Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JCEccles
If they had been more competitive or could have been made competitive, Romney likely would have spent money on them. They likely weren't, so he didn't.

The only problem with your fairy tale theory is that Mitt DID invest in a whole bunch of losers in 2004. So much for his keen assessment of risk. In 2006, he didn't invest in Massachusetts, but he did invest nationally -- in winners, losers? doesn't really matter, because he was really investing in himself and his own run for president.

27 posted on 11/27/2006 5:35:32 PM PST by JohnnyZ ("I respect and will protect a woman's right to choose" -- Mitt Romney, April 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: JohnnyZ

Dear JohnnyZ,

"In 2006, he didn't invest in Massachusetts, but he did invest nationally -- in winners, losers? doesn't really matter, because he was really investing in himself and his own run for president."

Are you suggesting that Gov. Romney might be acting... CYNICALLY???

My word! How could you think such a thing??


sitetest


30 posted on 11/27/2006 6:01:37 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson