[George W. Bush]

And Republicans are going to elect someone who is going to slay the Hildebeast.

If that is all we have to offer, we will lose.

F.O.H. (Fear Of Hillary) is not the Republican agenda for '08. If it is, we've already lost.

Personally, I'm far more afraid of Giuliani than Hitlery.

[ShawTaylor]

If that is all we have to offer, we will lose

If what we have to offer is someone who will beat Hilary Clinton, then it means we shall lose?
Your statement make any sense to you?.
Don't make no sense to me.

[ShawTaylor]

Personally, I'm far more afraid of Giuliani than Hitlery

Therein lies your problem.

[JCEccles]

Personally, I'm far more afraid of Giuliani than Hitlery.

I think I understand what you're saying here.

In some ways, a social liberal Republican president is in a more lethal position to undermine and destroy social conservative values than a social liberal Democrat president is.

Enemies outside the gate we can at least see and set up defenses against. Lord deliver us from the master within our own household who holds the same views as our enemies.

[Blackirish]

Personally, I'm far more afraid of Giuliani than Hitlery

---

I see that as an example of how some folks when they are the extreme far right or left of the spectrum start to mirror each other. I've seen other posters who start to mirror Al Kaida ...saying they'd rather lose a major American city then have Rudy who believes abortion should be legal who would be tougher then some pro-lifers on national security. The fact that Rudy has a very good shot at winning has pushed some folks on the far social right over the edge.