Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Libertarian Effect
Real Clear Politics ^ | 11/13/06 | ROSS KAMINSKY

Posted on 11/14/2006 6:25:58 PM PST by Purple GOPer

In one closely watched Congressional race (Sodrel v Hill, IN-9) and two critical Senate races (Missouri and Montana), the Republican candidate was defeated by fewer votes than the Libertarian candidate received.

[Note: the last data I could find on the Missouri race still had two of the 3746 precincts to report, so it is possible that statement isn't true for Missouri, but if it is not true it is still very close and does not diminish my point.]

In other words, in these two critical Senate races and if the Republican had gotten the Libertarian's votes, the Republican would have won.

For the rest of this article, please recognize that I am speaking of the small-"l" libertarian, and not the Libertarian Party of the candidates mentioned above. A "libertarian", in the shortest definition I can muster, is someone who is fiscally conservative and socially liberal. In other words, it is someone who wants the government to perform a very small set of legitimate functions and otherwise leave us alone.

I can hardly contain my glee at seeing this happen after years of hoping it would. And in such dramatic fashion, with such important results. I did not hope it would because I wanted Republicans to lose, but because the Republicans had become corrupted (by which I do not mean corrupt in the typical sense.) They became enamored of power, and believed that they could get away with expanding the size, intrusiveness, and cost of government as long as they had government aim for "conservative" goals rather than liberal ones. This loss, and the way it happened, was the best thing that could have happened for Americans who care about a government focused on limited government and liberty.

No, the Democrats are not that government. They believe in anything but limited government, and they only believe in liberty in one's personal life, but not in one's economic life. In a sense, Democrats believe that the citizens work for the government.

Republicans on the other hand have acted in just the opposite way: they believe in economic liberty and they know we do not work for government. But they do not believe in personal liberty. The failure of the strategery of the Republicans, to focus on "the base" by trotting out social issues such as the South Dakota no-exception abortion ban (which lost, I'm pleased to say) demonstrated two things: First, social issues do not have long coat-tails. Second, the GOP base is fiscal conservatives more than it is social conservatives.

Fiscal conservatives, even more than social conservatives, were the demotivated voting block. Fiscal conservatives who are not socially conservative, i.e. voters who are libertarian even if they don't know it or wouldn't identify themselves that way, were the key swing vote in this election and were the reason that the GOP lost Congress...the Senate in particular.

In a recent study called "The Libertarian Vote", David Boaz (Cato Institute) and David Kirby (America's Future Foundation) discuss the growing number of American libertarians, the growing dissatisfaction among them (including me) with the GOP, and the continuing shift in voting patterns caused by that dissatisfaction. Tuesday held the obvious conclusion of this shift.

The party which went from reforming welfare to banning internet gambling by sticking the ban inside a port security bill, the party which went from Social Security reform to trying to amend the Federal Constitution to prevent gay marriage, the party which went from controlling the size and scope of government to banning horse meat became a party which libertarians and Republicans alike could not stomach.

The Democrats are a disaster, though they probably realize they need to move to the center. The Republicans have just been taught a brutal lesson that they also need to move to the center (on social issues) and back to fundamental principles of our Founders on issues of economics and basic liberties. No party can rely on the unappealing nature of their opponent to be a strong enough motivation to win elections, nor should we let them win if being just a bit better than the other guys is all they aspire to.

What I love about libertarian voters is that they vote on principle, not on party. The GOP might not like it, but politics should not be about blind loyalty if your party has lost its way. So, I disagree with suggestions that libertarians are fickle and unreliable voters. Instead the Republicans became an unreliable party. The Democrats on the other hand are extremely reliable -- they will always raise spending and taxes, get government involved where it doesn't belong. But other than the tax cuts of several years ago, the Republicans have been no different other than choosing different areas of our lives to intrude upon.

I hope that the result of the Libertarian Effect, particularly on the GOP, will be that the next election may provide us an opportunity to replace this batch of Democrat placeholders with Congressmen who not only have read the Constitution, but respect it. Congressmen who understand that Republican voters do not elect politicians to have them impose their (or our) morality on the people, but rather to keep government from interfering in our lives and leaving us, in the immortal words of Milton Friedman, "Free to Choose".


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bigbsjob; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360361-370 next last
To: dixiechick2000; potlatch


You won free salt for your popcorn at the new Casino Royale 007 film


341 posted on 11/15/2006 9:40:13 PM PST by devolve ( _classic_moments_in_Kohn_jobs_)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000; devolve

No, but you might have uncovered the only person in the world who didn't see Odd Job in a movie, lol!!


342 posted on 11/15/2006 9:40:29 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: devolve; dixiechick2000
With sour cream on it!


343 posted on 11/15/2006 9:43:09 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: devolve

There's a new Casino Royale?

I watched the old one just this past weekend.
I coulda used the salt then...;o)


344 posted on 11/15/2006 9:44:20 PM PST by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

You're kidding...right? LOL

I thought EVERYONE knew Odd Job!


345 posted on 11/15/2006 9:45:10 PM PST by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: potlatch; dixiechick2000
 Goldfinger LOL 

346 posted on 11/15/2006 9:45:39 PM PST by devolve ( _classic_moments_in_Kohn_jobs_)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

Sour cream on popcorn?


That's a concoction I haven't heard of before!


347 posted on 11/15/2006 9:46:11 PM PST by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000

Not kidding, stopped going to movies many years ago because of my hearing and never watched it on TV!!


348 posted on 11/15/2006 9:47:55 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Very pretty, THAT I am familiar with.


349 posted on 11/15/2006 9:48:48 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000; devolve

That's the boobie prize, lol!!

Sorry DC, some people like sour cream.


350 posted on 11/15/2006 9:50:50 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: potlatch


The ol' sour cream deal -


351 posted on 11/15/2006 9:51:29 PM PST by devolve ( _classic_moments_in_Kohn_jobs_)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

I'm sorry to hear that.
It was a very good movie.


352 posted on 11/15/2006 9:52:14 PM PST by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

I love sour cream.
I just never thought of putting it on popcorn.

I may just have to try it.


353 posted on 11/15/2006 9:53:02 PM PST by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: devolve; potlatch

It surely was good to see you both.
I'm going to take something for my sinus headache.

Have a good evening.
See y'all later!


354 posted on 11/15/2006 9:54:11 PM PST by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000; devolve

No, it was just a joke I bring up from time to time, lol.

Nothing worse than soggy popcorn!


355 posted on 11/15/2006 9:54:49 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000

Night DC!


356 posted on 11/15/2006 9:56:02 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: potlatch; dixiechick2000

    


357 posted on 11/15/2006 10:03:18 PM PST by devolve ( _classic_moments_in_Kohn_jobs_)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Looks very good there.


358 posted on 11/15/2006 10:06:35 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: potlatch



Yeah - funny

Like he doesn't know to to throw at

--





359 posted on 11/15/2006 10:09:48 PM PST by devolve ( _classic_moments_in_Kohn_jobs_)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: devolve

He's looking for you..


360 posted on 11/15/2006 10:11:40 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360361-370 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson