Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DNC Statement on Giuliani's Potential Presidential Bid
Democrats.org ^

Posted on 11/14/2006 4:12:37 PM PST by Sub-Driver

DNC Statement on Giuliani's Potential Presidential Bid

November 14, 2006

The Democratic National Committee issued the following statement in response to news that former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani may seek the GOP nomination for President:

"It's unclear whether or not Rudy Giuliani will be able to just 'explain away' the fact that he's consistently taken positions that are completely opposite to the conservative Republican base on issues they hold near and dear," said Democratic National Committee Communications Director Karen Finney. "Throughout his career Giuliani has tried to paint himself as a moderate, but now that he's vying for his Party's nomination will he undergo an extreme makeover in an attempt to cozy up to the far-right?"

Giuliani Was A Registered Democrat For Much Of His Life. Giuliani registered as a Democrat and even served as a party committeeman on Long Island when he was 21. [U.S. News & World Report, 3/23/87; USA Today, 12/20/99]

Giuliani Is Pro-Choice. When asked to respond to social issues on CNN's Inside Politics, Giuliani replied, "I'm pro-choice." [CNN, 12/2/99]

Giuliani Doesn't Support A Ban On Partial-Birth Abortions. When asked whether he supported a ban on what critics call partial-birth abortions, Giuliani replied, "No, I have not supported that, and I don't see my position on that changing." Giuliani also told The Albany Times Union that he would not support a ban on late-term. Moreover, when asked "If you were in the Senate and he [President Clinton] vetoed the so-called partial-birth abortion procedure.you would support the president on that." Giuliani replied: "Yes. I said I then that I support him, so I have no reason to change my mind about it." [CNN, 12/2/99; New York Times, 11/26/99; CNN Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer, 2/6/00]

Giuliani Identified Himself As Pro-Gay Rights and Supports Civil Unions and Gay Benefits. When asked to respond to social issues on CNN's Inside Politics, Giuliani replied, "I'm pro-choice. I'm pro-gay rights." When asked whether marriage should be between a man and a woman, Giuliani agreed, but stated "I supported civil unions, however, partnerships, and I signed that legislation when I was mayor of New York City. The distinction is that you protect people's rights."[CNN, 12/2/99; Hardball, 10/13/04]

Giuliani Opposed Bush Tax Cut. "Although Mr. Giuliani is running as pro-gun control, pro-abortion-rights Republican who likes tax cuts, he did shy away yesterday from the large tax cut proposal of his political benefactor, George W. Bush, which has been criticized as too large and favorable toward the rich." [New York Times, 2/04/00]

Giuliani Announced a Publicly Funded Voucher Plan That Would Have Taken $12 Million Out of New York City Public Schools. In his State of the City address in January 1999, Giuliani proposed paying for a school voucher program with City money. In his FY2000 Preliminary Executive Budget, Giuliani proposed spending $12 million over two years to establish the administrative structure for a voucher program in a volunteer school district so as many as 3,000 public school students could attend private and parochial schools in the city. "The money would be distributed through [Giuliani's] office to avoid involving Schools Chancellor Rudy Crew, who opposes the idea," according to The New York Times. At a speech in Miami in March, 1999, The New York Times reported that, "Mr. Giuliani, who is in the midst of considering his political future, has adopted the national Republican Party's enthusiasm for school vouchers. On Sunday, while delivering a speech in Miami, for example, he called it "the most important thing that has to be done with education in America." [New York Times, 4/26/99; 3/4/99]

Giuliani Refused To Endorse Minimum Wage Increase. Giuliani declined to endorse an increase in the minimum wage to $6.50 from $5.50, pending studies that he said were necessary to make certain that a higher rate would not lead to the elimination of many low-paying jobs. [New York Times, 10/17/99]

Giuliani Said It Would Be a "Good Thing" If the Poor Left the City; Said That Was His Welfare Strategy. In April 1995, Rudy Giuliani said that many poor New Yorkers could be forced to leave New York City as a consequence of his welfare reforms, and that it "would be a good thing." WNYC radio then reported that Giuliani said in a press briefing, "That's not an unspoken part of the strategy. That is our strategy." The mayor denied these comments and offered to play them back, but his communications director had not taped the session. [Newsday, 4/29/95]

Source URL: http://www.democrats.org/a/2006/11/dnc_statement_o_9.php


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-266 next last
To: Sub-Driver
In other words, the DNC is afraid of Giuliani as a Presidential Candidate in 2008?

Why else would they start their smear attack so soon after the Mid Term Elections?
21 posted on 11/14/2006 4:36:36 PM PST by HighlyOpinionated (Mohammed Lied; Jesus Died (For Your Sins) and Rose Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fkabuckeyesrule
It seems odd that the DNC feel the need to comment on a republican mentioning that he's just thinking or exploring the possibility to run for president. Clearly the dems are a little worried about him.

Yep....thought it was very odd reading it myself - I get the distinct feeling the Democrats are terrified of him.

22 posted on 11/14/2006 4:38:54 PM PST by Strategerist (Those who know what's best for us must rise and save us from ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Statements like that were prevalent when Arnold was running in the recall, they are afraid of moderates, they'd prefer we nominate someone on the far right.


23 posted on 11/14/2006 4:40:30 PM PST by BonnieJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Does the DNC define Republicanism? No? Didn't think so.


24 posted on 11/14/2006 4:42:02 PM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
As far as I'm concerned the ONLY issue in this next election, is the WoT. That said, we better get our act together and soon, because it we go into the General Election as a fractured party WE (not the Dims) will hand the presidency to Hitlery.

The problem I see with the current cast of characters that are running right now is that they ALL divide the party.
That scares the crap out of me.

I have NO DOUBT that Hitlery will hand over the reigns of our government and military to the U.N. If she wins, America, and for that matter, the rest of the world will bow at the alter of Mohammad.
25 posted on 11/14/2006 4:45:09 PM PST by Anti-Hillary (Barbour/Steele '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Its very clear that the Democrats are scared to death of him. All the more reason to nominate him.


26 posted on 11/14/2006 4:45:13 PM PST by My GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nitzy

If the 2008 matchup is indeed Hilary v. Rudy and any self-described conservative votes for a third party instead of Rudy because of their disagreement with some of his social positions (and let me add I vehemently disagree with him with respect to abortion) is a... stark... raving... insane... retarded... moron.

Rudy is quite clearly the lesser evil in that match-up. And voting for a third party means that the much greater evil of Hilary would win.

With Rudy we have a chance of getting conservative Justices with Hilary not at all.

With Rudy we have a chance of a strong anti-Jihadist foreign policy. With Hilary we only have appeasement.

With Rudy we have a chance of keeping the Bush tax cuts. With Hilary -- we get higher and higher taxes.




27 posted on 11/14/2006 4:48:21 PM PST by tdewey10 (Can we please take out iran's nuclear capability before they start using it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tdewey10

I hate not being able to edit posts! If you're a self-described conservative and you don't vote for Rudy (if the 2008 matchup is Rudy v. Hilary) then you're a moron.


28 posted on 11/14/2006 4:50:07 PM PST by tdewey10 (Can we please take out iran's nuclear capability before they start using it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This is going to be fun and I'd LOVE to be one of Rudy's "advisers" or at least someone that could chat into his ear and lend him a hand.


29 posted on 11/14/2006 4:56:34 PM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdewey10

Ironic, that how we wound up with Bubba, may be how we get Hitlery. I feel like I am on a merry-go-round in a house of horrors!!!!


30 posted on 11/14/2006 4:57:14 PM PST by Anti-Hillary (Barbour/Steele '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The Democrat consultants have ceased talking about the election and are now focused on Rudy.
Just caught a nanosecond of Matthews and he acted worried about Rudy- " men love him, he's a guy's guy , he brings in big crowds everywhere, even the deep South.."
The Democrats are definitely worried about Rudy, as well they should be.


31 posted on 11/14/2006 5:00:32 PM PST by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue

I'm personally scared s-less of Evan Bayh. I honestly think a guy like that would be unbeatable regardless of who the Republican nominee is.

However, I think the Democrats are too stupid to nominate him.


32 posted on 11/14/2006 5:04:55 PM PST by Strategerist (Those who know what's best for us must rise and save us from ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary


see Obama knock Hitlery around.!!!
33 posted on 11/14/2006 5:08:58 PM PST by John Lenin (The most dangerous place for a child in America is indeed in its mother's womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary
As far as I'm concerned the ONLY issue in this next election, is the WoT.

This is where Giuliani looks very weak as a candidate. I would venture to guess that no more than 10%-20% of the electorate will consider the "war on terror" (whatever the hell that means) to be the top issue in 2008. Even if Rudy gets 100% of them to vote for him, he'll have a tough hill to climb.

34 posted on 11/14/2006 5:11:28 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
OK RNC where are you? We lost the last election because the RNC didn't respond to any of the charges made by the DNC. Our guys were missing on TV and the few that did show up most of the time agreed with the democrats or said very little. The DNC is already out and front for the next election and the RNC is setting back having coffee and thinking about it. I am being to think that the Republican Party has left me standing on the corner. I see another bad election in 2008, you can't win if you don't show up and our guys ain't showing up.
35 posted on 11/14/2006 5:12:34 PM PST by engrpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Arnold won in a landslide ...


36 posted on 11/14/2006 5:15:03 PM PST by BunnySlippers (Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: engrpat

I am getting the very distinct (and totally sickening) feeling that the RNC isn't doing anything because it's leader, Bush, is pulling for Hillary to be the next president. After all, The Bush's and Clinton's have been nearly inseperable the past couple of years. Call me crazy.


37 posted on 11/14/2006 5:21:20 PM PST by frankiep (Beer - the cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I will never vote for Rudy.



Ron Paul for president!


38 posted on 11/14/2006 5:22:44 PM PST by Chewbacca (I reject your reality and substitute my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It sounds like they're calling him back, back to his roots.

Maybe Hillary wants him as Veep.


39 posted on 11/14/2006 5:23:01 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

haha thats too much.. the DNC saying "Rudy is bad, he is too much like us Democrats!"


40 posted on 11/14/2006 5:23:21 PM PST by eXe (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-266 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson