Skip to comments.
U.S. Embassy Asks Bush Twins to Leave Country
ABC News ^
| November 27, 2006
| Joe Goldman and Rhonda Schwartz
Posted on 11/27/2006 11:30:43 AM PST by West Coast Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400 ... 441-448 next last
To: cookcounty
It was Jenna during the campaign. Pretty funny picture.
To: cva66snipe; donna
Did you read my post? We were discussing the lack of credibility of the article before post 200 and most of the comments prior to that were in response to donna's posts.
In scanning through, there were just a handful of posts 'cheering them on.' You seem to be determined to find fault where none exists. Is there a reason for that?
362
posted on
11/27/2006 8:15:54 PM PST
by
ohioWfan
(President Bush - courageously and honorably protecting us in dangerous times, . Praise the Lord!)
To: durasell
Is there something seriously wrong with you? I mean it. Is there?
363
posted on
11/27/2006 8:16:40 PM PST
by
ohioWfan
(President Bush - courageously and honorably protecting us in dangerous times, . Praise the Lord!)
To: durasell
Can you please point out what they did that was weong? Or do you just enjoy sarcasm???
364
posted on
11/27/2006 8:17:22 PM PST
by
sissyjane
(Don't be stuck on stupid!)
To: ohioWfan
I understand it well thank you for repeating it what now 20 times.
365
posted on
11/27/2006 8:17:48 PM PST
by
cva66snipe
(If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
To: ohioWfan; sissyjane
I do like sarcasm sometimes.
But to be truthful, I am trying to figure out the all out defense of the girls. I have rarely seen pols defended so vigilantly.
It's an interesting phenom.
366
posted on
11/27/2006 8:24:27 PM PST
by
durasell
(!)
To: cva66snipe
I understand it well thank you for repeating it what now 20 times.
On wednesdays they serve pudding...
367
posted on
11/27/2006 8:25:23 PM PST
by
durasell
(!)
To: Mo1; ohioWfan; ilovew
On my local ABC network channel news, they just reported the disclaimer by the State Dept. that the twins were asked to leave .. and showed tape of them with friends, laughing and watching the soccer game ... LOL.
368
posted on
11/27/2006 8:25:34 PM PST
by
STARWISE
(They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
To: cva66snipe
Perhaps you can explain sometime why then, you keep repeating something that you know is not true...
369
posted on
11/27/2006 8:25:38 PM PST
by
ohioWfan
(President Bush - courageously and honorably protecting us in dangerous times, . Praise the Lord!)
To: durasell
Please read post #242. There is no truth to the premise of this thread.
The Bush daughters did not get asked to leave. They are not misbehaving. What don't you get?
370
posted on
11/27/2006 8:26:37 PM PST
by
sissyjane
(Don't be stuck on stupid!)
To: ohioWfan
Did you read my post? We were discussing the lack of credibility of the article before post 200 and most of the comments prior to that were in response to donna's posts. In scanning through, there were just a handful of posts 'cheering them on.' You seem to be determined to find fault where none exists. Is there a reason for that? No I never saw it. You see I begin reading threads article first then in numerical order usually. What happened was I saw a few and where they were headed {the cheer leading for staying} and responded. I was quite mad but not because of praise for the Bush twins. I could care less about such stuff. I posted in anger because adults who should know better were cheering what looked like an irresponsible act on.
Then I did a quick check at my pings a minute or two later and saw the recent reply so I checked it intending to go back and catch up afterward. I stopped reading the thread at that point except for current post as the info had been updated.
371
posted on
11/27/2006 8:27:00 PM PST
by
cva66snipe
(If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
To: durasell
Wow, many dads would love this deal!! Of course, their twenty-five year old daughters wouldn't, which is why there's no change in hell that Dubya's vetoing his adult daughters' boyfriends. However, the prospect of having to meet your girlfriend's father, the President, is probably enough to scare off many boys.
To: sissyjane
I'm beyond caring about that -- it's the absolute, unflappable defense of them that's fascinating.
373
posted on
11/27/2006 8:28:30 PM PST
by
durasell
(!)
To: ohioWfan
Perhaps you can explain sometime why then, you keep repeating something that you know is not true... Perhaps you can explain whay a professor has so much spare time. One I know puts in 16-18 days and not on the internet either.
374
posted on
11/27/2006 8:29:41 PM PST
by
cva66snipe
(If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
To: ohioWfan
Perhaps you can explain sometime why then, you keep repeating something that you know is not true... Perhaps you can explain whay a professor has so much spare time. One I know puts in 16-18 hour days and not on the internet either.
375
posted on
11/27/2006 8:29:58 PM PST
by
cva66snipe
(If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
To: durasell
I give up--you really are dense.
I think you must have slept on rollers too long. Your head has dents in it.
376
posted on
11/27/2006 8:30:05 PM PST
by
sissyjane
(Don't be stuck on stupid!)
To: Accygirl
I would tend to believe the Bush girls fish in a small pond.
377
posted on
11/27/2006 8:30:15 PM PST
by
durasell
(!)
To: durasell
Perhaps the defense is based on the fact that there was nothing to be criticizing them for.
There is nothing quite so effective as false accusations to rile the protective instinct of decent people.
Then again, it might be that people are so sick of those on this forum who have been so unbelieveably ruthless and cruel in their attacks on the President in the past weeks that attacking his daughters was just too much.
btw, your 'sarcasm' is bizarre. What in heaven's name did you mean by pudding? You seem like you need medication.......
378
posted on
11/27/2006 8:39:38 PM PST
by
ohioWfan
(President Bush - courageously and honorably protecting us in dangerous times, . Praise the Lord!)
To: ohioWfan
The pudding thing was a joke, a poor one. Apologies.
In all seriousness. And I truly am interested. Is the defense of the girls related to the attacks on the President or do they occupy a place in pop culture that I wasn't aware of?
379
posted on
11/27/2006 8:42:15 PM PST
by
durasell
(!)
To: cva66snipe
Interesting dodge. No answer to my question, but turning it nonsensically into an attack on me.
I have right near me papers that I have been grading throughout the day, and a final that I have been preparing to give next week.
As with most intelligent people, I am capable of multi-tasking, and responding to folks like you requires very little mental energy.
Thorough enough explanation for you?
380
posted on
11/27/2006 8:42:56 PM PST
by
ohioWfan
(President Bush - courageously and honorably protecting us in dangerous times, . Praise the Lord!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400 ... 441-448 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson