Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Embassy Asks Bush Twins to Leave Country
ABC News ^ | November 27, 2006 | Joe Goldman and Rhonda Schwartz

Posted on 11/27/2006 11:30:43 AM PST by West Coast Conservative

Amid a growing barrage of front-page headlines, U.S. embassy officials "strongly suggested" President Bush's twin daughters, Jenna and Barbara Bush, cut short their trip to Buenos Aires because of security issues, U.S. diplomatic and security sources tell ABC News.

But the girls have stayed on, celebrating their 25th birthday over the weekend and producing even more headlines about their activities.

Officials say the media coverage upstaged publicity plans for the new U.S. Ambassador Anthony Wayne, who had only recently arrived in the country.

Neither the White House nor the U.S. embassy in Buenos Aires responded to requests for comment.

The Argentinean press blitz followed a report on "The Blotter" last week that Barbara Bush's purse and cell phone were stolen last weekend while dining at the popular San Telmo outdoor marketplace despite being guarded by the Secret Service.

Stories of the twins' visit took on wild proportions in the Argentinean press. One tabloid headline had the young women running nude in the hallway of their hotel, a report the hotel staff denied to ABC News.

According to sources, the U.S. embassy encouraged the two girls to cut their stay short because the added attention was making their security very difficult.

But to the dismay and anger of some U.S. embassy and security staff, the girls stayed on.

Thursday night, an ABC News producer was able to walk into their hotel unchecked and engage Barbara Bush in conversation while she checked her e-mail on a computer in the lobby. Jenna sat talking with friends on a sofa nearby. No Secret Service agents were anywhere to be seen in the lobby, according to ABC News' Joe Goldman.

And yesterday the Bush twins were spotted at the Sunday soccer matches, wearing team jerseys and sitting in the owner's box, watching Argentina's top team Boca Juniors compete. Several games have been canceled due to violence in the crowds this year. In fact, last weekend no spectators were allowed to attend the match other than season ticket holders.

Sources tell ABC News the twins plan to stick to their original itinerary and stay in Buenos Aires until Thursday.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: argentina; barbarabush; bushtwins; jennabush; roguestatedepartment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 441-448 next last
To: cookcounty

It was Jenna during the campaign. Pretty funny picture.


361 posted on 11/27/2006 8:15:28 PM PST by Accygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe; donna
Did you read my post? We were discussing the lack of credibility of the article before post 200 and most of the comments prior to that were in response to donna's posts.

In scanning through, there were just a handful of posts 'cheering them on.' You seem to be determined to find fault where none exists. Is there a reason for that?

362 posted on 11/27/2006 8:15:54 PM PST by ohioWfan (President Bush - courageously and honorably protecting us in dangerous times, . Praise the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: durasell

Is there something seriously wrong with you? I mean it. Is there?


363 posted on 11/27/2006 8:16:40 PM PST by ohioWfan (President Bush - courageously and honorably protecting us in dangerous times, . Praise the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: durasell

Can you please point out what they did that was weong? Or do you just enjoy sarcasm???


364 posted on 11/27/2006 8:17:22 PM PST by sissyjane (Don't be stuck on stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

I understand it well thank you for repeating it what now 20 times.


365 posted on 11/27/2006 8:17:48 PM PST by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan; sissyjane

I do like sarcasm sometimes.

But to be truthful, I am trying to figure out the all out defense of the girls. I have rarely seen pols defended so vigilantly.

It's an interesting phenom.


366 posted on 11/27/2006 8:24:27 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

I understand it well thank you for repeating it what now 20 times.





On wednesdays they serve pudding...


367 posted on 11/27/2006 8:25:23 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; ohioWfan; ilovew

On my local ABC network channel news, they just reported the disclaimer by the State Dept. that the twins were asked to leave .. and showed tape of them with friends, laughing and watching the soccer game ... LOL.


368 posted on 11/27/2006 8:25:34 PM PST by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

Perhaps you can explain sometime why then, you keep repeating something that you know is not true...


369 posted on 11/27/2006 8:25:38 PM PST by ohioWfan (President Bush - courageously and honorably protecting us in dangerous times, . Praise the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: durasell

Please read post #242. There is no truth to the premise of this thread.

The Bush daughters did not get asked to leave. They are not misbehaving. What don't you get?


370 posted on 11/27/2006 8:26:37 PM PST by sissyjane (Don't be stuck on stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Did you read my post? We were discussing the lack of credibility of the article before post 200 and most of the comments prior to that were in response to donna's posts. In scanning through, there were just a handful of posts 'cheering them on.' You seem to be determined to find fault where none exists. Is there a reason for that?

No I never saw it. You see I begin reading threads article first then in numerical order usually. What happened was I saw a few and where they were headed {the cheer leading for staying} and responded. I was quite mad but not because of praise for the Bush twins. I could care less about such stuff. I posted in anger because adults who should know better were cheering what looked like an irresponsible act on.

Then I did a quick check at my pings a minute or two later and saw the recent reply so I checked it intending to go back and catch up afterward. I stopped reading the thread at that point except for current post as the info had been updated.

371 posted on 11/27/2006 8:27:00 PM PST by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: durasell
Wow, many dads would love this deal!! Of course, their twenty-five year old daughters wouldn't, which is why there's no change in hell that Dubya's vetoing his adult daughters' boyfriends. However, the prospect of having to meet your girlfriend's father, the President, is probably enough to scare off many boys.
372 posted on 11/27/2006 8:27:47 PM PST by Accygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane

I'm beyond caring about that -- it's the absolute, unflappable defense of them that's fascinating.


373 posted on 11/27/2006 8:28:30 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Perhaps you can explain sometime why then, you keep repeating something that you know is not true...

Perhaps you can explain whay a professor has so much spare time. One I know puts in 16-18 days and not on the internet either.

374 posted on 11/27/2006 8:29:41 PM PST by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Perhaps you can explain sometime why then, you keep repeating something that you know is not true...

Perhaps you can explain whay a professor has so much spare time. One I know puts in 16-18 hour days and not on the internet either.

375 posted on 11/27/2006 8:29:58 PM PST by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: durasell

I give up--you really are dense.

I think you must have slept on rollers too long. Your head has dents in it.


376 posted on 11/27/2006 8:30:05 PM PST by sissyjane (Don't be stuck on stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: Accygirl

I would tend to believe the Bush girls fish in a small pond.


377 posted on 11/27/2006 8:30:15 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: durasell
Perhaps the defense is based on the fact that there was nothing to be criticizing them for.

There is nothing quite so effective as false accusations to rile the protective instinct of decent people.

Then again, it might be that people are so sick of those on this forum who have been so unbelieveably ruthless and cruel in their attacks on the President in the past weeks that attacking his daughters was just too much.

btw, your 'sarcasm' is bizarre. What in heaven's name did you mean by pudding? You seem like you need medication.......

378 posted on 11/27/2006 8:39:38 PM PST by ohioWfan (President Bush - courageously and honorably protecting us in dangerous times, . Praise the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

The pudding thing was a joke, a poor one. Apologies.

In all seriousness. And I truly am interested. Is the defense of the girls related to the attacks on the President or do they occupy a place in pop culture that I wasn't aware of?


379 posted on 11/27/2006 8:42:15 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
Interesting dodge. No answer to my question, but turning it nonsensically into an attack on me.

I have right near me papers that I have been grading throughout the day, and a final that I have been preparing to give next week.

As with most intelligent people, I am capable of multi-tasking, and responding to folks like you requires very little mental energy.

Thorough enough explanation for you?

380 posted on 11/27/2006 8:42:56 PM PST by ohioWfan (President Bush - courageously and honorably protecting us in dangerous times, . Praise the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 441-448 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson