Posted on 11/12/2006 6:39:27 AM PST by SirLinksalot
Good one! ROLF.
Well, there's nothing I can say that would satisfy your curiosity. Sorry.
Elton John sucks.
He REALLY sucks!
Well...a few years ago I removed - and destroyed - anything by Bruce Springsteen from my music collection after he started calling for the impeachment of Bush at his concerts.
It's about time to do the same for Reginald...
The world's homosexualists have, of course, consistently desired not merely to exercise their preferences in private, but to force the planet's population to recognize their activities as a legitimate alternative to heterosexual marriage. In this endeavor, religion - with its fixed codes of moral rectitude - has always been their greatest enemy. The overthrow of world religion is thus a necessary end, toward which all who are "committed to the cause" must strive. Combined with the noxious diktats of Political Correctness, which insists that sky is earth and earth is sky, up is down and down is up, a significant portion of the world's people are intent on eliminating all rationality from life. Worse, they may be succeeding; the Modern World has become a place which is often a cause for considerable justifiable dismay.
Elton has sucked - in more ways than one - for about 30 years now...at least!
So that's why the feminazis hate Christianity so much!
There's a new definition of PC making the rounds that about covers it:
Political Correctness:
A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
By spreading this definition around, perhaps we can employ one of the more effective methods of deflating and defeating the fools who practice and promote it: RIDICULE.
Unless stopped and soon PC will DESTROY Western Civilization -- if it hasnt already.
PASS IT ON!!
OK, guys -- what it is: Bill Clinton's CDC released figures a few years ago reflecting that fully 85% of all AIDS/HIV cases are 1. Active, non-monogamous homosexuals, (the largest subset) 2. Heterosexuals and bisexuals who have had sex with group 1 and 3. IV drug abusers who share needles. (Kinda gives new meaning to Romans 6:23, doesn't it?) The remaining 15% are those who have contracted AIDS via other means (such as blood transfusions, making THEM the REAL victims of AIDS.
One homosexual "leader" on the West Coast URGED his fellow homosexuals to CONTINUE to attempt to contaminate the blood supply in order to involve the straight community in the push to increase federal funding for AIDS research. What a guy -- er -- gay! That research. BTW, would much less necessary if these folks would simply stop doing nasty and unhealthy things to themselves.
Now that's something to choke on.
And one from Drudge, for anyone who wants to read more, lots of comments:
Drudge: "ELTON JOHN: 'I WOULD BAN RELIGION COMPLETELY'"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1737001/posts
Guess again:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;...
What a predicament; someone who is a pervert and almost certainly doesn't like guns, is going to need a whole lot of guns before he can ban Christianity, or Judism, and especially Islam...
ALL homosexual activists believe this.
Most homosexuals believe this so it is no surprise.
(see NYT editorial policy)
Elton John is just barfing the hedonistic line. Religion says you can't hump link an indiscriminate animal and therefore it is bad.
Sounds like elton likes to be a reciever.
and every time you say it that way, the homosexuals giggle with delight.
Elton, shut up and sing----or better yet, don't sing. You haven't sounded that good for a decade or more.
Funny, how he misses the whole point of what he is obviously still in denial about---that most of the civilized world accepts "gayness" as long as it doesn't continually come out and aggressively promote itself as victim in the "we're here, we're queer, we're in your face! mode. He said he was expecting "the odd flour bomb" at the civil union of him and his partner, but it didn't happen. "I guess we are the acceptable face of gayness" is the mistaken lesson he draws from that.
Congress can't pass a law prohibiting the free exercise of religion...but activist judges can make up whatever rules they want.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.