Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Introduced to Allow [Gun] Carry in National Parks
Ohioans For Concealed Carry ^ | 11/17/06 | Mike Kinsey

Posted on 11/18/2006 9:44:58 AM PST by kiriath_jearim

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 11/18/2006 9:44:59 AM PST by kiriath_jearim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

I bet this will be a priority with the 110th congress, hmmm are we still glad about staying home to teach Bush and the gop a lesson


2 posted on 11/18/2006 9:48:05 AM PST by italianquaker (Democrats its time to fish or cut bait, no more blaming Prez Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

One great big BTTT on this one!!!!


3 posted on 11/18/2006 9:49:07 AM PST by ancient_geezer (Don't reform it, Replace it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
I guess they'll have to forgive me for noting this was attempted during the last six weeks and not the first six weeks of leadersip. The right of states to override is proper, but it essentially makes the legislation meaningless.
4 posted on 11/18/2006 9:51:12 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker; Everybody
I bet this will be a priority with the 110th congress, hmmm are we still glad about staying home to teach Bush and the gop a lesson.

This type of bill seems familiar.. Two bits similar bills have been presented, ~and ignored~, by gop dominated congresses.

5 posted on 11/18/2006 9:55:36 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
The right of states to override is proper,

I don't 'get' your reasoning..

Why should States have a right to override our inalienable right to carry arms?

6 posted on 11/18/2006 10:00:42 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tpaine

Thats answers that then, if it couldnt pass before you can throw dirt on it now. In my state of florida they passed a law where you can carry in state parks but thats florida


7 posted on 11/18/2006 10:10:39 AM PST by italianquaker (Democrats its time to fish or cut bait, no more blaming Prez Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Not getting into the history of the US Constitution being water downed.

He means, if a state has reciprocity[or not] with another state allowing them to carry a Concealed wpn that trumps the Fed Law of allowing you to carry a gun into a National Forest in another State.
8 posted on 11/18/2006 10:10:57 AM PST by FLOutdoorsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Too late. Had six years and blew it.


9 posted on 11/18/2006 10:14:09 AM PST by SampleMan (Do not dispute the peacefulness of Islam, so as not to send Muslims into violent outrage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLOutdoorsman; cardinal4

I remember taking a coach tour of our western National Parks a few years ago, and I was astonished to see signs all over the place probibiting bringing firearms in Yellowstone National Park. Right next to those signs were other signs warning of the presence of grizzlies in the area. Didn't compute then, doesn't compute now.


10 posted on 11/18/2006 10:15:53 AM PST by Ax (Cheer, cheer, for Old Notre Dame. And the Wolverines today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
Yeah, why didn't Allen introduce this bill months ago?
11 posted on 11/18/2006 10:17:30 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Why can't Republicans stand up to Democrats like they do to terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ax
I remember taking a coach tour of our western National Parks a few years ago, and I was astonished to see signs all over the place probibiting bringing firearms in Yellowstone National Park.

Obviously unconstitutional prohibitions.
Some main highways run through Yellowstone. I'd bet that hundreds [if not thousands] of travelers a day rightly ignore those 'laws'.

12 posted on 11/18/2006 10:24:05 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tpaine

On this one you were quite right to point out the error of my logic. While I do support state's rights in general, individual rights supercede those rights on this issue. It's embarassing to have to have someone correct me on my take, but I'd rather have someone do it and address the error than let it hang. Good call. Sorry about that.


13 posted on 11/18/2006 10:29:32 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FLOutdoorsman
DoughtyOne:
"-- The right of states to override is proper, --"


I don't 'get' your reasoning..
Why should States have a right to override our inalienable right to carry arms?

FLO:
He means, if a state has reciprocity[or not] with another state allowing them to carry a Concealed wpn that trumps the Fed Law of allowing you to carry a gun into a National Forest in another State.

Neither States nor Feds have a power to write laws "allowing" you to carry. -- Our right to bear "shall not be infringed".

14 posted on 11/18/2006 10:34:53 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FLOutdoorsman

Actually, tpaine was right to call me on that. Individual rights trump states rights on this issue. I was focused on federal vs states rights when it was a no-brainer that Seccond Ammendment guaranteed rights were at stake.


15 posted on 11/18/2006 10:34:53 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Well put.. Thanks.


16 posted on 11/18/2006 10:36:28 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tpaine

I agree.


17 posted on 11/18/2006 10:36:31 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tpaine

And thanks for raising the point.


18 posted on 11/18/2006 10:38:52 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I was reasoning that we've just forgotten how much the Constitution is not followed. And we blindly follow whatever they say is legal.


19 posted on 11/18/2006 10:41:31 AM PST by FLOutdoorsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FLOutdoorsman

While I agree that the general populace has sunk to this level, I do have to be frank when addressing a comment I made that was was so wrong.

Later...


20 posted on 11/18/2006 10:47:16 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson