To: LibWhacker
This would be totally unnecessary if we had safer bullets.
I'm Jocelyn Elders and I approved this message.
2 posted on
11/23/2006 12:12:16 PM PST by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
To: LibWhacker
Bulletproof underwear, that's the future.
3 posted on
11/23/2006 12:12:58 PM PST by
353FMG
(I never met a liberal I didn't dislike.)
To: LibWhacker
These type inventions concern me because of their potential to make the 2nd amendment obsolete. Just wait and see what happens when the politicaians think they can screw with the public with no consequences.
4 posted on
11/23/2006 12:15:19 PM PST by
Ajnin
(I)
To: b_sharp; neutrality; anguish; SeaLion; Fractal Trader; grjr21; bitt; KevinDavis; Momaw Nadon; ...
FutureTechPing! |
An emergent technologies list covering biomedical research, fusion power, nanotech, AI robotics, and other related fields. FReepmail to join or drop. |
|
|
|
5 posted on
11/23/2006 12:15:46 PM PST by
AntiGuv
("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
To: LibWhacker
To: LibWhacker
So if I understand this correctly, the bullet would push the fabric into the body causing all kinds of damage, but the fabric won't break?
What am I getting wrong here?
7 posted on
11/23/2006 12:26:00 PM PST by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Welcome Home, son! You and your comrades are our heroes!))
To: LibWhacker
Well, the next logical step would be exotic bullets [say, with no spin - aerodynamic stabilization with fins and long boattail, but with a small shaped charge. Impact velocity will be 8000m/sec or better]. Similar game was played by Krupp ages ago. Better armor plate - and then better artillery shell, and then still better armor plate, and again, still better shell... The Kaiser saw it right through, but had to pay from both ends anyway.
13 posted on
11/23/2006 12:48:08 PM PST by
GSlob
To: LibWhacker
Where does the line form to get this technology? I think the Chinese would be interested. So would the Iranians, North Koreans, Cubans, Venezuelans, ...
23 posted on
11/23/2006 2:13:21 PM PST by
C210N
(Bush SPIED, Terrorists DIED!)
To: LibWhacker
Bulletproof at what thickness? I mean, would the thickness and drape and feel of the fabric be the same? I'm somehow reminded of Monty Python "fake news" reporting about a man who crossed the Atlantic in a life raft...a specially modified life raft with a 38 foot fiberglass hull, three luxury cabins, twin diesel engines, a hot tub, etc....
At some point, what they call a t-shirt just isn't a mere t-shirt anymore.
26 posted on
11/23/2006 2:22:18 PM PST by
Petronski
(BRABANTIO: Thou art a villain. IAGO: You are--a senator. ---Othello I.i.)
To: LibWhacker
So why not just make bullets out of carbon nanotubes?
To: LibWhacker
I see a great marketing oppurtunity here for bullet-proof pajamas. Just the thing for the WOD, no-knock raids that seem to be so popular.
30 posted on
11/23/2006 2:50:20 PM PST by
dljordan
To: Dark Wing
33 posted on
11/23/2006 3:10:31 PM PST by
Thud
To: LibWhacker
While it may be possible to eventually construct fabric from threads so strong that they will not be broken by the impact from a bullet, there still remains the problem of how to dissipate the bullet's energy.
As illustrated in the article, if the fabric stopped the bullet, what would happen if this was a 'bulletproof' tee shirt, is that the bullet would proceed onward through the skin of the target subject, dragging the tee shirt with it into the wound.
For any fabric to prevent wounding by a bullet, it must have an energy-absorbing backing, which means a support or padding that can dissipate the bullet's kinetic energy over a large enough area of the human body so it will not suffer more than a bruise.
To: LibWhacker
Sounds cool, but I don't want to be the first to test it.
39 posted on
11/23/2006 6:37:44 PM PST by
Nachoman
(Just because you're a kook doesn't mean there isn't a conspiracy.)
To: LibWhacker
A piece of diamond .. was used as a bullet...
Someone's always trying to 'one up' the Lone Ranger.
42 posted on
11/24/2006 6:05:22 AM PST by
Condor51
(Tagline Under Construction - Kindly Wear Your Hardhat)
To: LibWhacker
Very interesting...proper nanotube weaves combined with shear thickening fluids will be a big step forward in lightweight ballistic body armour...
Of course that will then encourage military establishments to develop man-portable railguns...
Alas as long as for whatever reason some people want to kill other people, and those other people dont want to be killed by them, the arms/armour race will never end...
45 posted on
11/28/2006 3:17:05 AM PST by
FYREDEUS
(FYREDEUS)
To: LibWhacker
The age of metals ends and the age of the synthetic arrives
47 posted on
11/28/2006 7:47:56 AM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: LibWhacker
So, let me get this straight. The bullet wont penetrate the t-shirt fabric? That's great. So we just have to worry about the t-shirt fabric penetrating the wearer's body in the shape of a bullet. Beautiful.
48 posted on
11/28/2006 7:58:09 AM PST by
semaj
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson