Administration expected the Israelis to kick ass. Unfortunately, they did not.


63 posted on 12/03/2006 9:45:10 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

We could back the Shia PROVIDED that we keep Mookie out of the picture and let the government take the Sunnis to the cleaners and provided that the Shia did not free the Sunnis completely out of the government. My guess is that we have been demanding a hand for them not so much because thy were really a threat but because the Saudis have been behind them.


64 posted on 12/03/2006 9:49:20 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: xzins

And in Vietnam of the 500,000 there about 50,000 were in the field. BTW. the ability of the Third Army to change its front in, what three days, was amazing. Not even the Wehrmacht in its best days could have done that.


65 posted on 12/03/2006 10:07:12 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson