Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RUSSIA'S SHIFTING NUCLEAR STRATEGY
AFPC Missile Defense Briefing ^ | 11/10/06 | Ilan Berman, ed.

Posted on 11/10/2006 8:25:44 PM PST by bruinbirdman

Amid growing concern in Moscow about the potential impact of a U.S. missile defense deployment in Europe, Russian strategists are retooling their country’s nuclear posture and warfighting strategy. "NATO is so close to the Russian borders nowadays that strategic bombers cannot hope to take off in case of a sudden attack (the order will take too long reaching them, and besides, they will have to be fuelled and outfitted first)," writes analyst Aleksei Vaschenko in the November 10th edition of Defense and Security. Likewise, although "[r]ailroad missile complexes posed a bona fide threat to the Americans," these systems have been largely dismantled over the past two decades thanks to the policies of Presidents Gorbachev and Yeltsin.

The result, Vaschenko concludes, is that Russia must rely on asymmetric weapons in the event of a confrontation with the United States – chief among them the use of "Super-EMI [electromagnetic impulse]." "Powerful electromagnetic impulse released by explosions affected electronic equipment, lines of communications, power networks, and radars" in previous nuclear detonations, and specialists "claim that explosion of such a device (10 megatons 300-400 kilometers above the surface) over Nebraska which is the geographic center of the United States will render all electronic gear all over the country inoperable for the period of time sufficient to prevent nuclear retaliation." Not surprisingly, writes Vaschenko, “[t]he Russian nuclear component includes Super-EMI" as a “response to American nuclear blackmail.”


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: coldwar2; emi; emp; putin; russia; sovietunion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 11/10/2006 8:25:46 PM PST by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Does anyone have any idea how many Americans will starve to death if one EMP is exploded 125 miles above Nebraska? No cars will work, no machinery, no nuclear power plants, no radios or TV's or computers or trains, or planes...No fresh water or filtration... Just In Time will kill. Time to harden the chips.


2 posted on 11/10/2006 8:32:55 PM PST by GOPJ (The MSM is so busy kissing democrat butt they can't see straight - come up for air guys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Yep, sure 'nuf. America will be unable to do a thing after that bomb goes off above Nebraska. We don't have hardened sites or nothin'. We're finished. /sarcasm


3 posted on 11/10/2006 8:33:46 PM PST by Rightone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
"A BUMPY ROAD FOR THE “BULAVA”

Not all is well in the Russian strategic arsenal, however. Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozrenie writes in its November 7th issue that a key component of the Russian strategic arsenal – the “Bulava” ship-launched ICBM – has experienced a string of test failures and mechanical mishaps that threaten to undermine the Russian military’s plans for the next-generation missile. “It was originally intended [for the military] to adopt it for operational service in 2005. Then 2007 began to be mentioned. Finally the Moscow Thermotechnical Institute's director and general designer, Yuriy Solomonov, declared that the Bulava ICBM will enter service with the Navy in 2008,” the military paper notes. “The Bulava project is no longer saving either money or time,” and continued failures with the program could render the new nuclear submarines the Kremlin plans to acquire “useless.”" -- American Foreign Policy Council

yitbos

4 posted on 11/10/2006 8:35:44 PM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
experienced a string of test failures and mechanical mishaps P> What do you think is going on with the test failures?
5 posted on 11/10/2006 8:40:41 PM PST by GOPJ (The MSM is so busy kissing democrat butt they can't see straight - come up for air guys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
experienced a string of test failures and mechanical mishaps

What do you think is going on with the test failures?

6 posted on 11/10/2006 8:40:54 PM PST by GOPJ (The MSM is so busy kissing democrat butt they can't see straight - come up for air guys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Not to mention that our conventional forces aren't hardened enough to deal with these weapons, and Russia's is.

Also, Russia has been deploying a road and rail mobile missle as of late. It is called the SS-27, NATO code Topol-M. Russia has a goal to build over 300 of these missles by 2008, each carrying up to 16 warheads, which can easily penetrate missile defense shields. Russia is also considering deploying IRBM's as well.


7 posted on 11/10/2006 8:42:52 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

At the same time, Russia has said this in the past and yet had the capibilities. This is just to justify Russia spending more money to acquire more units of the missile.


8 posted on 11/10/2006 8:44:15 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

And to those that think that Ivan died along with the USSR, think and look again. The country is being run with an Iron Fist by a KGB good-ole-boy....


9 posted on 11/10/2006 8:45:58 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
"What do you think is going on with the test failures? "

They're trying to make pigs fly?

I suspect they have as many problems with the subs as with the “Bulava” ship-launched ICBM.

yitbos

10 posted on 11/10/2006 8:50:32 PM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rightone
Read the e-book "Lights Out" for one man's take on a possible outcome of an EMP attack on our power grid. I don't have a link, but run a search for survivalist fiction and the title and you should get plenty of results. It's not our hardened governmental/military bunkers that we need to worry about. It's our own cars, transformers, water pumping stations, hospitals, food delivery infrastructure, etc.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

11 posted on 11/10/2006 8:51:36 PM PST by wku man (Breathe...Relax...Aim...Squeeze...Smile!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Why are they thinking in terms of fighting us? What's their motivation? Do they think the EU is going to invade them? Do they fear a massive onslaught from the mighty French? The mighty Germans? They're insane. Unless they're planning a strategic alliance with Al Qaeda, they don't need to be on a war footing against us at all.

I think there's some serious alcoholic poisoning in Russia these days.


12 posted on 11/10/2006 9:00:16 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
"Why are they thinking in terms of fighting us? What's their motivation? Do they think the EU is going to invade them?"

Believe it or not, it is a jobs program.

yitbos

13 posted on 11/10/2006 9:03:48 PM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

You're right. A jobs program.

Also a pride program.

They don't have much to be proud of. Their experiments in democracy and capitalism are pretty much failing.

So they can still dream of blasting American cities and relive the glories of yesteryear, when commies were commies and if you opened your mouth they sent you to the gulag.


14 posted on 11/10/2006 9:08:28 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
"Also a pride program."

The bravado (standing up to the Great Satan) also helps them with the Mooslimes, with whom they are in cahoots.

yitbos

15 posted on 11/10/2006 9:19:31 PM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

They left out the part about using third world countries to launch them.


16 posted on 11/10/2006 9:23:02 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Riiiight - we're gonna attack Russia? What are these guys - North Korea now?

"The US is going to attack us, so we have to build superweapons to take them out."

17 posted on 11/10/2006 9:23:34 PM PST by rjp2005 (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90
Time to put the MIRV busses back on our missiles and quit with the nonsense about converting our ICBMs to 'conventional' weapons.

Here we go again...

Duck! ...and cover! Duck! ...and cover!

18 posted on 11/10/2006 9:26:32 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
I think there's some serious alcoholic poisoning in Russia these days.

Someone soldered a leak in the still?

19 posted on 11/10/2006 9:28:18 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Why are they thinking in terms of fighting us? What's their motivation? Do they think the EU is going to invade them? Do they fear a massive onslaught from the mighty French? The mighty Germans? They're insane. Unless they're planning a strategic alliance with Al Qaeda, they don't need to be on a war footing against us at all.
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

They are Iranian allies and are posturing for their benefit.
20 posted on 11/10/2006 9:34:39 PM PST by photodawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson