The Secret Gay Network

Accuracy in Media ^ | Nov 29, 2006 | Cliff Kincaid

[Neoliberalnot]

In a major new development confirming our theory that radical gay activists were behind the Mark Foley scandal, the mysterious source responsible for exposing Foley's behavior has been identified as an employee of the Human Rights Campaign. This is the radical homosexual organization that functions as an adjunct of the national Democratic Party...

[Neoliberalnot]

Another score for the deviants.

[traditional1]

Yep....another faggot assault on Conservatives/Republicans....

[Nomorjer Kinov]

Funny how the homo-promo groups realize that regular folks are repulsed by their(homo's) behavior, but use the revealing of that same behavior to oust their enemas (sp!)

[padre35]

So now the republicans may have to literally purge there ranks of anyone who may even have the possibility of being gay.

To not do that would virtually guarantee another Foley type scandal.

[3AngelaD]

The Republican leadership should have taken Foley out way, way before the election, as soon as his activities came to their attention. As a result of their failure to act, this leak came at the worst possible time. They could have managed it; they didn't, and gave the deviants an opportunity to score one, so to speak.

[Wormwood]

So now the republicans may have to literally purge there ranks of anyone who may even have the possibility of being gay.

Shrink yourself into a majority. Brilliant.

[DarthVader]

The Secret Gay Network = MSNBC

[MSF BU]

We'll pick up the Foley seat back up in two years, along with Jeb Bradley's and Weldon's; hopefully in all three case we'll nominate a Reagan-Republican.

[padre35]

Can you see a different, better option?

The exposure to another Foley type thing is very real.

"Was the page 17 or 18 when that text message was sent, the staffer is denying it, saying he was 18..."

That is the media's double standard.

[Rembrandt_fan]

The article read, "...confirming our theory that radical gay activists were behind the Mark Foley scandal."

Mark Foley was behind the Mark Foley scandal. Dem leadership held the information until it could be released for maximum effect. Where was our leadership? Why didn't they play the game more adroitly? Where was that Rovian genius when we needed it most? There has never been a shortage of scandal and corruption among our Democratic opponents. Why wasn't it exploited more effectively? Even the MSM won't turn its back on a story if that story is big enough or juicy enough--most of the time, anyway. Okay, some of the time. Throw enough macaca and eventually it will stick.

It is true Republican incumbents and candidates are held to closer personal scrutiny. It is also true the MSM is hopelessly, liberally biased, and the blatant hypocrisy of Foley's treatment in comparison to Barney Franks and Gary Studds for similar--even near-identical--behaviors is glaringly obvious. However, I don't think it is a bad thing bad eggs like Foley are exposed and ruined. I don't know about you, but I don't want men and women who engage in that kind of thing wearing a GOP lapel pin. Let the Dems have 'em.

[Wormwood]

opefully in all three case we'll nominate a Reagan-Republican.

Me too.

[The Great RJ]

...it's a vast left wing gay conspiracy.

[MSF BU]

I was around when Reagan implemented the "We Ask, Don't Join" policy as regards military sodomites. It worked well and it's really a shame the congress passed a watered down version. As regards the California initiative, it was basically unworkable and because of that warranted defeat.

[Sir Hailstone]

I'm not suprised the deviant leftist 'Rats aren't pointing to people like Fred Phelps and saying "Those people are what the Republicans support!"

[Disambiguator]

I'm not suprised the deviant leftist 'Rats aren't pointing to people like Fred Phelps and saying "Those people are what the Republicans support!"

That is implied every time Phelps is in the news, being shown as a "Christian".

[smoketree]

They keep saying they are "normal" and homosexuality is so "normal" and then out someone in order to get that deviant out of politics.
Will the adults please show up.

[CyberAnt]

Another score for the liars - there's no such thing as the "Democratic" party. It's the DEMOCRAT PARTY. And yes, there is a BIG BIG difference.

[Thommas]

It's the DEMOCRAT PARTY!

Exactly. It's the MSM that insidiously warps this construct into the vernacular and thereby inflicts another hammer stroke onto the foundation of our culture.

[knews_hound]

I called it The Worst October Surprise EVER at the time,  and many agreed.

It makes more sense now.

This was not the doing of the DNC, but rather, an attempt by an organized pro-gay group to influence the election.

I agree with many who ask, where was the Republican Leadership on this?

Why were these guys allowed onto those particular committees?  What other skeletons are out there just waiting for a disgruntled staffer to reveal.

A housecleaning is in order IMHO.

Cheers,

knewshound

http://www.knewshound.blogspot.com/

[carola]

Gerry Studds actually had sex with a page who was a minor, got a slap on the wrist and was welcomed back to the House for five more terms. Could anyone (pre-Foley) be faulted for thinking that a standard had been set?

Years later, Foley clumsily flirted with pages and exchanged salacious IM's with a former page who was at the time over 18 years old. Brian Ross reported it as the scandal of the year and posted the IM's on ABC's web site, but conveniently left out the part about the page being an 18-year-old former page.

I think this was a well-planned hit job by gay activists and the MSM.