Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WashTimes: China sub secretly stalked U.S. fleet (surprisingly within firing range)
Washington Times ^ | Washington Times

Posted on 11/12/2006 10:23:21 PM PST by quesney

By Bill Gertz THE WASHINGTON TIMES November 13, 2006

The USS Kitty Hawk aircraft carrier The USS Kitty Hawk aircraft carrier (AFP/Getty Images)

A Chinese submarine stalked a U.S. aircraft carrier battle group in the Pacific last month and surfaced within firing range of its torpedoes and missiles before being detected, The Washington Times has learned.

The surprise encounter highlights China's continuing efforts to prepare for a future conflict with the U.S., despite Pentagon efforts to try to boost relations with Beijing's communist-ruled military.

The submarine encounter with the USS Kitty Hawk and its accompanying warships also is an embarrassment to the commander of U.S. forces in the Pacific, Adm. William J. Fallon, who is engaged in an ambitious military exchange program with China aimed at improving relations between the two nations' militaries.

Disclosure of the incident comes as Adm. Gary Roughead, commander of the U.S. Navy's Pacific Fleet, is making his first visit to China.

[...]

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aircraftcarrier; chicoms; china; kittyhawk; russia; sneakattacks; submarine; usskittyhawk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
"Adm. Fallon...has made several visits to China in recent months in an attempt to develop closer ties...However, critics of the program in the Pentagon say China has not reciprocated and continues to deny U.S. military visitors access to key facilities, including a Beijing command center. In contrast, Chinese military visitors have been invited to military exercises and sensitive U.S. facilities."

Uh, why are we doing this?

1 posted on 11/12/2006 10:23:27 PM PST by quesney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: quesney

surfaced within firing range of its torpedoes and missiles before being detected...


2 posted on 11/12/2006 10:25:16 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
And we are decommissioning our S-3's.
3 posted on 11/12/2006 10:26:49 PM PST by oyez (Why is it that egalitarians act like royalty?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: quesney

Maybe because we owe them money and they wanted a VIP tour of our bases.


4 posted on 11/12/2006 10:27:00 PM PST by FLOutdoorsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quesney

It will only get worse now that China has some of it's own in power in the US...


5 posted on 11/12/2006 10:28:04 PM PST by Dallas59 (Muslims Are Only Guests In Western Countries)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Better get the Orions flying again shadowing enemy submarines and ready to sink them at a moments notice.


Its likely we very well knew where the submarine was and did not want to top them off to the fact. They put a torpedo into one of our aircraft carriers and we vaporize their country......
6 posted on 11/12/2006 10:35:01 PM PST by wodinoneeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Unfortunately, our illustrious President has done nothing to stop the growing Chinese threat.

Our base belong to them.


7 posted on 11/12/2006 10:39:57 PM PST by SubmarineNuke (To the Sea I shall return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SubmarineNuke

What was the mission of this sub? Was it offering goods for sale at WalMart?


8 posted on 11/12/2006 10:44:50 PM PST by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: oyez

I do not know.


9 posted on 11/12/2006 10:56:01 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76

Like we would tell them that we know they are there.


10 posted on 11/12/2006 10:58:11 PM PST by Uriah_lost (We've got enough youth, how about a "fountain of smart")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

I'm not surprised at all by Chinese military behavior. What I want to know is why are we allowing these visits to sensitive US military facilities. Why are we treating them with kid's gloves like some sort of ally, especially when we're getting little or nothing in return?


11 posted on 11/12/2006 10:59:54 PM PST by quesney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: quesney

The Soviets "shadowed" our carrier battle groups all the time during the Cold War. There were protocols about how close they could approach (which was still pretty close), and other "provocative" acts. Sometimes there would be "incidents" when one side or the other didn't appear to be following the "rules".


12 posted on 11/12/2006 11:08:05 PM PST by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oyez
And we are decommissioning our S-3's.

You mean ES-3's.

13 posted on 11/12/2006 11:18:11 PM PST by Doofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: quesney
"Between 2002 and last year, China built 14 new submarines, including new Song-class vessels and several other types, both diesel- and nuclear-powered."


Song-class diesel (the class that stalked Kitty Hawk)


Song-class diesel
14 posted on 11/12/2006 11:31:15 PM PST by diesel00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quesney

I've read this story several times in the last few hours, but every post leaves some frustrating questions. How do we know this Chinese sub was "undetected"? If the sub had been detected, what could we have done about it? Obviously, not much.


15 posted on 11/12/2006 11:32:26 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quesney

The Democrats and the public needs to be reminded of this every damn day. Bush doesn't necessarily need to make his rhetoric louder. Actions speak louder than words.


16 posted on 11/12/2006 11:42:30 PM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quesney
>>>>>"I'm not surprised at all by Chinese military behavior. What I want to know is why are we allowing these visits to sensitive US military facilities. Why are we treating them with kid's gloves like some sort of ally, especially when we're getting little or nothing in return?"<<<<<

I want to know why CNN, Durbin, Rockefeller, Reid and Hillary Clinton feel that we need to feed them (China) any and all information necessary to make them feel "EQUAL" to us.

It is the Libs entire PLAN for self defense. If China FEELS EQUAL to us they will no do anything, and leave us alone.

Not kidding at all, and I think that since it is their Political ideology they have demonstrated it and literally committed Treason that it continues to go on without Prosecution.

How do you Prosecute?

TT
17 posted on 11/12/2006 11:42:34 PM PST by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: diesel00

The newer Yuan-class diesel, thought to be an improvement of the Song-class.
18 posted on 11/12/2006 11:45:30 PM PST by diesel00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: quesney

That same naive attitude in re to china by GWB/Rumsfeld came back to bite them last tuesday in re to iraqi freedom and democracy. Making nice to thugs only gets you killed, on the battlefield and in the ballot box.


19 posted on 11/12/2006 11:52:47 PM PST by timer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quesney

1) we owe them money. they support our multinationals in manufacturing capacity and our government in buying our bonds, of which they have nearly 1 trillion dollars' worth.

2) was it detected before or after it surfaced? no carrier is without sub escort. that info is not public - can this sub escape our our carrier group's escort sonar capacity? This info is presumably very classified at this point. It may not be the first such incident either.

3) it surfaced. this is a very clear message in and of itself.

4) anyone who reads the news knows china is actively building up its military capacity, including its navy, with features such as aegis cruisers with tech stolen from us, and obviously the sub fleet is going to be a big part of this.

5) we live in a country that funds china's military buildup (this is under republicans and Bush), and presumably this will continue under democrats. that's life in the brittle aged superpower that is the US.

6) anyone who followed the 1996 chinese money issue with the DNC or the cox report and has half a brain would assume our political system is awash with chinese money. The implications follow.


20 posted on 11/12/2006 11:59:25 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson