Skip to comments.
Judge: No Federal Class in Vioxx Cases
AP ^
| 11/22/6
Posted on 11/22/2006 10:18:48 AM PST by SmithL
New Orleans -- Thousands of federal lawsuits claiming the drug Vioxx caused heart attacks and other conditions that killed or injured people cannot be pooled into one national class action, a judge ruled Wednesday.
U.S. District Court Judge Eldon Fallon, who was appointed to deal with pretrial matters for all federal suits involving Merck & Co.'s withdrawn painkiller, did not rule on the possibility of separate class-actions suits for each state and the District of Columbia.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: attacklawyers; vioxx
1
posted on
11/22/2006 10:18:50 AM PST
by
SmithL
Fallon, Eldon E.
- Born 1939 in New Orleans, LA
Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana
Nominated by William J. Clinton on February 3, 1995, to a seat vacated by Adrian Guy Duplantier; Confirmed by the Senate on May 8, 1995, and received commission on May 10, 1995.
Education:
Tulane University, B.A., 1959
Louisiana State University Law School, J.D., 1962
Yale Law School, LL.M., 1963
Professional Career:
Private practice, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1962-1995
Adjunct professor, Tulane Law School, 1975-1993
Race or Ethnicity: White
Gender: Male
2
posted on
11/22/2006 10:19:44 AM PST
by
SmithL
(Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
To: SmithL
Judge: No Federal Class in Vioxx Cases Thank goodness. I almost had a coronary.
3
posted on
11/22/2006 10:22:08 AM PST
by
jdm
To: SmithL
Amazing. A Clinton/Carter judge who is not corrupt! How did he slip through the democrat party vetting?
To: SmithL
I bet the lawyers are upset, then again, maybe not, they'll still get theirs anway.
5
posted on
11/22/2006 10:23:28 AM PST
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/optimism_nov8th.htm)
To: traviskicks
John Edwards is deeply disturbed.
6
posted on
11/22/2006 10:27:10 AM PST
by
SmithL
(Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
To: traviskicks
I bet the lawyers are upset, then again, maybe not, they'll still get theirs anway. Probably not. Instead of one big class action case, there will be 50 smaller ones. Oh there will be plenty of money for the bottom feeders.
To: Always Right
now the lawyers will have to find 1000's of jury's that will give them big rewards...and will have to work each one...it will take time and money...as it should...trial lawyers suck...lower than whale dung
To: Youngman442002
So are we all assuming that Merck is not liable?
9
posted on
11/22/2006 10:43:38 AM PST
by
Wormwood
(deeply religious non-believer)
To: Wormwood
verdicts are running about 50-50 so far with the trend to the defense.
10
posted on
11/22/2006 9:11:32 PM PST
by
gusopol3
To: SmithL
The "silk pony" cannot be too happy about this...
11
posted on
11/22/2006 9:31:26 PM PST
by
Trajan88
(www.bullittclub.com)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson