Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AliVeritas

I don't believe in the 'repeating history' thing. History never repeats itself. It might run in a fashion that is similar to something in the past but there will always be new factors involved that make each situation totally unique. This situation is no different. You can point back at Vietnam and see similarities but it is folly to assume the same solutions to Vietnam would apply in this situation.

We can use history as a rough guideline but only if we keep in mind that our own situation is new and unique and might require a different solution than any history has to offer us.

That the media are reporting in a negative manner is totally mundane and predictable. Nothing new or amazing there. The Pentagon used this to their advantage in the build up to and during the initial invasion in 2003. That things wouldn't go according to plan was also an elementary assumption (things never go according to plan).

If President Bush had hoped to have Iraq and Afghanistan all 'tidied up' by the elections, this was a faulty assumption. I have yet to understand why he sacked Rumsfeld in the manner he did. You don't stand by a guy 100% and then turn around and fire him. If he really believed in Rumsfeld he should have stuck with him- come what may.

What the administration needs to focus on now is committing us to a policy in the Middle East that will be impossible for any subsequent president or congress to withdraw from. Personally, I think that was already accomplished when we invaded Iraq. To withdraw now would be the ultimate humiliation for America and I don't even think the democrats are that stupid (although I know some Freepers will comment on that one).

If we withdraw, we'll be right back over there again in no time at all. This is obvious. Must be obvious to even the most embittered liberal.


26 posted on 11/19/2006 2:03:40 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Prodigal Son

It's possible that Rumsfeld simply attempted to resign yet again, and this time could not be convinced to stick around.


29 posted on 11/19/2006 2:31:50 AM PST by A Balrog of Morgoth (With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Prodigal Son
You've been reading the NYSlimes too often and paying too many visits to DU.

1. Rummy did NOT get fired.....he resigned. PERIOD.

2. President Bush did NOT expect the war to be 'all tidied up' by election day. He said from the start it would take years and he's repeated that many many times. Try listening to him instead of just repeating RAT propaganda.
33 posted on 11/19/2006 3:33:34 AM PST by AmeriBrit (Soros and Clinton's for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington = SCREW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Prodigal Son
You know I can agree with some of your point, but disagree with your first, "History never repeats itself". If you look back to Vietnam you find our troops fighting a war in a "politically correct" manner. Our foes had safe haven in Laos, Cambodia and we restrained our attacks on North Vietnam, All due to political considerations

Fast forward to 2006 Iran, Syria and Pakistan are "politically protected" areas. This is repeating the mistakes of the past and our chances of success are as good as they were in 1970.

You have got to make them understand that they are not safe anywhere.
37 posted on 11/19/2006 4:35:59 AM PST by Recon Dad (Marine Spec Ops Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson