Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox to broadcast interview with O.J. Simpson
Associated Press ^

Posted on 11/15/2006 4:47:05 AM PST by El Turco

Fox plans to broadcast an interview with O.J. Simpson in which the former football star discusses “how he would have committed” the slayings of his ex-wife and her friend, for which he was acquitted, the network said.

The two-part interview, titled “O.J. Simpson: If I Did It, Here’s How It Happened,” will air Nov. 27 and Nov. 29, the TV network said.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: doublemurderer; enoughofojsgames; frythebastardnow; guilty; judithregan; murder; oj; simpson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
I hope some of the people who cheered the verdict get to reflect on their actions, too.
1 posted on 11/15/2006 4:47:06 AM PST by El Turco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: El Turco

How do you get the title for this article?


2 posted on 11/15/2006 4:48:44 AM PST by BunnySlippers (Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Turco

When I read the title, I was sure it must have been Greta van Susteren doing the interview. I'm surprised it's Judith Regan, and she's pimping the book. Not good at all.


3 posted on 11/15/2006 4:50:32 AM PST by LimberJim (It says "Breakfast Any Time", right? I'll have the pancakes in the Age of Enlightenment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LimberJim

Is this supposed to be cute? amusing?

This is on Fox?

Rupert Murdoch is one sick pig.

Maybe one day he'll know what it's like to have a child butchered.


4 posted on 11/15/2006 4:52:35 AM PST by watsonfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: El Turco
I hope some of the people who cheered the verdict get to reflect on their actions, too.

OJ was surely guilty, but the verdict was correct.

These are not contradictory statements.

5 posted on 11/15/2006 4:52:43 AM PST by bondjamesbond (Does it have to be McCain or Giuliani? Are we that pathetic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: watsonfellow

I agree - it's disgusting.


6 posted on 11/15/2006 4:53:31 AM PST by LimberJim (It says "Breakfast Any Time", right? I'll have the pancakes in the Age of Enlightenment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: El Turco

Did OJ graduate from the Jim Webb book writing school?


7 posted on 11/15/2006 4:55:51 AM PST by WildWeasel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bondjamesbond

Lets see- you are either being sarcastic, or reflecting on an apparently weak case put on by the prosecution.

I for one (having not been present to hear all evidence presented) believe that the jury was incompetent.

What disturbs me nearly as much is that not one penny if the civil judgment against OJ has been paid. But I don't see him missing any golf outings.


8 posted on 11/15/2006 4:56:09 AM PST by TheBattman (I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LimberJim

I am seriously beginning to greatly fear for our civilization:

1) We have trash like Paris Hilton achieving fame and celebrity.
2) Butchers like OJ can go on tv to basically brag about cruelly murdering two people


I could go on and on and on and on.

We need a Savonarola.


9 posted on 11/15/2006 4:57:55 AM PST by watsonfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WildWeasel
Did OJ graduate from the Jim Webb book writing school?

Don't know -- did Jim Webb graduate from the O.J. carving school?


10 posted on 11/15/2006 4:58:04 AM PST by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: El Turco

OJ must need money. I hope his victims families continue to find reason to keep bringing lawsuits.


11 posted on 11/15/2006 5:00:59 AM PST by dforest (Don't get fooled, the bigger struggle is still out there, and growing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

The verdict must be based on the evidence presented at trial, not on some absolute truth. So, though OJ is almost certainly guilty, the jury could only act on what they saw and heard in the courtroom.

Given that, the jury made the right call.


12 posted on 11/15/2006 5:01:29 AM PST by bondjamesbond (Does it have to be McCain or Giuliani? Are we that pathetic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bondjamesbond

Oh and I suppose that the fact that two of the Jurors gave OJ the black power salute would have nothing to do with their verdict.


RIGHTTTTTTTTT


13 posted on 11/15/2006 5:03:22 AM PST by watsonfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: El Turco

Maybe some people should watch it, before they tell others that they should reflect on their actions. If he DID do it, there was no evidence to convict him. What was speculated pre-trial was not proven.


14 posted on 11/15/2006 5:04:20 AM PST by World'sGoneInsane (LET NO ONE BE FORGOTTEN, LET NO ONE FORGET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bondjamesbond
So, though OJ is almost certainly guilty, the jury could only act on what they saw and heard in the courtroom. Given that, the jury made the right call.

I watched that trial and saw what the jury saw. If they had acted on the evidence presented and what they saw in the courtroom, they would have voted to convict.

15 posted on 11/15/2006 5:06:18 AM PST by Maceman (This is America. Why must we press "1" for English?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: El Turco

Fox is going to hell in hand basket. I turned it off this morning when John Edwards was on.


16 posted on 11/15/2006 5:06:39 AM PST by Cricket24 (ULTRA PATRIOT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
What disturbs me nearly as much is that not one penny if the civil judgment against OJ has been paid. But I don't see him missing any golf outings

Nor has he lifted one finger to find the "real killer" as he vowed to do.

17 posted on 11/15/2006 5:09:12 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: El Turco

I plan to leave the house and do something constructive, like watch paint dry, to show my disdain for this broadcast.


18 posted on 11/15/2006 5:11:31 AM PST by CharentonChina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Turco

I'm rather disgusted with Fox or any news outlet letting this murderous pig have even 5 seconds of air time.


19 posted on 11/15/2006 5:14:21 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
I for one (having not been present to hear all evidence presented) believe that the jury was incompetent.

I followed it pretty closely, since at the time I worked maybe 200 yards from the murder scene; used to see Orenthal buzzing around Brentwood quite regularly.

I'll never forget one of the jurors who got bounced early on as he was being interviewed by media types..."DNA don't mean nuffin - lotsa peoples gots the same blood type" came out of his mouth.

20 posted on 11/15/2006 5:15:59 AM PST by ErnBatavia (recent nightmare: Googled up "Helen Thomas nude"....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson