UPDATE:
Thanks to ButThreeLeftsDo for the ping to this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1882805/posts
#
http://washingtontimes.com/article/20070816/NATION/108160068/1002
“In imams’ suit, status of ‘John Does’ in dispute”
By Audrey Hudson
August 16, 2007
ARTICLE SNIPPET: “A legal squabble in a lawsuit brought by Muslim imam passengers is escalating among lawyers over the question of who is being sued over their removal from a flight last year.
“John Doe” passengers are named as parties in the litigation for reporting suspicious behavior of the six men, which led to their removal from the flight. Employees of U.S. Airways and a Minneapolis airport are also targets of the lawsuit now proceeding through a federal court.
One of the attorneys representing the six Muslim men says they do not intend to pursue the passengers in litigation, but the Becket Fund, which is aiding the defendants in the case, says “John Doe” passengers remain listed as a party to the lawsuit and are still targets of the litigation.”
UDPATE:
Thanks to ButThreeLeftsDo for the ping to this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1884540/posts
“Imams Looking For Case To Go Forward In Court (”Flyin’ Imams”!!)”
KSTP.com ^ | 8/21/07 | KSTP.com
Posted on 08/21/2007 5:03:59 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo