Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National Review Wrong: Pence, Shadegg Are the Conservative Candidates
Human Events ^ | November 13 2006 | Editorial

Posted on 11/13/2006 4:32:42 PM PST by Reagan Man

Our friends at National Review played Hamlet in an editorial this morning, pondering whether to be or not to be for the proven conservative candidates—Mike Pence of Indiana and John Shadegg of Arizona—who are running for the top two posts available to House Republicans, minority leader and minority whip.

National Review argues that current Majority Leader John Boehner of Ohio and current Majority Whip Roy Blunt of Missouri “deserve a hearing” in their bids to continue leading the GOP in the next Congress.

HUMAN EVENTS says: We’ve heard enough already.

If House Republicans maintain Boehner and Blunt as their leaders, they will be saying to grassroots conservatives: Get lost.

They will be saying: We didn’t get the message that you want us to return to the limited government vision of Ronald Reagan.

Boehner and Blunt are practitioners of big government. Pence and Shadegg are two conservatives who have had the courage to fight the congressional leadership of their own party and a president of their own party, when those leaders and that president worked to increase the size and power of the federal government.

Because Boehner and Blunt have worked with Bush to increase government over the past six years, there is every reason to believe they will work with Bush again—as Bush works with Speaker-to-be Nancy Pelosi—to increase government over the next two years.

Boehner and Blunt both voted for President Bush’s No Child Left Behind Act. Boehner even sponsored the bill, working with liberal Democratic Sen. Teddy Kennedy of Massachusetts, to make sure it became law. Since Bush signed this bill, federal education spending has more than doubled. In a press conference last week, Bush indicated he wants to work with the Democrats in Congress to re-authorize No Child Left Behind. Can Boehner and Blunt be counted on to fight Bush and Pelosi when they collaborate in trying to make this program even bigger?

No, they can’t.

Boehner and Blunt also both voted for President Bush’s Medicare prescription drug entitlement—expanding the federal welfare state with the first new entitlement program since President Lyndon Johnson left office. This was a monumental betrayal of conservative principles.

Pence and Shadegg voted against No Child Left Behind, and led a heroic fight on the House floor to stop the Medicare prescription drug entitlement.

Had Boehner and Blunt fought alongside Pence and Shadegg to stop the Medicare prescription drug entitlement, it never would have become law. Instead, they sided with President Bush and the welfare-state Republicans.

They failed to lead then. They should not be given leadership positions now.

HUMAN EVENTS strongly supports Mike Pence for minority leader and John Shadegg for minority whip and urges conservatives to call members of Congress and urge them to do the same.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatism; conservativeagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
>>>>If House Republicans maintain Boehner and Blunt as their leaders, they will be saying to grassroots conservatives: Get lost.

>>>>They will be saying: We didn’t get the message that you want us to return to the limited government vision of Ronald Reagan.

1 posted on 11/13/2006 4:32:45 PM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
No surprise. RINO Central at NRO still learned NOTHING from last Tuesday. When the going gets tough you send for your sons of a bitches, not your Establishment Lapdogs.
2 posted on 11/13/2006 4:35:39 PM PST by MNJohnnie ( People who see the glass half full win, those who see it half empty lose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Human Events isnt entirely correct about this.

They need to read the speech made by Roy Blunt last Thursday.

I agree with Pence, but we need to consider what the whip's job is and how Shadegg is quite frankly, in experienced at it when we need it most.


3 posted on 11/13/2006 4:35:59 PM PST by BoBToMatoE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Pence seems pretty cool -- don't know much about the other guy. Current guys have to go.


4 posted on 11/13/2006 4:37:25 PM PST by tdewey10 (Can we please take out iran's nuclear capability before they start using it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BoBToMatoE
I'm confident, John Shadegg is very capable of getting up to speed real quick.

Remember Bob Michel? Well, Shadegg is no Michel. LOL

5 posted on 11/13/2006 4:40:26 PM PST by Reagan Man (Conservatives don't support amnesty and conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

John Boehner is my congressman............dump him now!


6 posted on 11/13/2006 4:42:45 PM PST by Recon Dad (Marine Spec Ops Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Baynative
Enumerated Powers Act

That would be great. Original intent/original meaning. Wonder who thought of that? ;^)

8 posted on 11/13/2006 4:49:28 PM PST by Reagan Man (Conservatives don't support amnesty and conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BoBToMatoE

John Shadegg is perfect for the job. He's tough, personable, conservative, and would look really GREAT on TV. That's what we need, people who will get out there and defend conservative values in a smart and articulate way.


9 posted on 11/13/2006 4:54:13 PM PST by McGavin999 (Republicans take out our trash, Democrats re-elect theirs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999


A classic choice, money or ideology.


10 posted on 11/13/2006 5:00:14 PM PST by padre35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Everybody get involved and call every Republican Congressman in your state on this. Otherwise you won't have any right to bitch when a bunch of RINOS run the show and get in bed with the Dems to sell us all down the river.


11 posted on 11/13/2006 5:09:37 PM PST by lesser_satan (EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan
Agreed.

For now, however, seems like many FReepers are still in shock over the election outcome.

12 posted on 11/13/2006 5:19:17 PM PST by Reagan Man (Conservatives don't support amnesty and conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Wow, I like that idea. It would keep the rest of the critters too busy trying to figure out how to excuse their big government garbage to actually do anything!


13 posted on 11/13/2006 5:28:12 PM PST by DaisyCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Not me. Everbody quit crying in their beer and get over it. That crap won't get us anywhere. We lost. We deserved it to a large extent. Now it's time to move forward, find new leaders, and do something constructive.


14 posted on 11/13/2006 5:28:48 PM PST by lesser_satan (EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

What are you waiting for, get a thread going on that already!


15 posted on 11/13/2006 5:32:18 PM PST by lesser_satan (EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

It seems pretty apparent that the Republicans need to re-energize themselves as conservatives, or just throw in the towel for 2008.

Pence and Shadegg offer a revolutionary reinvigoration.


16 posted on 11/13/2006 5:45:16 PM PST by colonel mosby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Reagan Man

Bush doubles the size of the Dept of Education, when the Contract with America wanted to get rid of it altogether.

It's time for some Blunt talk: "Roy, get lost!"


18 posted on 11/13/2006 5:53:51 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

But do we do it?


19 posted on 11/13/2006 6:09:00 PM PST by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
John Shadegg has sponsored a very insightful bill to help cut the cost of health care insurance. This kind of legislation puts everyone to the test, DO YOU REALLY WANT LESS GOVERNMENT THEN SUPPORT THIS BILL"...

This article goes over the benefits of HR 2355.
Article by the Heritage Foundation
The Health Care Choice Act: Eliminating Barriers to Personal Freedom and Market Competition

The Health Care Choice Act (H.R. 2355 and S.1015), sponsored by Representative John Shadegg (R-AZ) and Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC), would amend current law to allow for interstate commerce in health insurance plans while preserving states’ primary responsibility for the regulation of health insurance. These changes would broaden and intensify competition among health plans and medical providers, encourage a serious review of existing health care regulation in the states, and expand the choice of millions of Americans of more affordable health insurance plans. The result: reduced health care costs and greater access to health care coverage.
20 posted on 11/13/2006 11:54:59 PM PST by Fred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson