Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NEPA
No doubt that it is legal. The question is "Is it right?" An entirely different thing. I am a major proponent of companies doing the right thing as well as the legal thing.

One of those right things is not to change the rules after the game has begun. Another is not doing what they did to you.

One of the things I have learned over the years is that the corporate culture is at least as important as what you make for building a successful company. The thought process behind this move is troubling.

If I had any funds invested with Scott I would be pulling them about now.

101 posted on 11/29/2006 5:19:16 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Those who call their fellow citizens Sheeple are just ticked they were not chosen as Shepherds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: Harmless Teddy Bear

You make a valid point. Now, how about employees? Should they be required to continue to work for an employer after, say, they receive expensive training? If an employee disagrees with an employer's political beliefs, should he be required to continue to work for the employer? If a boss takes up smoking (during after work hours only), must all employees continue to work for this boss, or should they be allowed to quit if they don't approve of smoking?

Most people have NO trouble with employees who discriminate. Most people, even conservatives, ignore the property rights aspects of this discussion. Employers own the business, and should be allowed to do with it what they please.


119 posted on 11/29/2006 5:51:11 PM PST by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson