To: Scutter
I have no problem being called "anti-abortion". I am anti-abortion. I never asked to be referred to as "pro-life". So I have no issue with the terminology used to describe my stance on it. But if we're really being fair & unbiased, then if I am to be called "pro-life", they should be referred to as "pro-death". "Pro-choice" is such a pretty little term for the murder of the innocents. To call them pro-abortion is being more than fair.
147 posted on
11/14/2006 6:34:49 AM PST by
Sue Perkick
(The true gospel is a call to self-denial. It is not a call to self-fulfillment..John MacArthur)
To: All
Well, because I liked the show (like Fox), I sent them an email to
friends@foxnews.com This may not be the exact email address... But if they get enough emails... they will get the message. Do it.
151 posted on
11/14/2006 6:39:43 AM PST by
ElPatriota
(Let's not forget, we are all still friends despite our differences)
To: Sue Perkick
"Pro-choice" is such a pretty little term for the murder of the innocents."
All the old timers who read this board should ask themselves, If abortion had been not only legal,but encouraged and funded when you were conceived, would you be here today arguing about politically correct definitions.?
What about your siblings?
If their stance was reversed and the left wingers stood for Pro Life, The New York Times and Time Warner would be displaying graphic front page images that would make the Dachau and Cambodian Killing Fields photos look like a private family burial plot.Instead, since pro life is a conservative cause, the self serving image black out and the politically correct definition continues.
159 posted on
11/14/2006 6:58:57 AM PST by
TET1968
(SI MINOR PLUS EST ERGO NIHIL SUNT OMNIA)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson