a bit closer so I can get a better shot at it!"
Posted on 11/15/2006 12:12:55 PM PST by Liz
Exultant Chuck Says He’ll Veto the Next Alito; New King of Washington Promises Moderate Court; Rove-like, Plans Permanent Democratic Majority; More N.Y. Homeland Money, Iraqi Federalism
More than the inability to influence Iraq policy or the President’s tax cuts, Chuck Schumer says that the single greatest failure of the Democrats as an opposition party was allowing Samuel Alito to join the Supreme Court.
“Judges are the most important,” said Mr. Schumer, who orchestrated the implausible Democratic takeover of the Senate last week. “One more justice would have made it a 5-4 conservative, hard-right majority for a long time. That won’t happen.”
From now on, all the President’s judicial appointments will need to meet the requirements of Mr. Schumer, the Park Slope power broker who has happily accepted the mantle of chief architect for the Democrats’ effort to build a majority for the 2008 elections and beyond.
The Senator also intends, in the coming months, to rework the federal government’s funding priorities in New York’s favor, to steer the Democrats toward a radically new position on Iraq and, while he’s at it, to cement his position as the unofficially declared tactical guru for the national party.
And in case anyone’s wondering, yes, Mr. Schumer is entirely comfortable with this sort of power.
With his Gold Toe–stockinged feet dangling, the 55-year-old slumped in his armchair on Friday morning as if it were a leather throne. On his apartment’s front door, a neighbor taped up a front page of The New York Times heralding the Democrats’ success and scrawled “Congratulations Schumers!” across the cover.
The candidates that Mr. Schumer recruited, groomed and bankrolled had won a comprehensive victory over the incumbent Republicans, giving the Democrats a narrow majority in the Senate to complement a rout in the House. Since the election, Mr. Schumer has been awash in attention from the media, his Democratic colleagues and even from the President, who called, quite sportingly, soon after the results were finalized.
For Mr. Schumer, who was installed on Tuesday as Vice Chairman of the Democratic caucus and officially reinstated as head of the DSCC, the attention couldn’t be coming at a better time.
“I am writing a book, about how to build a permanent—a long-term majority,” Mr. Schumer said during an early-morning interview in the pink den of his apartment near Grand Army Plaza. He sat between a view of lower Manhattan and portraits of Democratic icons Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Al Smith. “I generally have an eye toward longer-term strategy and politics, and I think my colleagues rely on me for that.”
His book, Positively American: Winning Back the Middle Class Majority One Family at a Time, will be released right around the President’s State of the Union address, and will fit neatly into the role that Mr. Schumer now envisions for himself as tactician in chief for the newly ascendant Democrats.
“I’ve always had some influence, and I guess now, because of what we’ve been able to accomplish, I have some more influence,” Mr. Schumer said. “So when I say we shouldn’t do this or we should do that, I guess people will pay a little more attention. Or go along with it, even if they don’t agree.”
Certainly, the party wasn’t united behind Mr. Schumer’s election strategy this year. He championed a traditional approach: directing the bulk of the party’s financial and logistical resources toward handpicked candidates in a few competitive races. Howard Dean, who heads the Democratic National Committee, advocated a “50-state strategy,” spreading money around toward the longer-term goal of making the party viable even in areas that have been Republican strongholds.
After the victory—the Democrats picked up six Republican-held seats and defended every Democratic one—Mr. Schumer hardly seemed ready to concede the point.
“Fifty-state is a good thing to do, but it didn’t help us in this election,” said Mr. Schumer. “My only disagreement with Howard is that he should help us fund taking back the majority, because it would make a difference with things like the Supreme Court. And he came through—he ended up giving us $7.5 million. We tried the honey approach rather than the vinegar approach, and it worked.”
--SNIP--
Ok, I'm thinking that these 12 are up in 2008.
Arkansas: Pryor (D) Delaware: Biden (D) Illinois: Durbin (D) Iowa: Harkin (D) Louisiana: Landrieu (D) Massachusetts: Kerry (D) Michigan: Levin (D) Montana: Baucus (D) New Jersey: Lautenberg (D) Rhode Island: Reed (D) South Dakota: Johnson (D) West Virginia: Rockefeller (D)
I don't think so. chafee is gone but so is santorum, allen, talent and burns.
It is time to play hard ball with this clown Schumer.
The President needs to throw a political fastball at his head and bean him good.
I am dead serious. Get her on the court, get a few decisions under her belt. Then let Chuck try to fire her.
First Nominate her. Let her go to the judiciary comittee. Let Schumer then refuse an up or down vote. Then appoint her in recess because Shcumer refuses to allow senate to fulfill its advise and consent obligation. Then let her appear in pictures with all the other SCOTUS members.
Make Schumer eat a fastball. SCREW HIM!!!!
They did the right thing.....before Bush II, out of hundreds of SCOTUS nominees in 220 years only a couple have been rejected by the Senate.....Presidents deserved fair treatment of their choices.
There isn't a problem here...judicial appointments are the one area where power inherently lies with the President, not the Senior Senator from New York.
Bush might not get anything else done, but Alito/Roberts like judges should squeak through.
1 is enough. Now that Chafee is gone, we don't have any more complete backstabbers.
How about Santorum for SCOTUS?
From reports in the Lame Stream Media that I heard, the Dem's only won those House and Senate seats by around 50,000 nation wide votes total. That's not much of a "mandate" IMHO. If the dem's don't perform, that majority could easily disappear in the next election cycle.
If this last election was their honey approach, I'd hate to SEE their vinegar approach!
They are so full of BS. They will always take the low road; they don't know how to do anything else.
Another Democratic Fool
Huh? Do you mean to say that staying home or voting rat last week will lead to still more far-left judges??
Why, imagine that!!!!!!!
No judge who doesn't believe wholeheartedly in the leftist agenda will ever get out of committe.
Way to go, GOP!!
Schumer, Reid, Pelosi and the rest will have the freshmen rat congressman and junior senators locked into their far-left agenda before the new term even starts.
If we had a responsible media, they would put these people on record saying what they will and will not vote for (and against) as they fulfill their new responsibilities to the voters who ushered them in.
Better '06 than '08....
Amen and amen.
About the size of it, alright.
That is 4 out of how many? 6 Senate, 26 House?
There is only so much damage this "gentleman" can bring about all by himself!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.