[Rummenigge]

It's not impossible. Just present objective scientific evidence and I'll be willing to accept such.


Good. Certainly I'm not the lawyer of climate science guys.

I guess they got a hard time modelling climate but at least they find new ways of modelling complex systems and if they achieve to improve the weather forecast that would be saving millions in agricultural and military matters.

But before evidence there comes indicators. A law suit against CO2 would set the suspect freeb- no doubt.

Question is - given the risks at stake don't we need a quantanamo for CH4 and CO2. Because they sure look guilty.

[dhuffman@awod.com]

Does no one else remember the 'precautionary principle'? Apply it when you will then you must apply it when you won't.

Greenies are watermelons, sick green on the outside and fellow traveler pink on the inside.

[AmericaUnited]

Renowned Scientist Defects From Belief in Global Warming – Caps Year of Vindication for Skeptics

---

October 17, 2006
Washington DC - One of the most decorated French geophysicists has converted from a believer in manmade catastrophic global warming to a climate skeptic. This latest defector from the global warming camp caps a year in which numerous scientific studies have bolstered the claims of climate skeptics. Scientific studies that debunk the dire predictions of human-caused global warming have continued to accumulate and many believe the new science is shattering the media-promoted scientific “consensus” on climate alarmism.

...
http://epw.senate.gov/pressitem.cfm?party=rep&id=264777

[Stentor]

But before evidence there comes indicators.

Do you mean omens? Are you a seer?