Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SAJ
ANY voluntary behaviour could (and would, ultimately) become grounds for dismissal if this lot go on unchecked.

Anything they deem might someday affect your insurance payout would be fair game to prohibit in off hours. In fact, sitting around in a chair typing in a web forum in your private time and not exercising instead would be one. I suppose you will need to install a monitor on your CPU or your chair or body to see how long you spend sedentary during your off hours.

It is a short step from prohibiting behavior on the basis of healthcare costs...to requiring behavior on the basis of healthcare costs.
61 posted on 11/29/2006 4:25:05 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Arkinsaw
Ahhhh....you have found the key. It is a short step, from, "You must not..." to "You must..."

Nobody around here seems to get that.

90 posted on 11/29/2006 5:10:19 PM PST by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: Arkinsaw
It is a short step from prohibiting behavior on the basis of health care costs...to requiring behavior on the basis of health care costs.

If the employer pays 100% for your Health Care, everything included, than maybe they can set down some rules of healthy living so to speak.
If you are required to pay co-payments the deal is off, period! IMHO!

137 posted on 11/29/2006 7:59:45 PM PST by danmar (Tomorrow's life is too late. Live today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson