Posted on 11/15/2006 8:00:40 PM PST by djf
One of Art Bell's legitimate guests once said that while SETI was a worthwhile endeavor, they're looking in the
wrong places, that is, crowded systems where cosmic collisions are more likely to occur, and therefore,
wipe out any developed life back to the stone age.
Or at least the to the plow as the most important tool.
Good, Gaea! How open minded of them.
At least they have advanced since the days when they flatly refused to believe that rocks really could fall out of the sky.
Some of them still seem quite happy in their arrogance, however...Astronomers monitor every small space object with an orbit close to the Earth. We know whats out there, when they return, how close they come, Dr. Morrison said.
I do believe the man means, "Astronomers monitor every KNOWN small space object...".
Impulse power? I always thought of Teddy the Hutt as an alcohol fueled system. Or in the words of "Scotty" Clinton: I've givin' 'hr all she can take, cap'n. She's gonna blow!
No, wait, let me rephrase that.
"Well, don't have to spend a lot of time worrying about global warming"
Exactly! "global warming" is political science. Natural events such as Mount St. Helens' eruption have more impact than our styrofoam cups. If the earth's orbit around the sun were to vary just slightly (relative to 93 million miles distance to the sun) we would all be frozen or all be toast. "global warming" is nothing but speculation designed to support a political agenda.
I'm not sure either!! Does what you say mean that if I have a steel rod, say 5 miles long, and I smack the end of it with a sledge, that the far end doesn't move any faster than the sound wave would get there?
Either way, remember the vectors. The force it would take to displace the water and move it horizontally is almost perpendicular to the force of the object hitting the surface of the water (assuming it came down from directly overhead).
One hell of a mess. Not the kind of experiment I would advocate trying.
"How large of an asteroid is needed to make an 18 mile diameter crater (under 12,500 feet of water)? Anyone know?"
It was not UNDER 12,500 feet of water (the area it hit) BEFORE the asteriod hit.
If the object can make a crater 18 miles across, the depth of water cover would not be a major factor.
Ping
Catastrophism ping list | ||
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
It would depend on a few things. Like angle of impact, speed of the object, composition of the asteroid etc.
Comet/Asteroid Impacts
and Human Society
ed by Peter T. Bobrowsky
and Hans Rickman
intro (PDF)
due to links here
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Gods |
Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution. |
||||||||||||||||||||
· Discover · Bronze Age Forum · Science Daily · Science News · Eurekalert · PhysOrg · · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · Archaeology · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · · History topic · history keyword · archaeology keyword · paleontology keyword · · Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword · · |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.