Posted on 11/24/2006 8:10:17 PM PST by FairOpinion
Quietly encouraged by the Schwarzenegger administration, a lot of pundits nevertheless have been pushing this idea of an Arnold Way for the Beltway. But conservatives - the ones who would actually have to change their course under the Arnold Way — aren't buying it.
CNN's Bill Schneider "informed the GOP that the way to recover from midterm losses is to imitate Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and embrace liberal policies," the liberal-media hating News Busters concluded. My favorite response to the Whalen piece came from Weekly Standard reader Calcowgirl, who simply pointed to Schwarzenegger's deeds as proof he wasn't one of them. She (I assumed Calcowgirl is a female) keeps a list of the governor's offenses from 2006:
.........
-- Signed AB 1207, Code of Fair Campaign Practices (homosexual agenda)
Absentee ballots are part of the homosexual agenda? Anyway, the real question is: How many of these would President George W. Bush support?
(Excerpt) Read more at latimesblogs.latimes.com ...
How is highlighting your very own partner-in-crime on FR getting an L.A. Times mention a "cheap shot"?
"Oh yeah, I just wanted to add that I found Calcowgirl's posts during the campaign to be very useful "
If you found her posts "very useful", they must have led you to consider voting for someone other than Arnold.
Who was the other candidate you were considering, I could never get calcowgirl to tell me who she was trying to get us to vote for.
---
FRom the keyboard of the FO account.... does that need further amplification?
FR is a conservative joint, last I had heard. The continued haranguing of some here to try and label them as subversives is a real stretch, but that doesn't stop some from continuing that line of attack and that is all it is, imo.
Insults are cheap , and so are some Progressive posters here.. 'nuff said.
I like both FO and CCG
btt
Personally, I think you should have gotten some of the ilk credit. DICCs are not conservatives.
I'm glad you can admit you're not conservative
If you want someone to ignore you then shout in their face. DICCs and the California ilk herd are the ones wearing the sheep's clothing.
I can understand how you of the ilk herd think FO is a pain. Funny though, only ilk are offended.
Rino hunters are liars, too.
After reading your four juvenile posts above I now know that 68 stands for your IQ...
Or, encouraging other liberal netters to search for "calcowgirl", so they can join her in her DICC operations.
The faux conservatives in re CA "conservatives" have been outted. Hope they enjoy what's coming next.
Before the last election, he didn't campaign for a single republican or conservative anywhere. Loyalty is a two-way street, FairOpinion. Sometimes you just have to walk away.
Thats okay, I think you're just part of the herd.
To me, it seems like the blogger is using double faux (faux-conservtive/faux-herd bull) as a parody of conservatives. Just like Archie Bunker, and just like arch conservative Archie was destructively parodied by ultra-liberal Carroll O' Connor I suspect that the faux-bull, as well as all of the most embarrassing of the ilk, are being played as a parody. Their reason is the same as O'Connor's; to embarrass, to ridicule, to reject, to divide and to destroy conservatives.
DICCs are not conservatives.
--
Neither are you, grunt.
Progressive is the word that best matches your indifference to many issues that conservatives genuinely care about here at FR. All you deal in is insinuation and insult,, and not very well at that either.
If folks like you have your way, you'd keep all the lefties social programs in place and keep increasing spending to prop them up while the rest toil to support this socialist utopia.
This is the best you TWirPs have to offer? lolol..
And they refuse to acknowledge the damage that Bustamante would have caused if the anti-Arnold faction had succeeded in getting that leftist elected.
That's because some conservatives are intelligent and savvy enough to know that we are only going to drag our country back to the right slowly through incrementalism, the same way it was pushed left. And other conservatives such as the anti-Arnold faction are hell-bent on allowing the country to be destroyed through their "all-or-nothing" radical ideology that consistently gives us NOTHING and keeps the country going further left.
The same "all-or-nothing" faction types in PA sabotaged solidly conservative Santorum, too, which shows you how absolutely unappeasable they really are... or what utterly fake conservatives many of them are in truth.
If the ilk have their way there will be no future Republican victories and conservatives will be completely marginalized.
there will be no future Republican victories and conservatives will be completely marginalized.
--
your open support of Progressives and TWirPs has hardly had the opposite effect.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.