Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abramoff Reports to Prison Tomorrow; Offers Testimony on Democratic Senators
ABC NEWS ^ | November 14, 2006 4:13 PM | Brian Ross and Rhonda Schwartz

Posted on 11/15/2006 8:24:09 AM PST by Nalu

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: staytrue

this actually may turn out better than if it came out before the election, due to "dramatic effect". Maybe Bush can call congress back from recess to hold a few little hearings...


21 posted on 11/15/2006 8:35:36 AM PST by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nalu

In other news, the new Democratic leaders in Congress have decided that the problem of corruption isn't that widespread, and have decided to drop prosecution...


22 posted on 11/15/2006 8:36:41 AM PST by 50sDad (I respect other religions by allowing them the right to worship. But they still are wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Nah we were losing because of the Iraq war but now that the dems are in charge the war is theres to handle(withdraw).
This will give voters a reality check on the dems, one way or they other, hating Bush only goes so far and that includes the pubs


23 posted on 11/15/2006 8:37:59 AM PST by italianquaker (Democrats its time to fish or cut bait, no more blaming Prez Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nalu

The problem is that the electorate sort of expects Democrats to be amoral & corrupt. It's a dog-bites-man story to the Media.


24 posted on 11/15/2006 8:38:42 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o

I think you are right. Besides, the electorate will not care. Corrupt Republicans go to jail (Cunningham); corrupt Democrats get re-elected (Jefferson).

Like Negroes of long ago, and Working Women of yore, Republicans must work twice as hard and be twice as clean as their Democratic counterparts to overcome the double standard.


25 posted on 11/15/2006 8:38:55 AM PST by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Nalu
...including what Abramoff has reportedly described as "six to eight seriously corrupt Democratic senators."

This won't be a story - dems always get a pass from the MSM.

What's fun is to hear MSM excuses about why it's not a story... ( when it's a dem).

Same story, but an "R" by the name and it's front page above the fold.

26 posted on 11/15/2006 8:40:18 AM PST by GOPJ (The MSM 's so busy kissing democrat butt they can't see straight - come up for air guys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nalu

So when do we find out who those seriously corrupt dims are?


27 posted on 11/15/2006 8:41:20 AM PST by YellowRoseofTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nalu
"Abramoff Reports to Prison Tomorrow; Offers Testimony on (corrupt) Democratic Senators"

Does anybody really believe that the vast majority of Senators, both parties, aren't corrupt? To me, "corruption" in the Senate means anybody who places their personal agendas before the will and the general welfare of the majority of Americans, and any Senator who abuses his office to fatten his own bank account and that of his friends. The problem is that most Americans today will happily accept such corruption if their Senators simply work for a few things which they are in agreement on. But Capitol Hill is an armpit of corruption and abuse of power, which I hope and pray will one day be voted into oblivion by the American people, and completely purged from the corruption that passes itself off as "authority". Most of the people running our country today are the sort of miscreants and thieves which our Founding Fathers would certainly prefer to fight against than to work with.

28 posted on 11/15/2006 8:42:27 AM PST by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YellowRoseofTx

Sorry, but the Repubs are a bunch of spineless wusses. If this is announced it'll go nowhere. A day or two media rationalization and then it'll be filed next to Sandy Berger.

Think about it....LOTT will be leading the charge.


29 posted on 11/15/2006 8:45:22 AM PST by bust (A biased media is the biggest threat to our democracy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: YellowRoseofTx

Probably senators who have been in office for at least a few terms, and likely includes some who have been around for a long time. Narrows the list a little bit, but not enough.


30 posted on 11/15/2006 8:46:17 AM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
The problem is that the electorate sort of expects Democrats to be amoral & corrupt. It's a dog-bites-man story to the Media.

No, that's a MSM rationalization. And if you have doubts about that, think of the last time a reporter asked a dem if in fact he was corrupt and thought it was OK to be corrupt. Dem would be "oh so offended" if asked.

The MSM believes any self-serving excuse that will give them a pass for their outrageous bias...

Don't buy their bullsh-t, Tallguy. It's a sham.

Have you ever seen a horrible parent who loves one child so much more than the others? Ever listen to their lame excuses? Really, it's disgusting. Almost as disgusting as the MSM...

31 posted on 11/15/2006 8:48:13 AM PST by GOPJ (The MSM 's so busy kissing democrat butt they can't see straight - come up for air guys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Nalu

Nothing to see here. Move along. Move along.


32 posted on 11/15/2006 8:49:10 AM PST by Safetgiver (Stinko De mayo, Stinko to the Commies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nalu

I question the timing of this article.





:o)


33 posted on 11/15/2006 8:50:46 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YellowRoseofTx

Probably senators who have been in office for at least a few terms, and likely includes some who have been around for a long time. Narrows the list a little bit, but not enough.


34 posted on 11/15/2006 8:50:56 AM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Nalu

All we need is 1 of those "seriously corrupt Dem Senators" to resign in disgrace (I don't believe it either, they have no shame) and see the power swing back (provided he's replaced with a Rep somehow)


35 posted on 11/15/2006 8:55:27 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bust
If this is announced it'll go nowhere...

It'll go nowhere becasue the press won't pick it up... Remember Foley? He wrote creepy letters to pages.

A Dem in the same position was boinking pages... and the press?

Which one did the MSM think was worse? Foley? Yep - whenever the "R" is by a name, that's the one that's worst. And yeah, they had a lame excuse for not covering the dem - an excuse they bought.

Then again, the MSM tends to buy any excuse for themselves that shields them from the reality of their unfairness and bias.

36 posted on 11/15/2006 8:56:32 AM PST by GOPJ (The MSM 's so busy kissing democrat butt they can't see straight - come up for air guys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Nalu

The Dems will just shrug their shoulders, and let the perps ammend their reports and go on as if nothing happened, while the MSM spins it to look like the Republicans are witch hunting.


37 posted on 11/15/2006 8:58:17 AM PST by DaiHuy (CHRIST LEFT OUT OF 2006 CHRISTMAS. JUST ASK YOUR DEPT STORES.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

I'm confident one of them is Harry Reid. Having the Senate Majority Leader resign in shame would be delicious, but I have my doubts too.


38 posted on 11/15/2006 9:00:26 AM PST by ichabod1 ("For make benefit of Our Glorious Socializt Revolution")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Nalu

Now the question, will anything come of it????


39 posted on 11/15/2006 9:05:36 AM PST by gulfcoast6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1
Democrat Senators from states with Republican governors:

Connecticut - Dodd and Lieberman

California - Boxer and Feinstein

Florida - Nelson

Hawaii - Inouye and Akaka

Indiana - Bayh

Nebraska - Nelson

Nevada - Reid

North Dakota - Conrad and Dorgan

Rhode Island - Reed

South Dakota - Johnson

My guess is the list includes at least Harry Reid, Tim Johnson, Daniel Akaka, Chris Dodd (major Indian gambling interests in CT), Byron Dorgan, and Kent Conrad. Dodd is the new chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, and the Republican Governor Rell was just reelected in a landslide. I would be especially happy to see him get nailed, resign, and Rob Simmons be appointed to the Senate.

40 posted on 11/15/2006 9:14:59 AM PST by Dems_R_Losers (The people have spoken.......the housecleaning starts NOW!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson