Skip to comments.
Mid-flight sexual play lands US couple afoul of anti-terrorism law
The News International ^
| Nov 14, 2006
| anonymous
Posted on 11/15/2006 7:11:46 AM PST by bigdcaldavis
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-148 next last
To: highball
Well somehow it became such a problem that charges were made so There must have been some reason that they were. I still say its stupid and that good manners on both sides would have ended it. However they weren't used. And the man was charged. As I wasn't there I don't know and to be honest its pretty boring now so I am done with this. Have a great day!!
121
posted on
11/16/2006 5:54:23 AM PST
by
pandoraou812
( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
To: LIConFem
To: pandoraou812
Well somehow it became such a problem that charges were made so There must have been some reason that they were.
Do you think that everyone arrested, or charged with a crime, is guilty?
They have the power to arrest based solely on the word of the flight attendant. That he was charged means nothing unless you already believe that flight attandant.
123
posted on
11/16/2006 7:00:29 AM PST
by
highball
(Proud to announce the birth of little Highball, Junior - Feb. 7, 2006!)
To: pandoraou812
Just as a follow-up:
I still say its stupid and that good manners on both sides would have ended it.
Do you think that bad manners ought to be punishable under anti-terrorism laws? That's what seems to have actually happened.
124
posted on
11/16/2006 7:02:06 AM PST
by
highball
(Proud to announce the birth of little Highball, Junior - Feb. 7, 2006!)
To: highball
We really don't know what was said or not said as no passengers have come forward. Theres only 2 sides being shown here. I personally think its stupid. I don't think he should have said what he said and I don't think he should be charged. However I do think if asked by the attendant the man should have stated he was sick or he should have removed his head from her lap. Do I think he should be charged? hmmmm not really. I think this is just a case of being too stupid to remove your head from your girlfriends lap even though it was offending other people who complained about it. Its more of a case of stupidity. I think it will be dropped and the guy will sue.
125
posted on
11/16/2006 7:33:04 AM PST
by
pandoraou812
( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
To: pandoraou812
I agree that there may well be fault to go around.
I think you're missing the bigger picture, though - anti-terror laws should not even have been raised. If they're being mentioned now, how will a Dim president abuse them?
126
posted on
11/16/2006 8:12:31 AM PST
by
highball
(Proud to announce the birth of little Highball, Junior - Feb. 7, 2006!)
To: Sir Gawain
Go lick some more boots.ROFL!
To: highball
No I am not. God only knows what the dems will do, its a scary thing to think about. I was thinking about this and came up with this question. Don't we have air marshals on all flights? If so then where was he during this? I don't like flying, never have . However yrs ago I was on a flight to TX and 2 drunks got into a fight . Plane landed and they were arrested. Now this was way back in the early 80's. I was told then it was a fed crime to cause a disturbance on a flight. Is that true? I agree anti-terror laws should not even have been raised as this was not an act of terror.
128
posted on
11/16/2006 8:35:43 AM PST
by
pandoraou812
( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
To: Sir Gawain
So they're terrorists now? And freepers agree with that assessment? They are "terrorists" only according to the MSM spin.
If you had threatened a flight crewmember prior to 9/11 because she asked you to put your seat in an upright position for landing, you would have been in deep kim-chee back then too.
This has nothing to with sex or terrorism.
It has everything to do with threatening a flight crewmember during the performance of their duty.
To: bigdcaldavis
Just had to post this since it involves flight attendants.
My flight was being served by an obviously gay flight attendant, who seemed to put everyone in a good mood as he served us food and drinks. As the plane prepared to descend, he came swishing down the aisle and told us "Captain Marvey has asked me to announce that he'll be landing this big scary plane shortly, so lovely people, if you could just put your trays up, that would be super."
On his trip back up the aisle, he noticed this well-dressed and rather Arabic looking woman hadn't moved a muscle.
"Perhaps you didn't hear me over those big brute engines, but I asked you to raise your trazy-poo, so the main man can pitty-pat us on the ground."
She calmly turned her head and said, "In my country, I am called a Princess and I take orders from no one."
To which (I swear) the flight attendant replied, without missing a beat, Well, sweet-cheeks, in my country I'm called a Queen, so I outrank you. Tray-up, Bitch."
To: bigdcaldavis
I'm calling BS. Southwest has no cross-country flights. If they go from L.A. to Raliegh, it would likely be with stops in places like Phoenix and Memphis. They could have just kicked them off the plane there.
131
posted on
11/16/2006 9:00:28 AM PST
by
Tall_Texan
("Journalislam" - reporting about murderous extremists as if they are moral equivalents.)
To: pandoraou812
The time I felt sick on a plane (on the return flight after having caught the flu during the flight up), I asked for a pillow, lowered the tray in front of me and dropped my head onto the pillow for the entire flight. I would have never sought someone's lap. That's a very hollow argument.
132
posted on
11/16/2006 9:09:00 AM PST
by
Tall_Texan
("Journalislam" - reporting about murderous extremists as if they are moral equivalents.)
To: pandoraou812
I agree anti-terror laws should not even have been raised as this was not an act of terror. Then you and I have no quarrel.
That's what I was seeking to clarify.
133
posted on
11/16/2006 9:19:02 AM PST
by
highball
(Proud to announce the birth of little Highball, Junior - Feb. 7, 2006!)
To: highball
Of course we have no quarrel, Have a great day!
134
posted on
11/16/2006 12:04:18 PM PST
by
pandoraou812
( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
To: Tall_Texan
I wouldn't have either. I would have reclined . I think twisting one's self to get their head into someone's lap is hollow too. I think also if you are asked to not do something because it is offending others you should comply.
135
posted on
11/16/2006 12:07:34 PM PST
by
pandoraou812
( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
To: unixfox
--It's apparent the flight attendant went to public school. ZERO tolerance policies and ZERO common sense have been ingrained.
But for God's sake, DO NOT profile the passengers because that may hurt someone's FEELINGS!--
Libertarian?
To: pandoraou812
You already sacrifice a lot of privacy and comfort to get on an airplane and spend two hours to get some place instead of driving for a day. It seems to me that you can sit still for that length of time and just read or chat. Anything beyond that is just bonus and, if you don't like it, get in a car and drive there. Plenty of people already do.
137
posted on
11/16/2006 12:37:58 PM PST
by
Tall_Texan
("Journalislam" - reporting about murderous extremists as if they are moral equivalents.)
To: Tall_Texan
--get in a car and drive there.--
Just make sure no truckers are next to you ...
To: Jack Hammer
Is that a bomb in your pants, or are you just glad to see me?
Nope...that was a really loud stinky fart. :)
139
posted on
12/25/2006 11:32:03 PM PST
by
bigdcaldavis
("I'm not some candy-assed white liberal looking to turn you into better citizens." - Martin Querns)
To: bigdcaldavis
As predicted, The "Patriot Act" is being abused.
No surprise there.
What's surprising is the number of cheerleaders who think it's a good thing to use it this way.
Incredible.
140
posted on
12/25/2006 11:58:30 PM PST
by
Dr.Zoidberg
(Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-148 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson