Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mid-flight sexual play lands US couple afoul of anti-terrorism law
The News International ^ | Nov 14, 2006 | anonymous

Posted on 11/15/2006 7:11:46 AM PST by bigdcaldavis

WASHINGTON: A couple's ill-concealed sexual play aboard a Southwest Airlines flight from Los Angeles got them charged with violating the Patriot Act, intended for terrorist acts, and could land them in jail for 20 years.

According to their indictment, Carl Persing and Dawn Sewell were allegedly snuggling and kissing inappropriately, "making other passengers uncomfortable," when a flight attendant asked them to stop, reads the indictment filed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

On a second warning from the flight attendant, Persing snapped back threatening the flight attendant with "serious consequences" if he did not leave them alone.

The comment was enough to have the couple, both in their early 40s, arrested when the plane reached its destination in Raleigh, North Carolina, and charged with obstructing a flight attendant and with criminal association.

They have been placed under legal surveillance until their trial on February 5. If found guilty, they both could be sent to jail for up to 20 years.

Persing's lawyer William Peregoy said his client was not feeling well when he placed his head on his companion's lap, and that he only threatened the flight attendant with reporting him to his superiors on landing.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: milehighclub; patriotact
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-148 next last

1 posted on 11/15/2006 7:11:47 AM PST by bigdcaldavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis
That's a harsh penalty for joining the Mile High Club.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

2 posted on 11/15/2006 7:13:53 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

They didn't even do that. They were "snuggling."


3 posted on 11/15/2006 7:14:41 AM PST by highball (Proud to announce the birth of little Highball, Junior - Feb. 7, 2006!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis

she offerred her honor
he honored her offer
and throughout the night
it was onher and offher


4 posted on 11/15/2006 7:15:05 AM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis
Typical misleading MSM headline.

"Sexual play" did not get them in trouble with the law - threatening a crewmember did.

5 posted on 11/15/2006 7:15:57 AM PST by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis
Persing's lawyer William Peregoy said his client was not feeling well when he placed his head on his companion's lap

Yeah, right.

6 posted on 11/15/2006 7:17:12 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis
Threatening a flight crew member is (and should be) a criminal offense. But this is a misapplication of the Patriot Act, in the same vain as the misapplication of the RICO statutes by federal prosecutors.

No sympathy for this couple, but the proper laws should apply.
7 posted on 11/15/2006 7:18:06 AM PST by LIConFem (Just opened a new seafood restaurant in Great Britain, called "Squid Pro Quid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Yes. But it's a preposterous use of the Patriot Act. Why? Explosive Orgasm?


8 posted on 11/15/2006 7:19:20 AM PST by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

They were arrested for his remark about serious consequences. So much for free speech. This is the kind of thing people were concerned about when the Patriot Act was passed. Using a law meant for one thing to punish people who don't behave in a manner consistant with the enforcer's beliefs.


9 posted on 11/15/2006 7:23:08 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis

"Persing's lawyer William Peregoy said his client was not feeling well when he placed his head on his companion's lap..."

Don't you just love attorneys?


10 posted on 11/15/2006 7:30:28 AM PST by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Well, but threatening people has always been illegal. It didn't become illegal because of the Patriot Act.


11 posted on 11/15/2006 7:30:41 AM PST by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Now just imagine how Hitlery Klintoon could use the Patriot Act if elected president. Speak out against eminent domain, which is a key component of the Communist Manifesto (which Hitlery and her ilk follow like a football playbook)? Violation of the Patriot Act. Speak out in favor of the Federal Marriage Amendment and against same-sex marriage? Violation of the Patriot Act. Say that global warming is a neo-lib-invented lie? Violation of the Patriot Act. Speak out in favor of border security and against illegal immigration and the North American Union? Violation of the Patriot Act.


12 posted on 11/15/2006 7:31:35 AM PST by bigdcaldavis (Xandros : In a world without fences, who needs Gates?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jammer
Explosive Orgasm?

Again, sex had nothing to do with it.

A passenger threatened a crewmember during a flight.

Threats against crewmembers were illegal before the Patriot Act and are considered serious matter by the Patriot Act as well.

13 posted on 11/15/2006 7:31:50 AM PST by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis

This is total bull$hit. The flight attendent was probsbly ugly and jealous as hell that he/she had no chance in hell for that to happen to him/her.\


14 posted on 11/15/2006 7:32:21 AM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highball

If their snuggling was making other people uncomfortable then they should have just stopped. If they want to be doing sexual things then they should be in a private plane. Threatening a flight attendant wasn't a smart idea. Maybe there were children on board. I think there is a time and place for everything and I guess this just wasn't the time to be snuggling for them.


15 posted on 11/15/2006 7:32:29 AM PST by pandoraou812 ( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis

So they're terrorists now? And freepers agree with that assessment? Make note of how freepers change their tune when President Hillary arrests them for far less using the same law.


16 posted on 11/15/2006 7:33:44 AM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

So you agree that they're terrorists?


17 posted on 11/15/2006 7:34:43 AM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis
It's apparent the flight attendant went to public school. ZERO tolerance policies and ZERO common sense have been ingrained.

But for God's sake, DO NOT profile the passengers because that may hurt someone's FEELINGS!

18 posted on 11/15/2006 7:35:04 AM PST by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: pandoraou812
"Maybe there were children on board."

I think the woman in the middle seat complained!

20 posted on 11/15/2006 7:36:36 AM PST by TommyDale (Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson