Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: kiriath_jearim
Presumably, if one of my girlfriends gives birth in New Jersey, I can have my name and all twelve of my other girlfriends' names listed as legal parents on the birth certificate, provided everyone listed is an adult and consents to it. I hope this would be the case, since I wouldn't want to be discriminated against.
36 posted on
11/16/2006 5:03:16 PM PST by
spinestein
(DOING THE JOB THE OLD MEDIA USED TO DO)
To: kiriath_jearim
Notice how the baby in this article, "newborn" is treated as an "it." The sex of the baby was not mentioned. That likley means the child is a boy, who will grow up feminized and whussy pipped.
Alas Babylon!!!!!!!!!!!
The liberal socialist moonbats want to prevent our nation from the testeronic vaguries which result in men who can defend our freedom.
So much for NJ. It has gone.
38 posted on
11/16/2006 5:07:41 PM PST by
Candor7
(Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
To: kiriath_jearim
This child is being deprived of the truth and may wind up being resentful because of that.
To: kiriath_jearim
Why isn't the father suing for shared custody? Was this a sperm bank kid? Should I actually read the article?
40 posted on
11/16/2006 5:08:23 PM PST by
69ConvertibleFirebird
(Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
To: kiriath_jearim
This couple was treated exactly the same way as a married couple under the law of New Jersey, said Stephen Hyland, the lawyer for the women. So no matter what New Jersey chooses to do legislatively, the couples have the same rights. And of course, it's all about the "rights" of perverted adults. The rights of this child to enjoy a natural parentage do not exist. She was created purely to satisfy their vanity and advance their political agenda. Pukes.
41 posted on
11/16/2006 5:08:57 PM PST by
workerbee
(Democrats are a waste of tax money and good oxygen.)
To: kiriath_jearim
I do not think that it is biologically possible for the child to have two "mothers". Since the child has a "father" (the sperm donor), the "mothers" are committing fraud by not listing the father.
43 posted on
11/16/2006 5:15:30 PM PST by
reg45
To: kiriath_jearim
The
court gave the Legislature 180 days either to bring gay couples within the states marriage laws or establish a parallel system of civil unions.
Nah! There is no such thing as legislation from the bench! /SARC
46 posted on
11/16/2006 5:18:54 PM PST by
Don Corleone
(Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
To: kiriath_jearim
Either that child has a natural father or the mother's name is Mary and Jesus has returned. I strongly doubt the second possibility.
47 posted on
11/16/2006 5:21:08 PM PST by
reg45
To: kiriath_jearim
Hypothetical situation:
- A woman get's pregnant by one man.
- She then marries another man.
- The child is then born.
Question: Who's name appears on the birth certificate? The husband's or the biological father's?
To: kiriath_jearim
One baby = one egg + one sperm. That makes them liars on the birth certificate.
53 posted on
11/16/2006 5:50:41 PM PST by
tioga
To: kiriath_jearim
So this child has no right to a father.
There should be laws to stop this. A child is entitled to a mother and a father.
Not a "parent and sex fetish partner."
55 posted on
11/16/2006 5:54:22 PM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: kiriath_jearim
there is an easy way to fix this.
No man can be a sperm donor without a child support obligation.
No man is allowed to make annonymous donations which the child can never find out.
56 posted on
11/16/2006 6:02:47 PM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: kiriath_jearim
A lesbian couple in South Jersey won court approval this week to have both of their names listed as parents on the birth certificate of their newborn, Now we have to pretend not to know how children are conceived.....
This is warped.
58 posted on
11/16/2006 6:08:07 PM PST by
Jorge
To: kiriath_jearim
59 posted on
11/16/2006 6:12:16 PM PST by
Doogle
(USAF 68-73...."never store a threat you should have eliminated")
To: kiriath_jearim
All you fathers, join me in getting up and kissing your children good night.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson