Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC Hypes Epidemic of Extreme Jobs Burning 70 Hours/Week
Business & Media Institute ^ | Nov. 28, 2006 | Ken Shepherd

Posted on 11/28/2006 11:10:16 AM PST by freemarket_kenshepherd

American laborers are “going to extremes” working in jobs “where 60 hours a week can be considered part-time, and overtime is an understatement.”

That’s how ABC anchor Charles Gibson teased a story in the opening credits of the November 27 “World News.” Yet for all the hype, fewer than one percent of Americans hold these type of “extreme” jobs, and most are well-compensated.

The “so-called extreme jobs,” Gibson told viewers, involve “high-pressure work that often comes with a very high salary and a very heavy personal toll.” Yet it’s only about “2 million Americans” that “fall into this fast-growing category,” Gibson conceded as he introduced a report by Betsy Stark.

In a nation of roughly 300 million people, that’s only 0.67 percent of the country’s population, although Stark’s report made “extreme” work sound like a pandemic.

What’s more, Gibson got his 2 million number by rounding up from the 1.7 million Americans in “extreme” jobs as determined by the New York-based Center for Work-Life Policy (CWLP). Stark featured CWLP senior fellow Catherine Orenstein in her story but did not mention the organization’s name or its ideological leanings.

A review of CWLP’s Web site shows the group often focuses on traditional liberal workplace concerns such as the number of women and minorities in executive leadership in American business. Liberal activist and Princeton religion professor Cornel West serves as CWLP vice president. In 2001, West resigned his post at Harvard University after then-president Larry Summers criticized West for focusing on political activities at the expense of his academic obligations.

Stark chose a Florida lawyer as a textbook case of the “extreme” worker. The correspondent profiled 35-year old David Shontz, a “man who rarely vacations,” who is “a trial lawyer hoping to make partner at his firm..."

(Excerpt) Read more at businessandmedia.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abc; liberalbias; triallawyers; work
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: durasell
Trouble is, the vast majority of people just want a job where they go in at nine, go home at five, and get to spend time with the family, etc.

No one's stopping them.

I could still be working those hours now, but I took a less remunerative but also less time-consuming position to spend more time with my wife and kids.

But the five years I spent in the workforce before getting married, I worked most of the time I was awake.

And I've got a better job now because of it.

90% of the people who work these kind of jobs are unmarried 20something singles in large cities anyway.

41 posted on 11/28/2006 12:12:55 PM PST by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: freemarket_kenshepherd

I enjoy telling people in other countries about the American work ethic. The reason we get ahead, I explain, is that we work very hard. "America is the land of opportunity to work your tushie off."

And to join clubs, send your kids to private schools, own a bunch of nifty stuff as a result of your work.

This raises eyebrows, especially in commie countries where no one is allowed to work much or to own much. Castro, for example, tells the poor beleagured Cubans that in America, some people have to work two or three jobs. Rotten capitalist pigs. Soon they'll own three apartment houses in downtown Cleveland.


42 posted on 11/28/2006 12:14:54 PM PST by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

That's all true. But the thing is, many still have that expectation of the high paying, 40-hour work week.


43 posted on 11/28/2006 12:16:19 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: antti tuuri

The only people I have seen get paid extra for working more hours were hourly employees.

You get paid for the quality of work, not the amount of time you sit in a chair. Most of the 60 hour employees I have known worked that much to hide their incompetence.


44 posted on 11/28/2006 12:16:40 PM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: randog

You don't get rich working 40 hours a week.


Although I am in the military where more than 40 hours are common. That does not guarantee rich. I just got my monthly statement for November and made before tax 57k. So max I will make a little over 60 for the year. It is ok though. I am comfortable. I do understand that if you own you own business you must work in order to have it successful and so you can put food on the table. I wish you best of luck in your quest to become rich, but have fun too!!! I am glad to see you take occasional breathers to hang out with your FRiends!!!!!


45 posted on 11/28/2006 12:18:59 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

The work loads are much greater now for most decent paying jobs. Just over the last couple of years I've seen some mid-sized companies cut nearly a third of its employees and still maintain productivity. Some of that gain is via technology, but not all of it.


46 posted on 11/28/2006 12:19:26 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

Zig Ziglar used the analogy of flight: you have to rev the engine quite a bit to get off the ground, but once you hit cruising altitude you have to ease back ou you'll cook it.


47 posted on 11/28/2006 12:20:36 PM PST by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca, Deport all illegals, abolish the IRS, ATF and DEA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: durasell
Trouble is, the vast majority of people just want a job where they go in at nine, go home at five, and get to spend time with the family, etc.

We all make our choices. I don't have issues with people who want to work 70 hours + per week. I've done it and to me it wasn't worth it. I hardly ever saw my family and when I did, I was too tired to enjoy the time I had with them.

Believe me, I have no trouble working reasonable hours (40-50 hours per week) and spending time with my family and doing things that I really enjoy.I got to coach my kids' ball teams (football, baseball and basketball), attend their school activities, spend quality time with my wife, eat supper together as a family, socialize with friends. To each their own!

48 posted on 11/28/2006 12:21:16 PM PST by rochester_veteran (born and raised in rachacha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: freemarket_kenshepherd
Stark chose a Florida lawyer as a textbook case of the “extreme” worker.

Two words - billable hours

(whether he works as many hours as he bills is a guess)

49 posted on 11/28/2006 12:21:50 PM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: durasell
many still have that expectation of the high paying, 40-hour work week

They certainly do, but it's kind of a spoiled expectation.

Historically, such jobs are complete anomalies.

50 posted on 11/28/2006 12:22:51 PM PST by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: freemarket_kenshepherd

Thank god I live in Europe.


51 posted on 11/28/2006 12:25:32 PM PST by cicero106
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

So, the question is: will the trend work its way down to the foodchain? Will it take 60 hours a week to earn $40k or $50k?


52 posted on 11/28/2006 12:25:51 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: durasell
Will it take 60 hours a week to earn $40k or $50k?

Yes, if you have an H1-B...

53 posted on 11/28/2006 12:27:13 PM PST by null and void (To succeed in life, you need three things: a wishbone, a backbone and a funnybone. --Reba McEntire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: freemarket_kenshepherd

You have to understand: 70 hours per week, or even 60, is A LOT to a TV journalist.


54 posted on 11/28/2006 12:27:26 PM PST by vamoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freemarket_kenshepherd

55 posted on 11/28/2006 12:29:03 PM PST by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

You're joking, but in a lot of tech jobs the H1-B is the baseline. "Hey, you don't want to work hard for the salary we're offering, I know where to find someone who will."


56 posted on 11/28/2006 12:29:39 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: freemarket_kenshepherd
Does it ever enter these bleeding-heart types that these people choose to do this work and put in these hours?

My answer is a big, "So what?" What do you propose? Should long hours, at the discretion of the worker, be illegal? Should it be mandated that everyone be paid the same, regardless of hours worked?

What, o' brilliant author, is your bloomin' point!?

57 posted on 11/28/2006 12:30:40 PM PST by TChris (We scoff at honor and are shocked to find traitors among us. - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freemarket_kenshepherd

They are trying to tell me putting in 60 to 70 per week is a problem? Great, now I'll hear "we're from the gooberment and we're here to help, we insist that you go home now...."

Economy in the tank, just like France. Neeeeeaat!


58 posted on 11/28/2006 12:30:57 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: durasell
I guess my point is that even during the narrow window of the 1950s to 1970s when 9-5s could be quite lucrative, top lawyers and doctors and financiers already worked serious hours.

I don't think it will take 60-hour weeks to earn 40 or 50K.

The question really is: how many people will be satisified with that much money?

The ambitious will always work more.

59 posted on 11/28/2006 12:31:23 PM PST by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

A highly familiar pattern! LOL!


60 posted on 11/28/2006 12:32:30 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson