Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Times turns to Supreme Court [leak investigation about a terrorism-funding probe......]
Yahoo ^

Posted on 11/24/2006 4:46:49 PM PST by Sub-Driver

New York Times turns to Supreme Court

2 hours, 47 minutes ago

The New York Times asked the Supreme Court on Friday to block the government from reviewing the phone records of two reporters in a leak investigation about a terrorism-funding probe.

The case involved stories written in 2001 by Times reporters Judith Miller and Philip Shenon that revealed the government's plans to freeze the assets of two Islamic charities, the Holy Land Foundation and the Global Relief Foundation.

In a 2-1 decision, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said federal prosecutors can see the phone records of Shenon and Miller. Miller retired from the Times a year ago.

The Times wants Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to block temporarily the government from going through the records so that the newspaper can prepare a petition arguing why the justices should step into the case. Ginsburg asked the Justice Department for a response.

A federal judge had ruled that the records were off limits unless prosecutors could show they had exhausted all other means of finding out who spoke to the newspaper.

The appeals court said a grand jury investigation of the disclosures wasn't likely to go anywhere without help from the reporters or access to their records.

In papers filed with the Supreme Court, the Times said when confidential sources confirmed that the assets of two charities would be frozen, Shenon and Miller called the two organizations for comment.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: globalrelief; grf; hlf; holyland; judithmiller; miller; philipshenon; shenon; terrorcharities
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
I pray they lose.
1 posted on 11/24/2006 4:46:52 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Why do you think they ran to darth-vader-ginsburg?


2 posted on 11/24/2006 4:48:20 PM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It doesn't matter. Liberal leakers of national security secrets are practically immune from serious consequenses.


3 posted on 11/24/2006 4:49:36 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I do also.

Once upon a time, I respected Judith Miller. In the years leading to 911, that is. I thought she placed common decency and love of country over her career. I was wrong.


4 posted on 11/24/2006 4:50:57 PM PST by Donna Lee Nardo (DEATH TO ISLAMIC TERRORISTS AND ANIMAL AND CHILD ABUSERS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
B-b-but I thought The NY Times was all about finding, exposing and even convicting leakers? At all costs! Didn't they editorialize quite fervently and frequently on this point just a year or two ago. Something about "Plame" as I recall. [snicker]
5 posted on 11/24/2006 4:57:25 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"wants Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to block temporarily the government from going through the records "

Gee....what a surprise they want a former ACLU Lawyer (Ginsberg) to handle the petition for an injunction....

6 posted on 11/24/2006 4:58:27 PM PST by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Bump.


7 posted on 11/24/2006 5:02:09 PM PST by RedRover (They are not killers. Defend our Marines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

It doesn't matter. Liberal leakers of national security secrets are practically immune from serious consequenses.

Yeah, just like Liberal campaign fundraising law violaters and Liberal secret ducument thieves.


8 posted on 11/24/2006 5:12:02 PM PST by freedomfiter2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
FWIW, rest of the story:
The government, which is conducting a leak investigation to try to find out the reporters' sources, says those phone calls tipped off the charities of planned government raids. A federal judge who ruled in the newspaper's favor said there is no evidence in the record suggesting the reporters even knew of the government's plans to raid either charity.

In a separate matter, Miller spent 85 days in jail for defying court orders that she testify in the investigation into who in the Bush administration leaked the identity of covert CIA officer Valerie Plame.


9 posted on 11/24/2006 5:28:58 PM PST by upchuck (Republicans didn`t lose this time around because they were conservative, but because they WEREN`T!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

We are in a battle against two forces that want to destroy America --- Islamofascists and the ACLU (along with all of their leftist pals in the media and Congress).


10 posted on 11/24/2006 5:32:08 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
The Times wants Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Out of curiosity, are they justice shopping, or is there some jurisdictional reason why Ginsburg would get this case?

If they want her to handle the case, some one will have to wake her up.

11 posted on 11/24/2006 5:36:06 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero; Howlin

Leak investigation info; not Scooter related, but I believe this is one of Fitzy's cases also. This leak happened shortly after 9/11 (I don't recall the exact date), but this makes several cases now against the NYTimes. I believe the Times is currently being held in contempt and being fined $NK a day because one of the reporters refuses to provide the information/sources that was mandated by the court....not this leak case, but the case that involves the anthrax investigation. NYTimes is truly the NYSlimes.


12 posted on 11/24/2006 6:12:27 PM PST by Laverne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

If Ginsburg does block the investigation, and if it has really gotten this far with it, then I would hope the Justice Department would appeal to the whole Court to vacate any restraining order Ginsburg comes up with.


13 posted on 11/24/2006 6:22:44 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

They better....


14 posted on 11/24/2006 6:25:02 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cicero; Congressman Billybob

I believe that each justice has a "territory".
Apparently, the scumbag NY Times is in Ginsburg's "territory".

Congressman Billybob would know.


15 posted on 11/24/2006 6:26:56 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

I was also wondering about territory. Jurisdiction could possibly involve either New York, where the Times is, or DC, where the activities mostly took place.


16 posted on 11/24/2006 6:54:12 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
"...We are in a battle against two forces that want to destroy America --- Islamofascists and the ACLU (along with all of their leftist pals in the media and Congress)..."

It's gonna be tough enough dealing with the Islamofacists , let alone having to fight the ACLU too!

Just kidding about the second link, but the maps start around post#11. Stay well and safe, Doug............FRegards

17 posted on 11/24/2006 8:04:06 PM PST by gonzo (I'm not confused anymore. Now I'm sure we have to completely destroy Islam, and FAST!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

Of *course* they went to Judge
Ruth Traitor Ginsburg.


18 posted on 11/24/2006 10:37:13 PM PST by NickatNite2003 (From the Man from Hope" to the wife who snarls "Abandon All Hope!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: potlatch; PhilDragoo; ntnychik; dixiechick2000; Grampa Dave; Interesting Times; Cicero






19 posted on 11/25/2006 12:27:27 AM PST by devolve ( .................always shop, invest, & hire wisely)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Donna Lee Nardo

Never EVER underestimate the depths democrats will gladly sink to in order to tear this country down! http://sacredscoop.com


20 posted on 11/25/2006 9:07:41 AM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson