Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NJ: Child Born to Lesbian Couple Will Have 2 Mothers Listed
NY Times ^ | 11/16/06 | LAURA MANSNERUS

Posted on 11/16/2006 4:15:11 PM PST by kiriath_jearim

TRENTON, Nov. 15 — A lesbian couple in South Jersey won court approval this week to have both of their names listed as parents on the birth certificate of their newborn, and the attorney general’s office said it will no longer oppose such applications.

The decision, in Family Court in Burlington County, stems from an Oct. 25 ruling by the New Jersey Supreme Court holding that same-sex couples are entitled to the same legal rights and protections as heterosexual couples. The court gave the Legislature 180 days either to bring gay couples within the state’s marriage laws or establish a parallel system of civil unions.

“This couple was treated exactly the same way as a married couple under the law of New Jersey,” said Stephen Hyland, the lawyer for the women. “So no matter what New Jersey chooses to do legislatively, the couples have the same rights.”

As the Legislature debates in the next six months, “you’ll see these life-and-death issues,” said Suzanne B. Goldberg, a Columbia University law professor. “Birth and death will not stop while the Legislature is working. State agencies and courts will find themselves wrestling with the issues.”

The baby was born on Tuesday one day after an agreement on the names was reached in a closed Family Court proceeding.

The Burlington County couple, who asked not to be identified, their lawyer said, because they did not want to draw attention to themselves, now do not have to go through an adoption proceeding to establish full parental rights for both. These rights include inheritance, custody and visitation.

In a previous case, in May 2005, the Superior Court in Essex County ruled that a lesbian couple was entitled to have the names of both women listed on their baby’s birth certificate.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: activistcourts; childabuse; junkscience; pseudoscience
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: kiriath_jearim
“This couple was treated exactly the same way as a married couple under the law of New Jersey,” said Stephen Hyland, the lawyer for the women. “So no matter what New Jersey chooses to do legislatively, the couples have the same rights.”

And of course, it's all about the "rights" of perverted adults. The rights of this child to enjoy a natural parentage do not exist. She was created purely to satisfy their vanity and advance their political agenda. Pukes.

41 posted on 11/16/2006 5:08:57 PM PST by workerbee (Democrats are a waste of tax money and good oxygen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

I know a pair. real butch both of them... One works at my job.

they adopted from the 3rd world.

they took an unwanted child away from poverty and depravity, but at what cost.

as an individual act of charity they may have saved the child's life...and if the child can get over the stigma...she may have a good life.

But with the combined effort of untold thousands of these abominations....it is helping the left in the destruction of civilized society.


42 posted on 11/16/2006 5:09:13 PM PST by Vaquero ("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
I do not think that it is biologically possible for the child to have two "mothers". Since the child has a "father" (the sperm donor), the "mothers" are committing fraud by not listing the father.
43 posted on 11/16/2006 5:15:30 PM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beagle9

The natural law will order us dead. Simple.


44 posted on 11/16/2006 5:16:53 PM PST by Soothesayer (Birth is murder!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
No! That's the father's name.

Does that make the child a baster bastard???

45 posted on 11/16/2006 5:17:26 PM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
The court gave the Legislature 180 days either to bring gay couples within the state’s marriage laws or establish a parallel system of civil unions.

Nah! There is no such thing as legislation from the bench! /SARC

46 posted on 11/16/2006 5:18:54 PM PST by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Either that child has a natural father or the mother's name is Mary and Jesus has returned. I strongly doubt the second possibility.


47 posted on 11/16/2006 5:21:08 PM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
they took an unwanted child away from poverty and depravity

. . . and brought her into financial comfort and depravity.

O.K. - I guess there's worse trade-offs.

I know a gay couple who own and work in a beauty salon. They adopted twin girls from an abusive, dysfunctional home who have multiple learning and behavioral disorders. I think they are doing O.K. The girls always have the BEST hair-do's!!! (I kid you not, those guys do them up every morning before school. They look like a million bucks.)

48 posted on 11/16/2006 5:24:01 PM PST by PLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: PLK

Get away from me.


49 posted on 11/16/2006 5:33:58 PM PST by Greystoke (The future doesn’t belong to the faint-hearted; it belongs to the brave - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
Hypothetical situation:
  1. A woman get's pregnant by one man.
  2. She then marries another man.
  3. The child is then born.
Question: Who's name appears on the birth certificate? The husband's or the biological father's?
50 posted on 11/16/2006 5:40:55 PM PST by opinionator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spikeytx86
I have enough trouble with one nagging mother but to the second power? God Bless this child.

I feel sorrier for the kid's future spouse. Imagine two mothers-in-law!

51 posted on 11/16/2006 5:45:53 PM PST by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

I'd rather live in a poor home with loving, Christian parents, than be stuck with two wealthy, gay women fighting against nature to prop up some ill-conceived notion of family.


52 posted on 11/16/2006 5:47:33 PM PST by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

One baby = one egg + one sperm. That makes them liars on the birth certificate.


53 posted on 11/16/2006 5:50:41 PM PST by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greystoke

LOL


54 posted on 11/16/2006 5:51:42 PM PST by PLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

So this child has no right to a father.

There should be laws to stop this. A child is entitled to a mother and a father.

Not a "parent and sex fetish partner."


55 posted on 11/16/2006 5:54:22 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

there is an easy way to fix this.

No man can be a sperm donor without a child support obligation.

No man is allowed to make annonymous donations which the child can never find out.


56 posted on 11/16/2006 6:02:47 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spinestein
Presumably, if one of my girlfriends gives birth in New Jersey, I can have my name and all twelve of my other girlfriends' names listed as legal parents on the birth certificate

Either that or your girlfriend would have to list all twelve of her boyfriends.

57 posted on 11/16/2006 6:03:49 PM PST by opinionator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
A lesbian couple in South Jersey won court approval this week to have both of their names listed as parents on the birth certificate of their newborn,

Now we have to pretend not to know how children are conceived.....
This is warped.

58 posted on 11/16/2006 6:08:07 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
..coming from Joisey, it's OK as long as one of em sounds like this.......

http://www.the-earchives.com/scripts/download.asp?id=4666


Doogle
59 posted on 11/16/2006 6:12:16 PM PST by Doogle (USAF 68-73...."never store a threat you should have eliminated")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opinionator

Fair is fair!


60 posted on 11/16/2006 6:43:08 PM PST by spinestein (DOING THE JOB THE OLD MEDIA USED TO DO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson