Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newly Elected Pro Abortion Congressman ARCURI is honored in Church
Observer Dispatch | Novemeber 26, 2006 | Observer Dispatch

Posted on 11/27/2006 4:54:01 AM PST by RightoLIfe

The Observer Dispatch reported Sunday that newly elected Congressman, Michael Arcuri, was honored after Mass for his service to the Church.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: abortion; arcuri; catholic; congress; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
Contrary to stated policy of the Diocese of Syracuse, Rev Rose invited or allowed Michael Arcuri to be honored at Mt Carmel Church. In a letter to Clergy, Religious and Laity of the Diocese of Syracuse on November 20th 2003, Bishop Moynihan forbid, "any person who publicly supports abortion or holds that abortion is a right or a matter of choice, may not be invited to speak at diocesan functions or in diocesan/parish facilities (except at an academic symposium where both sides of the issue can be fairly presented). Neither may such inidividuals be appointed special ministers of the Eucharist, serve as lectors in Church, nor be otherwise honored by the church. Oneida County Right to Life has demanded an apology from Rev Rose of Mt. Carmel for the scandal and confusion this has caused. American Bishops in union with the Holy See have stated recently (again) that those who are not in conformity with Catholic teaching should refrain from receiving Communion.
1 posted on 11/27/2006 4:54:06 AM PST by RightoLIfe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightoLIfe

well God forbid anyone pro-abortion ever be considered of capable of doing good things!


2 posted on 11/27/2006 4:59:53 AM PST by HHKrepublican_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2

good things or not, the Catholic Church should not laud those who break with its teaching. let the secular world praise him for whatever good he may do. it is time for the Church to call out those who work at cross purposes with Church teaching.


3 posted on 11/27/2006 5:01:53 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy
the Catholic Church should not laud those who break with its teaching

Paging Ted Kennedy, paging Ted Kennedy...

4 posted on 11/27/2006 5:03:31 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightoLIfe

The parishioners should have got up and walked out. That message would have been heard loud and clear.


5 posted on 11/27/2006 5:05:58 AM PST by KenmcG414
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

you know, several years back i was at the Shrine of the Immaculate Conception here in DC, helping to chaperone my then Kindergartener's field trip and i saw him there [they were just opening the new JP2 center there] and i exclaimed aloud that i was expecting a thunderbolt from the sky at any minute.


6 posted on 11/27/2006 5:08:42 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RightoLIfe; drstevej; Gamecock; Jean Chauvin; OrthodoxPresbyterian; CCWoody; Wrigley; jboot; ...

I AM NOT CATHOLIC BASHING!

INSTEAD OF A RICK WARREN PING LIST,MAYBE A "ASHAMED OF THE GOSPEL PING LIST"

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1744480/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1744418/posts

7 SOLAS!


7 posted on 11/27/2006 5:12:31 AM PST by alpha-8-25-02 ("SAVED BY GRACE AND GRACE ALONE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy
good things or not, the Catholic Church should not laud those who break with its teaching. let the secular world praise him for whatever good he may do. it is time for the Church to call out those who work at cross purposes with Church teaching.

All churches need to start using their power to excommunicate members who support immoral acts especially ones who hold elected office. I'm not just saying the Catholic I'm saying all of them. The Christian Churches also need to openly denounce Apostate Churches such as the most liberal ones like United Church of Christ.

8 posted on 11/27/2006 5:25:48 AM PST by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

exactly. stop letting them hide behind the mantle of their religious faith, when clearly they are members of their respective faiths IN NAME ONLY.


9 posted on 11/27/2006 5:29:00 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2

"well God forbid anyone pro-abortion ever be considered of capable of doing good things!"

Abortion is one of those dogmas that are absolute. Satan is also willing to give you a worldly win so he can give you the boils to go with it.

I'm not saying that pro-abortionists are Satan, just that there is no good done with an unredeemed wrong fixed in place.


10 posted on 11/27/2006 6:02:33 AM PST by OpusatFR ( ALEA IACTA EST. We have just crossed the Rubicon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RightoLIfe

Why does not the Catholic Bishops practice what it preaches?

What is Cardinal Roger Mahony's position on this issue?


11 posted on 11/27/2006 6:06:03 AM PST by ethics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2

You can't possibly be serious?


12 posted on 11/27/2006 6:35:42 AM PST by vpintheak (Yep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RightoLIfe

It is impossible to find a single human on the planet that hasn't done something right at least a few times in life. Nevertheless, murdering the most defenseless in society for profit is a barbaric practice deserving of condemnation by all sentient beings.


13 posted on 11/27/2006 6:47:47 AM PST by Neoliberalnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vpintheak

No Im not entirley serious, however some of the reactions here show that maybe i shouldve been serious.


14 posted on 11/27/2006 6:48:37 AM PST by HHKrepublican_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2

You're right, I mean Hitler liked dogs.


15 posted on 11/27/2006 6:49:02 AM PST by Rumple4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2

it strikes you as unreasonable that adherents of a faith propose to hold lawmakers of that same faith to the tenets thereof? let the kiwanis club fete him for his good deeds, or the Italian-American club, if they are so inclined. It is not appropriate for the Church to laud him when he is NOT IN COMMUNION with the Church.


16 posted on 11/27/2006 6:54:23 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

"it strikes you as unreasonable that adherents of a faith propose to hold lawmakers of that same faith to the tenets thereof?"

As long as they aren't surprised when the populace won't elect them. I do not want my legislators to legislate based on a faith I do not hold. I support the death penalty; if a Catholic politician follows the increasing voice of his church to strike it down, he loses my vote. That's just one example.

And a Southern Baptist who tries to bring back Prohibition is out of the question.


17 posted on 11/27/2006 6:57:23 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003

The Catholic Catechism provides for the death penalty. Vote for whomever you please. Catholics in name only who hold office should be unmasked as such. I vote for lawmakers who best represent my views irrespective of their faith. One cannot be Catholic and vote prochoice. One can only be catholic in name only, in such an instance.


18 posted on 11/27/2006 7:01:48 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

Well, the bishops keep clearing their throats about it, whatever the Catechism says. I also vote for those who represent my interests, irrespective of faith, but you are proposing a situation in which I might have to automatically not consider people of certain faiths.


19 posted on 11/27/2006 7:21:18 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003

if you are prochoice and vote on that basis then by all means vote for those candidates who share your view. Catholics, authentic catholics, do not share that view and if that means you vote against them on that basis, so be it. I am telling you that the Catholic Catechism provides for the death penalty, Catholic bishops spew a lot of crap, unfortunately. i have no problem with people who are prochoice, i DO have problems with people who try to pass themselves off as Catholics who are prochoice.


20 posted on 11/27/2006 7:28:34 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson