Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexKat
In New York on Tuesday, U.N. Security Council voted unanimously to extend for one year the mandate of the 160,000-strong multinational force in Iraq.

What the heck is this supposed to mean? The U.N. Security Council had a mandate in place for a 160,000-strong multinational force that it never authorized in the first place?!

9 posted on 11/29/2006 7:49:33 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
The U.N. Security Council had a mandate in place for a 160,000-strong multinational force that it never authorized in the first place?!

You are catching on. The media told you that the UN did not "authorize" the forces. Fact of the matter is, the UN mandated the forces, AND the troop levels. Those that blame the President regarding troop levels are indeed misguided. The UN and NATO are calling more of the shots than the cheerleaders want to admit. But if one points this out, they are castigated as a terrorist sympathizer and a cut-n-runner for not blindly supporting Shiite Hezbullah via Maliki and Mookie.

10 posted on 11/29/2006 8:00:43 AM PST by ARealMothersSonForever (We shall never forget the atrocities of September 11, 2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson