Skip to comments.
IAEA Finds Unexplained Plutonium, Enriched Uranium Traces in Iran Waste Facility
FoxNews ^
| 11/14/06
| AP
Posted on 11/14/2006 9:12:13 AM PST by dinoparty
Edited on 11/14/2006 12:25:47 PM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-146 next last
To: dinoparty
I'm shocked...shocked I tell you!
101
posted on
11/14/2006 1:40:04 PM PST
by
MEG33
(GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES.)
To: dinoparty
shocked!! shocked!! whoda thunk it?
102
posted on
11/14/2006 1:53:53 PM PST
by
acsrp38
(Found: WMD Saddam didn't have before he didn't have them)
To: dinoparty
Unexplained? I think the explanation is obvious and has been for a long time. Plain as the nose on your face.
This should be no surprise to anyone. It was perfectly predictable and clearly the aim of the Iranian regime from the get go...and it is not like they haven't announced their desire to obtain atomic WMDs or what they intend to do with the product through their blatant and regular rhetoric.
We, as in the US, should immediatley open a biltarleral dialog with Ahmadinejad with this simple statement.
"You have until November 30th of this year to completely stop all uranium enrichment and nuclear weapon research, and to stop all funding and support of terrorist organizations, internal or external to your nation, which are waging war against the United States of America. You must do this by this date, making it verifiable to our complete satisfaction. Otherwise, beginning at a time of our choosing after that date, but following swiftly, all of your nuclear research facilities, all of your command and control (including political leadership), and all of your major war making capabililities will be systematically destroyed by the armed forces of the United States of America.
Any quetions or comments?"
We should then send a message to N. Korea, and Syria to watch and learn because they are next, and another communique to the Red Chinese, the Russians, Venezuela, Cuba, and any others of a similar ilk, to stand well back and not interfere.
103
posted on
11/14/2006 2:09:17 PM PST
by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be)
To: LongViewSC
I'm still a huge Bush supporter. Iraq is not lost and it won't be. So many seem to want instant results not considering that we are butting up against thousands of years of culture, a people that have been traumatized by a horrible regime and the desire for vengeance against those who benefited from it. Considering that, Iraq has come a long way and shown the desire for democracy by their vote. I think Bush knows what he is doing. He is still the commander in chief. Pelosi&Co. are just wannabees and I predict their party will self destruct from infighting within the next 2 years if not sooner. In the meantime W will handle Iran and Syria. What he doesn't need are his "supporters" who will cut and run when things don't happen fast enough. None of this Islamofacist crap started during the Bush administration. It started years ago during the peanut farmer years and escalated during the Clinton administration where it went hugely ignored. Then it was all dumped in W's lap on 9/11. All things considered he has done a stellar job so far. Minds and hearts don't change with the speed of broadband. No matter how great the technology you are still dealing with humans in a war. The media is greatly under reporting the good that has and is being done there, and some at FR seem to have forgotten all this too. What the president needs is a little faith and support from us, and yes if one is not too squeamish at the mention, a lot of prayers too. I for one intend to give that much to him.
104
posted on
11/14/2006 2:17:26 PM PST
by
Merlinator
(To those who vote Democrat.......Osama thanks you very much!)
To: All
We should also point out that this isn't the highly enriched uranium (30-40 times more intense than anything used for electricity) that the IAEA busted with them twice before.
This is plutonium, and there is only one use for it.
"Unexplained" nothing... they just continue to refuse the OBVIOUS explanation.
105
posted on
11/14/2006 3:03:06 PM PST
by
FreedomNeocon
(Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
To: Merlinator
106
posted on
11/14/2006 3:26:12 PM PST
by
malia
(President Bush - a man of honor!! clinton as President a man of horror)
To: acsrp38; All
Shhhhhh, quiet.....
Don't worry....
The Democrats will take care of it.
107
posted on
11/14/2006 4:19:25 PM PST
by
LiveFreeOrDie2001
(They're "Terrorists" and they want to KILL YOU !!!)
To: LiveFreeOrDie2001
108
posted on
11/14/2006 4:22:24 PM PST
by
LiveFreeOrDie2001
(They're "Terrorists" and they want to KILL YOU !!!)
To: Howlin; Enchante
Well well well what a shock. I mean who could believe this. We need to talk to Iran they are just sooo sooo good! When they bomb Israel maybe then the idiots will believe what Iran has been saying all along wasn't a bluff.
109
posted on
11/14/2006 4:26:03 PM PST
by
hipaatwo
(Vote for your life. Every vote for a Democrat is a vote against victory.)
To: dinoparty
do I
really have to say it???
110
posted on
11/14/2006 4:35:47 PM PST
by
Chode
(American Hedonist ??)
To: Enchante
Iran has no active nuclear reactor online as of yet that it could use to eventually extract plutonium from spent fuel rods. And that process if all was totally operationoal would be a few years down the pike, assuming they did not return the fuel rods to the Russians as they are supposed to do. They are still in the very early phase of engineering and actually assembling a sufficiently large enough series cascade gas centrifuge system capable of producing sufficient amounts of highly enriched uranium, where I am talking about a percentage in the high eightees or low nineties which would provide them with what we call weapon grade uranium.
Therefore, they either have gotten very small amounts of plutonium form say NK, China, Russia, or Pakistan for experimenting with, e.g. nuclear hot lab processes for instance, or they have accquire the stuff via. some other means.
But the article does not disclose as usual any usefull information. What percent of U235 of a given amount was dedected. What amount of plutonium was detected. Are we talking about microcuries amounts where some piece of equipment obtained elsewhere may have had a tiny bit of residual of either atttached to it.
I am not going to knee jerk. To much knee jerking was done by us last year.
That does not mean I am insensitive to their plans to eventually obtain the techniques to fabricate some low yield atom weapon. They could eventually obtain that level of sophistication.
111
posted on
11/14/2006 4:52:10 PM PST
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
To: b4its2late
Any chance that we'll preempt the little Iranian scum Nope...the U.S. is already completely, totally, neutered.
The Iranians get the bomb and we get to live with whatever the outcome is...we no longer get to act, only react to world events. And our reactions will be most underwhelming.
To: Enchante
Good point abour the IAE meddling in our elections. 2004 leak on 380 tons of explosives, 2006 leak on Iraq nuke program.
113
posted on
11/14/2006 5:19:08 PM PST
by
PghBaldy
(Reporter: Are you surprised? Nancy Pelosi: No. My eyes always look like this.)
To: Orange1998
I was aginst attacking Iraq, and hesitant at the beginning. If we had attacked Iran instead, I'm sure it would have been even more difficult.
114
posted on
11/14/2006 5:21:57 PM PST
by
PghBaldy
(Reporter: Are you surprised? Nancy Pelosi: No. My eyes always look like this.)
To: dinoparty
The fact that 87% (IIRC) of Jews voted for Dems this year will be helpful. When push comes to shove, the Dems won't want the next Dem President to have to deal with this issue. That doesn't mean they'll allow Bush to handle it, only that I believe we might have a chance to deal with this.
115
posted on
11/14/2006 5:25:45 PM PST
by
PghBaldy
(Reporter: Are you surprised? Nancy Pelosi: No. My eyes always look like this.)
To: Scott from the Left Coast
If that is true, and it is very likely true, we will then have to deal with the Arab world's nuke race. It will be a disaster beyond compare. So far, 6 Arab nations have said they want "peaceful nuclear power" too. THAT is what Bush should remind the American people.
116
posted on
11/14/2006 5:28:27 PM PST
by
PghBaldy
(Reporter: Are you surprised? Nancy Pelosi: No. My eyes always look like this.)
To: Rembrandt_fan
We are between a rock and a hard place and I, too, hope the President has a card up his sleeve.
117
posted on
11/14/2006 5:36:11 PM PST
by
unkus
To: Enchante
I heard this on Brit's show tonight. At least this IS getting some play here.
To: dinoparty
OK. And the surprise is.........?
To: tdewey10
I think I could explain the plutonium -- let me see -- Iran is trying to make a nuclear weapon?DING DING DING! We have a winner!
120
posted on
11/14/2006 8:44:46 PM PST
by
Just Lori
(Blessed are the peacemakers: ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, MARINES, COAST GUARD!!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-146 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson