Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HOTTIEBOY

It would have been best if brain dead Murtha had won. He is less capable of doing damage to the country, and would have crippled the Democrats plans for destroying the economy.

With Hoyer in charge, Democrats plans for destroying the economy will be in a better postion for success. Hoyer will be a better leader at destroying the presidents tools for fighting AlQaida.

So yes, Murtha was the better candidate for our country.
Hoyers odds for success are much better, and will put us in more danger.


256 posted on 11/16/2006 10:54:39 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: All

First objective of Pelosi will be to destroy the economy.

Dems did this back in 1990, and with help from the MSM put the blame on Bush Senior. You can bet your butt they are planning to kick in a recession to get a Dem in the white house. All economy chips fall in the presidents basket, like it or not.

Dems do not give a damm that Americans will suffer, as thats what they are there for, to ease the suffering by handing out cash. Someone elses hard earned cash.

Any failure of the house leadership run by Pelosi is a WIN for the United States, IPSO FACTO.


259 posted on 11/16/2006 11:14:54 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

To: PA-RIVER

You are right. Half of what Murtha says is silly or wrong - like his Okinawa comment... He's either not too bright, or needs to retire.


273 posted on 11/16/2006 12:23:29 PM PST by PghBaldy (Reporter: Are you surprised? Nancy Pelosi: No. My eyes always look like this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson