[Red_Devil 232]

A cut and runner with a hawkish stance? I don't understand how a cut and runner wants to win this war. I guess I am confused?

Also I do not understand this statement:

Politically and Strategically we CANNOT lose Iraq. So, we either fight or we leave.

If, as you state "...we CANNOT lose Iraq." then leaving is not an option!

It should read: Politically and Strategically we CANNOT lose Iraq. So we fight.

[MaineVoter2002]

A cut and runner with a hawkish stance? I don't understand how a cut and runner wants to win this war. I guess I am confused?

You're confused because it is a democrat technique being used by republicans. Those who support an unconditional victory in Iraq, those who feel we should allow our troops to do what they do best and that's fight to win, those who question whether the war should be fought by politicians as it was during Vietnam are being called "cut and run".

It is confusing because it's not honest

[MaineVoter2002]

It should read: Politically and Strategically we CANNOT lose Iraq. So we fight

I wanted to say that badly. I have 100% faith in our troops, but I dont have enough faith that the politicians in DC will understand it before it's too late.

We still have Syria and Iran to deal with. And North Korea. Syria and Iran surround Iraq... I say bring the war to those bringing it to us and Iraq.