Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

So if I understand this correctly, the bullet would push the fabric into the body causing all kinds of damage, but the fabric won't break?

What am I getting wrong here?


7 posted on 11/23/2006 12:26:00 PM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Welcome Home, son! You and your comrades are our heroes!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bnelson44

Could be wrong, but I'm assuming the nanotubes spread out the energy of the impact over the whole shirt.


8 posted on 11/23/2006 12:32:00 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

My guess is that a really bad bruise is usually going to be better than a perforation and a large exit wound.


9 posted on 11/23/2006 12:33:13 PM PST by NearlyNormal (Our military wins wars, the liberals and their MSM lose them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
So if I understand this correctly, the bullet would push the fabric into the body causing all kinds of damage, but the fabric won't break?

Precisely ... the fabric may not allow the projectile to penetrate ... but the material is so thin it will allow the projectile to push the fabric well into the body tissue.

14 posted on 11/23/2006 12:53:23 PM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
Forgive the source, I had to get this from Wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silk

Mongols used silk as part of the under-armor garments. Silk is so tough that it was actually used as very light armor, although its special use (the big secret) was to stop arrow penetration into the body. The silk would stop an arrow from penetrating far enough into the body to be lethal; and the arrow could then be pulled out of the wound by tugging on the unbroken silk. The added advantage to this is that there would be no contact between the arrowhead and the interior of the body; thus it reduces the incidence of infected wounds.

There would be perforation with this nanotube armor, but a great deal less trauma than a through and through wound channel.
18 posted on 11/23/2006 1:14:41 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
the bullet would push the fabric into the body causing all kinds of damage, but the fabric won't break?

hmmm..Seems so, Massive internal injuries (broken bones/ruptured organs....dead person)
...bright side..no holes / tears in the Tee-shirt.

31 posted on 11/23/2006 2:59:57 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just b/c your paranoid; Doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

Other materials such as fluids with extremely high shear forces would probably be added so that the result would be like wearing a thin, flexible suit of armor that would harden in an instant and dissipate the mechanical force of impact into chemical and thermal energy. The concept is contrary to common sense and it took me several readings and some thought before I understood it.


38 posted on 11/23/2006 6:31:31 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson